COMPARISON OF EFFICACY OF PDE5 INHIBITORS (SILDENAFIL) VERSUS ALPHA-BLOCKERS (TAMSULOSIN) IN TREATMENT OF LOWER URINARY TRACT SYMPTOMS (LUTS) SECONDARY TO BENIGN PROSTATIC HYPERPLASIA

IU Haq, .. Shahjehan, G. Ghous, HR Asghar, A. Rizwan, U. Hanif
{"title":"COMPARISON OF EFFICACY OF PDE5 INHIBITORS (SILDENAFIL) VERSUS ALPHA-BLOCKERS (TAMSULOSIN) IN TREATMENT OF LOWER URINARY TRACT SYMPTOMS (LUTS) SECONDARY TO BENIGN PROSTATIC HYPERPLASIA","authors":"IU Haq, .. Shahjehan, G. Ghous, HR Asghar, A. Rizwan, U. Hanif","doi":"10.54112/bcsrj.v2024i1.749","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) is a prevalent condition leading to lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) in men, affecting their quality of life. Various medications, including phosphodiesterase five inhibitors (PDE5-Is) and alpha-blockers (ABs), are used for treatment, but direct comparison studies between these drugs are limited. This study aimed to compare the efficacy of sildenafil (PDE5 inhibitor) versus tamsulosin (alpha-blocker) in patients with LUTS secondary to BPH. A randomized controlled trial was conducted at the Department of Urology, KEMU/Affiliated Hospital, Lahore. A sample size of 100 patients (50 in each group) was calculated using the WHO calculator based on expected efficacy rates. Patients aged 40-70 years with BPH and LUTS were included. Exclusion criteria included high PSA levels, history of prostatic surgery, acute urinary retention, or active urinary tract infection. Patients were randomly assigned to receive sildenafil 25mg OD or tamsulosin 0.4mg HS for three months. Efficacy was assessed by changes in the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) after treatment. The demographic characteristics of the study population showed a mean age of 60 years with a similar distribution of comorbidities between the groups. After three months of treatment, 80.9% of patients in the sildenafil group showed a significant improvement in IPSS compared to 55.5% in the tamsulosin group. The chi-square test indicated a significant difference in efficacy between the two groups (p < 0.05). Sildenafil demonstrated superior efficacy compared to tamsulosin in reducing LUTS secondary to BPH. These findings suggest that sildenafil may be considered as a first-line treatment option for patients with BPH and LUTS.","PeriodicalId":504575,"journal":{"name":"Biological and Clinical Sciences Research Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biological and Clinical Sciences Research Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54112/bcsrj.v2024i1.749","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) is a prevalent condition leading to lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) in men, affecting their quality of life. Various medications, including phosphodiesterase five inhibitors (PDE5-Is) and alpha-blockers (ABs), are used for treatment, but direct comparison studies between these drugs are limited. This study aimed to compare the efficacy of sildenafil (PDE5 inhibitor) versus tamsulosin (alpha-blocker) in patients with LUTS secondary to BPH. A randomized controlled trial was conducted at the Department of Urology, KEMU/Affiliated Hospital, Lahore. A sample size of 100 patients (50 in each group) was calculated using the WHO calculator based on expected efficacy rates. Patients aged 40-70 years with BPH and LUTS were included. Exclusion criteria included high PSA levels, history of prostatic surgery, acute urinary retention, or active urinary tract infection. Patients were randomly assigned to receive sildenafil 25mg OD or tamsulosin 0.4mg HS for three months. Efficacy was assessed by changes in the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) after treatment. The demographic characteristics of the study population showed a mean age of 60 years with a similar distribution of comorbidities between the groups. After three months of treatment, 80.9% of patients in the sildenafil group showed a significant improvement in IPSS compared to 55.5% in the tamsulosin group. The chi-square test indicated a significant difference in efficacy between the two groups (p < 0.05). Sildenafil demonstrated superior efficacy compared to tamsulosin in reducing LUTS secondary to BPH. These findings suggest that sildenafil may be considered as a first-line treatment option for patients with BPH and LUTS.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
PDE5抑制剂(西地那非)与α-受体阻滞剂(坦索罗辛)治疗良性前列腺增生继发的下尿路症状(LUTS)的疗效比较
良性前列腺增生症(BPH)是一种导致男性下尿路症状(LUTS)的常见疾病,影响着他们的生活质量。目前有多种药物可用于治疗,包括磷酸二酯酶五抑制剂(PDE5-Is)和α-受体阻滞剂(ABs),但这些药物之间的直接比较研究非常有限。本研究旨在比较西地那非(PDE5 抑制剂)与坦索罗辛(α-受体阻滞剂)对前列腺增生症继发性尿失禁患者的疗效。拉合尔 KEMU 附属医院泌尿科开展了一项随机对照试验。根据预期有效率,使用世界卫生组织计算器计算出了 100 名患者(每组 50 名)的样本量。纳入的患者年龄在 40-70 岁之间,患有良性前列腺增生症和尿失禁。排除标准包括高 PSA 水平、前列腺手术史、急性尿潴留或活动性尿路感染。患者被随机分配接受西地那非 25 毫克口服或他木罗辛 0.4 毫克 HS 治疗,为期三个月。疗效通过治疗后国际前列腺症状评分(IPSS)的变化进行评估。研究对象的人口统计学特征显示,他们的平均年龄为 60 岁,两组之间的合并症分布相似。治疗三个月后,西地那非组 80.9% 的患者 IPSS 有明显改善,而他木罗辛组只有 55.5%。卡方检验表明,两组疗效差异显著(P < 0.05)。与坦索罗辛相比,西地那非在减少良性前列腺增生继发性尿失禁方面的疗效更胜一筹。这些研究结果表明,西地那非可作为良性前列腺增生症合并尿失禁患者的一线治疗选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
DOES PREOPERATIVE COUNSELLING HELP IMPROVE PATIENTS’ SATISFACTION WITH PAIN MANAGEMENT IN POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD SAFETY AND EFFICACY OF DUAL ANTIPLATELET THERAPY IN PAKISTANI PATIENTS UNDERGOING PCI: A MULTICENTER STUDY EVALUATION OF CHICKPEA VARIETIES FOR CLIMATE RESILIENCE AND YIELD STABILITY AT DIFFERENT PLANTING DATES A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF ANESTHETIC BLOCK TECHNIQUES (V-BLOCK VS. H-BLOCK) FOR REMOVAL OF INGROWN TOENAIL ROLE OF CHYMOTRYPSIN IN POST-OPERATIVE WOUND MANAGEMENT IN PATIENTS UNDERGOING ELECTIVE INGUINAL HERNIA REPAIR SURGERIES
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1