DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY OF TIRADS CLASSIFICATION IN DIFFERENTIATING BENIGN AND MALIGNANT THYROID NODULES KEEPING FINE NEEDLE ASPIRATION CYTOLOGY (FNAC) AS GOLD STANDARD

HA Saqib, U. Saeed, M. Zahra, A. Noreen, A. Firdous, Z. Islam
{"title":"DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY OF TIRADS CLASSIFICATION IN DIFFERENTIATING BENIGN AND MALIGNANT THYROID NODULES KEEPING FINE NEEDLE ASPIRATION CYTOLOGY (FNAC) AS GOLD STANDARD","authors":"HA Saqib, U. Saeed, M. Zahra, A. Noreen, A. Firdous, Z. Islam","doi":"10.54112/bcsrj.v2024i1.742","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Thyroid nodules represent a joint clinical presentation of various benign and malignant thyroid diseases. Diagnostic ultrasound, particularly utilizing the Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System (TI-RADS), has emerged as a pivotal tool for stratifying the risk of malignancy in thyroid nodules and guiding decisions regarding fine-needle aspiration biopsy (FNAC). However, comprehensive validation studies are warranted to assess the diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound-based TI-RADS classification compared to FNAC as the gold standard. This cross-sectional validation study, conducted at the Department of Radiology, CPE Institute of Cardiology Multan from August 2, 2021, to February 1, 2022, enrolled 243 patients presenting with thyroid nodules, including multiple and solitary nodules. Baseline demographic variables, including age, gender, and nodule duration, were recorded for each participant. Ultrasonography was performed in all patients, and TI-RADS scores were calculated. Subsequently, fine-needle aspiration biopsies, guided by ultrasound, were obtained in the radiology department and sent to the histopathology department for confirmation of malignancy. The mean age of the cohort was 42.05 ± 12.27 years, with a mean nodule duration of 6.87 ± 3.56 months. The mean TI-RADS score was 3.46 ± 2.00. Of the participants, 176 (72.43%) were male and 67 (27.57%) were female. Malignancy was detected in 84 (34.57%) patients based on TI-RADS score, whereas FNAC confirmed malignancy in 50 (20.58%) patients. Evaluating diagnostic accuracy with FNAC as the gold standard, the TI-RADS score demonstrated a sensitivity of 84.0%, specificity of 78.2%, positive predictive value (PPV) of 50.0%, and negative predictive value (NPV) of 95.0%. Our findings indicate that the TI-RADS scoring system is reliable in predicting malignancy in patients with thyroid nodules. With a sensitivity of 84.0% and specificity of 78.2%, TI-RADS represents a valuable adjunctive tool in the diagnostic algorithm for thyroid nodules, offering considerable potential for improved clinical decision-making and patient management strategies.","PeriodicalId":504575,"journal":{"name":"Biological and Clinical Sciences Research Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biological and Clinical Sciences Research Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54112/bcsrj.v2024i1.742","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Thyroid nodules represent a joint clinical presentation of various benign and malignant thyroid diseases. Diagnostic ultrasound, particularly utilizing the Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System (TI-RADS), has emerged as a pivotal tool for stratifying the risk of malignancy in thyroid nodules and guiding decisions regarding fine-needle aspiration biopsy (FNAC). However, comprehensive validation studies are warranted to assess the diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound-based TI-RADS classification compared to FNAC as the gold standard. This cross-sectional validation study, conducted at the Department of Radiology, CPE Institute of Cardiology Multan from August 2, 2021, to February 1, 2022, enrolled 243 patients presenting with thyroid nodules, including multiple and solitary nodules. Baseline demographic variables, including age, gender, and nodule duration, were recorded for each participant. Ultrasonography was performed in all patients, and TI-RADS scores were calculated. Subsequently, fine-needle aspiration biopsies, guided by ultrasound, were obtained in the radiology department and sent to the histopathology department for confirmation of malignancy. The mean age of the cohort was 42.05 ± 12.27 years, with a mean nodule duration of 6.87 ± 3.56 months. The mean TI-RADS score was 3.46 ± 2.00. Of the participants, 176 (72.43%) were male and 67 (27.57%) were female. Malignancy was detected in 84 (34.57%) patients based on TI-RADS score, whereas FNAC confirmed malignancy in 50 (20.58%) patients. Evaluating diagnostic accuracy with FNAC as the gold standard, the TI-RADS score demonstrated a sensitivity of 84.0%, specificity of 78.2%, positive predictive value (PPV) of 50.0%, and negative predictive value (NPV) of 95.0%. Our findings indicate that the TI-RADS scoring system is reliable in predicting malignancy in patients with thyroid nodules. With a sensitivity of 84.0% and specificity of 78.2%, TI-RADS represents a valuable adjunctive tool in the diagnostic algorithm for thyroid nodules, offering considerable potential for improved clinical decision-making and patient management strategies.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
以细针穿刺细胞学(Fnac)为金标准,Tirads分类法在区分甲状腺结节良恶性方面的诊断准确性
甲状腺结节是各种良性和恶性甲状腺疾病的共同临床表现。超声诊断,尤其是利用甲状腺成像报告和数据系统(TI-RADS),已成为甲状腺结节恶性风险分层和指导细针穿刺活检(FNAC)决策的重要工具。然而,与作为金标准的 FNAC 相比,基于超声的 TI-RADS 分类需要进行全面的验证研究,以评估其诊断准确性。这项横断面验证研究于 2021 年 8 月 2 日至 2022 年 2 月 1 日在木尔坦 CPE 心脏病研究所放射科进行,共招募了 243 名甲状腺结节(包括多发和单发结节)患者。研究人员记录了每位参与者的基线人口统计学变量,包括年龄、性别和结节持续时间。对所有患者进行了超声检查,并计算了 TI-RADS 评分。随后,放射科在超声引导下进行细针穿刺活检,并将活检结果送至组织病理科确认是否为恶性肿瘤。患者的平均年龄为(42.05±12.27)岁,平均结节持续时间为(6.87±3.56)个月。平均 TI-RADS 评分为 3.46 ± 2.00。参与者中,男性 176 人(72.43%),女性 67 人(27.57%)。根据 TI-RADS 评分,84 例(34.57%)患者发现了恶性肿瘤,而 50 例(20.58%)患者的 FNAC 证实了恶性肿瘤。以 FNAC 作为金标准来评估诊断准确性,TI-RADS 评分的敏感性为 84.0%,特异性为 78.2%,阳性预测值 (PPV) 为 50.0%,阴性预测值 (NPV) 为 95.0%。我们的研究结果表明,TI-RADS评分系统能可靠地预测甲状腺结节患者的恶性程度。TI-RADS 的灵敏度为 84.0%,特异性为 78.2%,是甲状腺结节诊断算法中的重要辅助工具,为改善临床决策和患者管理策略提供了巨大潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
DOES PREOPERATIVE COUNSELLING HELP IMPROVE PATIENTS’ SATISFACTION WITH PAIN MANAGEMENT IN POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD SAFETY AND EFFICACY OF DUAL ANTIPLATELET THERAPY IN PAKISTANI PATIENTS UNDERGOING PCI: A MULTICENTER STUDY EVALUATION OF CHICKPEA VARIETIES FOR CLIMATE RESILIENCE AND YIELD STABILITY AT DIFFERENT PLANTING DATES A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF ANESTHETIC BLOCK TECHNIQUES (V-BLOCK VS. H-BLOCK) FOR REMOVAL OF INGROWN TOENAIL ROLE OF CHYMOTRYPSIN IN POST-OPERATIVE WOUND MANAGEMENT IN PATIENTS UNDERGOING ELECTIVE INGUINAL HERNIA REPAIR SURGERIES
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1