Scoping review of kindergarten research involving the Classroom Assessment Scoring System (CLASS) in Mainland China

IF 2.3 3区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Asia Pacific Education Review Pub Date : 2024-03-10 DOI:10.1007/s12564-024-09934-9
Xiaozi Gao, Echo Li, Alfredo Bautista, Kerry Lee, Jin Sun
{"title":"Scoping review of kindergarten research involving the Classroom Assessment Scoring System (CLASS) in Mainland China","authors":"Xiaozi Gao,&nbsp;Echo Li,&nbsp;Alfredo Bautista,&nbsp;Kerry Lee,&nbsp;Jin Sun","doi":"10.1007/s12564-024-09934-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Like many countries, Mainland China is committed to improving process quality in kindergartens (children aged 3 to 6), specifically the quality of teacher–child interactions. The Classroom Assessment Scoring System (CLASS; Pianta, 2008, in Classroom Assessment Scoring System™: Manual K-3, Paul H Brookes Publishing, Baltimore) is a widely used tool to assess and potentially improve interactional quality. While CLASS has been increasingly used by researchers in China, much of the literature has been published in the Chinese language and, thus, is inaccessible to international readers. To overcome this barrier, this scoping review analyzes existing empirical research involving CLASS in Chinese kindergartens. Publications in English and Chinese were considered. Fifty-five peer-reviewed articles published between 2008 and 2023 were included. Most studies were conducted in public kindergartens in urban areas and developed regions of China, adopting quantitative research designs with relatively small sample sizes. We identified six different types of research purposes. Many of the available studies did not follow established CLASS procedures. We conclude that the evidence available for enhancing teacher–child interactional quality and supporting policy reforms in China remains somewhat weak. We encourage Chinese researchers and policymakers to implement CLASS in large-scale teacher performance evaluations and professional development studies.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":47344,"journal":{"name":"Asia Pacific Education Review","volume":"27 1","pages":"365 - 380"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s12564-024-09934-9.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asia Pacific Education Review","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12564-024-09934-9","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Like many countries, Mainland China is committed to improving process quality in kindergartens (children aged 3 to 6), specifically the quality of teacher–child interactions. The Classroom Assessment Scoring System (CLASS; Pianta, 2008, in Classroom Assessment Scoring System™: Manual K-3, Paul H Brookes Publishing, Baltimore) is a widely used tool to assess and potentially improve interactional quality. While CLASS has been increasingly used by researchers in China, much of the literature has been published in the Chinese language and, thus, is inaccessible to international readers. To overcome this barrier, this scoping review analyzes existing empirical research involving CLASS in Chinese kindergartens. Publications in English and Chinese were considered. Fifty-five peer-reviewed articles published between 2008 and 2023 were included. Most studies were conducted in public kindergartens in urban areas and developed regions of China, adopting quantitative research designs with relatively small sample sizes. We identified six different types of research purposes. Many of the available studies did not follow established CLASS procedures. We conclude that the evidence available for enhancing teacher–child interactional quality and supporting policy reforms in China remains somewhat weak. We encourage Chinese researchers and policymakers to implement CLASS in large-scale teacher performance evaluations and professional development studies.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
中国大陆幼儿园课堂评估计分系统(CLASS)研究综述
与许多国家一样,中国大陆致力于提高幼儿园(3至6岁儿童)的过程质量,特别是师生互动的质量。课堂评估评分系统(CLASS; Pianta, 2008, in Classroom Assessment Scoring System™:Manual K-3, Paul H Brookes Publishing, Baltimore)是一种广泛使用的评估和潜在改善互动质量的工具。虽然中国的研究人员越来越多地使用CLASS,但大部分文献都是用中文发表的,因此国际读者无法访问。为了克服这一障碍,本文对现有的关于中国幼儿园CLASS的实证研究进行了分析。审议了英文和中文出版物。收录了2008年至2023年间发表的55篇同行评议文章。大多数研究在中国城市地区和发达地区的公立幼儿园进行,采用定量研究设计,样本量相对较小。我们确定了六种不同类型的研究目的。许多可用的研究没有遵循既定的CLASS程序。我们的结论是,中国提高师生互动质量和支持政策改革的现有证据仍然有些薄弱。我们鼓励中国的研究人员和政策制定者在大规模的教师绩效评估和专业发展研究中实施CLASS。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Asia Pacific Education Review
Asia Pacific Education Review EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
4.30%
发文量
64
期刊介绍: The Asia Pacific Education Review (APER) aims to stimulate research, encourage academic exchange, and enhance the professional development of scholars and other researchers who are interested in educational and cultural issues in the Asia Pacific region. APER covers all areas of educational research, with a focus on cross-cultural, comparative and other studies with a broad Asia-Pacific context. APER is a peer reviewed journal produced by the Education Research Institute at Seoul National University. It was founded by the Institute of Asia Pacific Education Development, Seoul National University in 2000, which is owned and operated by Education Research Institute at Seoul National University since 2003. APER requires all submitted manuscripts to follow the seventh edition of the Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association (APA; http://www.apastyle.org/index.aspx).
期刊最新文献
Inquiry in the Asia–Pacific: reflections on contextuality and interdependence Peace education research in East Asia, 2020–2025: key works published in Chinese, Japanese, and Korean Facilitating Conditions and Challenges for Stakeholders’ Uptake of the Affordances of E-Portfolio Assessment at a Hong Kong University Choosing a U.S. branch campus in Korea: a case study of Korean students’ decision-making through the trilateral push–pull model Exploring links between feedback, emotions, and behavioral engagement in secondary school Singaporean students
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1