The educational value of artificial intelligence in higher education: a 10-year systematic literature review

IF 3.5 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Interactive Technology and Smart Education Pub Date : 2024-03-08 DOI:10.1108/itse-11-2023-0218
A. Marengo, Alessandro Pagano, Jenny Pange, K. A. Soomro
{"title":"The educational value of artificial intelligence in higher education: a 10-year systematic literature review","authors":"A. Marengo, Alessandro Pagano, Jenny Pange, K. A. Soomro","doi":"10.1108/itse-11-2023-0218","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThis paper aims to consolidate empirical studies between 2013 and 2022 to investigate the impact of artificial intelligence (AI) in higher education. It aims to examine published research characteristics and provide insights into the promises and challenges of AI integration in academia.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nA systematic literature review was conducted, encompassing 44 empirical studies published as peer-reviewed journal papers. The review focused on identifying trends, categorizing research types and analysing the evidence-based applications of AI in higher education.\n\n\nFindings\nThe review indicates a recent surge in publications concerning AI in higher education. However, a significant proportion of these publications primarily propose theoretical and conceptual AI interventions. Areas with empirical evidence supporting AI applications in academia are delineated.\n\n\nResearch limitations/implications\nThe prevalence of theoretical proposals may limit generalizability. Further research is encouraged to validate and expand upon the identified empirical applications of AI in higher education.\n\n\nPractical implications\nThis review outlines imperative implications for future research and the implementation of evidence-based AI interventions in higher education, facilitating informed decision-making for academia and stakeholders.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nThis paper contributes a comprehensive synthesis of empirical studies, highlighting the evolving landscape of AI integration in higher education and emphasizing the need for evidence-based approaches.\n","PeriodicalId":44954,"journal":{"name":"Interactive Technology and Smart Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Interactive Technology and Smart Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/itse-11-2023-0218","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose This paper aims to consolidate empirical studies between 2013 and 2022 to investigate the impact of artificial intelligence (AI) in higher education. It aims to examine published research characteristics and provide insights into the promises and challenges of AI integration in academia. Design/methodology/approach A systematic literature review was conducted, encompassing 44 empirical studies published as peer-reviewed journal papers. The review focused on identifying trends, categorizing research types and analysing the evidence-based applications of AI in higher education. Findings The review indicates a recent surge in publications concerning AI in higher education. However, a significant proportion of these publications primarily propose theoretical and conceptual AI interventions. Areas with empirical evidence supporting AI applications in academia are delineated. Research limitations/implications The prevalence of theoretical proposals may limit generalizability. Further research is encouraged to validate and expand upon the identified empirical applications of AI in higher education. Practical implications This review outlines imperative implications for future research and the implementation of evidence-based AI interventions in higher education, facilitating informed decision-making for academia and stakeholders. Originality/value This paper contributes a comprehensive synthesis of empirical studies, highlighting the evolving landscape of AI integration in higher education and emphasizing the need for evidence-based approaches.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
人工智能在高等教育中的教育价值:10 年系统文献综述
目的 本文旨在整合 2013 年至 2022 年间的实证研究,调查人工智能(AI)对高等教育的影响。设计/方法/途径进行了系统的文献综述,其中包括 44 篇以同行评审期刊论文形式发表的实证研究。综述的重点是确定趋势,对研究类型进行分类,并分析人工智能在高等教育中的循证应用。然而,这些出版物中有很大一部分主要提出了理论性和概念性的人工智能干预措施。研究的局限性/影响理论性建议的盛行可能会限制其普遍性。鼓励开展进一步研究,以验证和扩展已确定的人工智能在高等教育中的实证应用。本综述概述了未来研究和在高等教育中实施基于证据的人工智能干预措施的重要意义,有助于学术界和利益相关者做出知情决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Interactive Technology and Smart Education
Interactive Technology and Smart Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
12.00
自引率
2.30%
发文量
30
期刊介绍: Interactive Technology and Smart Education (ITSE) is a multi-disciplinary, peer-reviewed journal, which provides a distinct forum to specially promote innovation and participative research approaches. The following terms are defined, as used in the context of this journal: -Interactive Technology refers to all forms of digital technology, as described above, emphasizing innovation and human-/user-centred approaches. -Smart Education "SMART" is used as an acronym that refers to interactive technology that offers a more flexible and tailored approach to meet diverse individual requirements by being “Sensitive, Manageable, Adaptable, Responsive and Timely” to educators’ pedagogical strategies and learners’ educational and social needs’. -Articles are invited that explore innovative use of educational technologies that advance interactive technology in general and its applications in education in particular. The journal aims to bridge gaps in the field by promoting design research, action research, and continuous evaluation as an integral part of the development cycle of usable solutions/systems.
期刊最新文献
Using epistemic network analysis to examine how different fantasy contexts affect online gamified class students’ behavioral engagement Using epistemic network analysis to examine how different fantasy contexts affect online gamified class students’ behavioral engagement Investigating in-service teachers’ views on ChatGPT integration From traditional to virtual classrooms: unravelling themes and shaping the future of metaverse education Effects of jigsaw learning strategy integrated with computer simulations on grade 10 students’ achievement and attitude and their correlations in chemistry
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1