DeltaLCA: Comparative Life-Cycle Assessment for Electronics Design

Zhihang Zhang, Felix Hähnlein, Yuxuan Mei, Zachary Englhardt, Shwetak Patel, Adriana Schulz, Vikram Iyer
{"title":"DeltaLCA: Comparative Life-Cycle Assessment for Electronics Design","authors":"Zhihang Zhang, Felix Hähnlein, Yuxuan Mei, Zachary Englhardt, Shwetak Patel, Adriana Schulz, Vikram Iyer","doi":"10.1145/3643561","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Reducing the environmental footprint of electronics and computing devices requires new tools that empower designers to make informed decisions about sustainability during the design process itself. This is not possible with current tools for life cycle assessment (LCA) which require substantial domain expertise and time to evaluate the numerous chips and other components that make up a device. We observe first that informed decision-making does not require absolute metrics and can instead be done by comparing designs. Second, we can use domain-specific heuristics to perform these comparisons. We combine these insights to develop DeltaLCA, an open-source interactive design tool that addresses the dual challenges of automating life cycle inventory generation and data availability by performing comparative analyses of electronics designs. Users can upload standard design files from Electronic Design Automation (EDA) software and the tool will guide them through determining which one has greater carbon footprints. DeltaLCA leverages electronics-specific LCA datasets and heuristics and tries to automatically rank the two designs, prompting users to provide additional information only when necessary. We show through case studies DeltaLCA achieves the same result as evaluating full LCAs, and that it accelerates LCA comparisons from eight expert-hours to a single click for devices with ~30 components, and 15 minutes for more complex devices with ~100 components.","PeriodicalId":20463,"journal":{"name":"Proc. ACM Interact. Mob. Wearable Ubiquitous Technol.","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proc. ACM Interact. Mob. Wearable Ubiquitous Technol.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3643561","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Reducing the environmental footprint of electronics and computing devices requires new tools that empower designers to make informed decisions about sustainability during the design process itself. This is not possible with current tools for life cycle assessment (LCA) which require substantial domain expertise and time to evaluate the numerous chips and other components that make up a device. We observe first that informed decision-making does not require absolute metrics and can instead be done by comparing designs. Second, we can use domain-specific heuristics to perform these comparisons. We combine these insights to develop DeltaLCA, an open-source interactive design tool that addresses the dual challenges of automating life cycle inventory generation and data availability by performing comparative analyses of electronics designs. Users can upload standard design files from Electronic Design Automation (EDA) software and the tool will guide them through determining which one has greater carbon footprints. DeltaLCA leverages electronics-specific LCA datasets and heuristics and tries to automatically rank the two designs, prompting users to provide additional information only when necessary. We show through case studies DeltaLCA achieves the same result as evaluating full LCAs, and that it accelerates LCA comparisons from eight expert-hours to a single click for devices with ~30 components, and 15 minutes for more complex devices with ~100 components.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
DeltaLCA:电子设计生命周期比较评估
减少电子和计算设备的环境足迹需要新的工具,使设计人员能够在设计过程中就可持续发展做出明智的决定。目前的生命周期评估(LCA)工具无法做到这一点,因为这些工具需要大量的专业领域知识和时间来评估构成设备的众多芯片和其他组件。我们首先发现,明智的决策并不需要绝对的指标,而是可以通过比较设计来实现。其次,我们可以使用特定领域的启发式方法来进行这些比较。我们将这些见解结合起来,开发出了开源交互式设计工具 DeltaLCA,通过对电子设计进行比较分析,解决了自动生成生命周期清单和数据可用性的双重挑战。用户可以从电子设计自动化 (EDA) 软件上传标准设计文件,该工具将引导用户确定哪种设计的碳足迹更大。DeltaLCA 利用电子产品特有的生命周期评估数据集和启发式方法,自动对两种设计进行排序,仅在必要时提示用户提供额外信息。我们通过案例研究表明,DeltaLCA 可实现与评估完整生命周期评估相同的结果,而且它可加快生命周期评估比较的速度,对于约 30 个组件的设备,只需点击一下鼠标即可完成,而对于约 100 个组件的更复杂设备,只需点击一下鼠标即可完成。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Multi-Subject 3D Human Mesh Construction Using Commodity WiFi UHead: Driver Attention Monitoring System Using UWB Radar DeltaLCA: Comparative Life-Cycle Assessment for Electronics Design Multimodal Daily-Life Logging in Free-living Environment Using Non-Visual Egocentric Sensors on a Smartphone Lateralization Effects in Electrodermal Activity Data Collected Using Wearable Devices
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1