Light and Dark Mode: A Comparison Between Android and iOS App UI Modes and Interviews with App Designers and Developers

Sarah Andrew, Chelsea Bishop, Garreth W. Tigwell
{"title":"Light and Dark Mode: A Comparison Between Android and iOS App UI Modes and Interviews with App Designers and Developers","authors":"Sarah Andrew, Chelsea Bishop, Garreth W. Tigwell","doi":"10.1145/3643539","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Mobile app light and dark modes offer improved usability within different contexts (e.g., dark mode for easier night reading). Yet, little research has investigated the prevalence of light and dark modes across platforms, the intricacies of UI color changes, and challenges in the design and development process. Our investigation focused on comparing light and dark mode designs. We carried out a manual inspection of 120 popular Android and iOS apps to find that only 55% (Android) and 48% (iOS) of the apps included any modes. We also found significant variability in how many UI elements changed between modes. We interviewed 15 designers and developers to understand the creative process, motivations for design decisions, and what challenges exist in the processes that affect alternative mode implementation. We identified several issues that HCI researchers are equipped to solve, ultimately improving support for mobile app creators looking to implement dark modes (and beyond) for increased mobile usability in different contexts.","PeriodicalId":20463,"journal":{"name":"Proc. ACM Interact. Mob. Wearable Ubiquitous Technol.","volume":"30 12","pages":"32:1-32:23"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proc. ACM Interact. Mob. Wearable Ubiquitous Technol.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3643539","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Mobile app light and dark modes offer improved usability within different contexts (e.g., dark mode for easier night reading). Yet, little research has investigated the prevalence of light and dark modes across platforms, the intricacies of UI color changes, and challenges in the design and development process. Our investigation focused on comparing light and dark mode designs. We carried out a manual inspection of 120 popular Android and iOS apps to find that only 55% (Android) and 48% (iOS) of the apps included any modes. We also found significant variability in how many UI elements changed between modes. We interviewed 15 designers and developers to understand the creative process, motivations for design decisions, and what challenges exist in the processes that affect alternative mode implementation. We identified several issues that HCI researchers are equipped to solve, ultimately improving support for mobile app creators looking to implement dark modes (and beyond) for increased mobile usability in different contexts.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
明暗模式:安卓和 iOS 应用程序 UI 模式比较以及对应用程序设计师和开发人员的访谈
移动应用程序的明暗模式可在不同环境下提高可用性(例如,暗模式便于夜间阅读)。然而,关于明暗模式在不同平台上的流行程度、用户界面颜色变化的复杂性以及设计和开发过程中的挑战等方面的研究却很少。我们的调查重点是比较明暗模式设计。我们对 120 个流行的安卓和 iOS 应用程序进行了人工检查,发现只有 55% (安卓)和 48% (iOS)的应用程序包含任何模式。我们还发现,在不同模式下,用户界面元素的变化也存在很大差异。我们采访了 15 位设计师和开发人员,以了解创意过程、设计决策的动机以及影响替代模式实施的过程中存在的挑战。我们发现了人机交互研究人员有能力解决的几个问题,最终改善了对移动应用程序创建者的支持,这些创建者希望实施暗模式(以及其他模式)以提高不同环境下的移动可用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Multi-Subject 3D Human Mesh Construction Using Commodity WiFi UHead: Driver Attention Monitoring System Using UWB Radar DeltaLCA: Comparative Life-Cycle Assessment for Electronics Design Multimodal Daily-Life Logging in Free-living Environment Using Non-Visual Egocentric Sensors on a Smartphone Lateralization Effects in Electrodermal Activity Data Collected Using Wearable Devices
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1