For a nomad ontology against academic citizenship

Andrew Gibson
{"title":"For a nomad ontology against academic citizenship","authors":"Andrew Gibson","doi":"10.47989/kpdc500","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper argues against the apparently benign concept of ‘academic citizenship,’ drawing on resources and conceptual precedents from within higher education generally and philosophy specifically. It does so not only in order to offer a critique, however. By considering the directions from which criticism can be levelled at the notion of ‘citizenship’, and the State-centric conceptualisation of the university underlying it, an argument for an alternative conceptualisation of academic being is offered. Ontology is suggested as a suitable route to dealing with the urgency of the questions confronting those inhabiting contemporary higher education. Drawing on the work of Gilles Deleuze and Félix Guattari, along with Isabelle Stengers, it proposes a ‘nomad ontology’ as both a form of analysis and possible mode of being for academics.","PeriodicalId":413842,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Praxis in Higher Education","volume":"1 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Praxis in Higher Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47989/kpdc500","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper argues against the apparently benign concept of ‘academic citizenship,’ drawing on resources and conceptual precedents from within higher education generally and philosophy specifically. It does so not only in order to offer a critique, however. By considering the directions from which criticism can be levelled at the notion of ‘citizenship’, and the State-centric conceptualisation of the university underlying it, an argument for an alternative conceptualisation of academic being is offered. Ontology is suggested as a suitable route to dealing with the urgency of the questions confronting those inhabiting contemporary higher education. Drawing on the work of Gilles Deleuze and Félix Guattari, along with Isabelle Stengers, it proposes a ‘nomad ontology’ as both a form of analysis and possible mode of being for academics.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
支持游牧本体论,反对学术公民权
本文借鉴高等教育和哲学领域的资源和概念先例,对 "学术公民 "这一看似善意的概念进行了反驳。然而,本文这样做不仅仅是为了提出批评。通过考虑对 "公民权 "概念及其背后以国家为中心的大学概念提出批评的方向,为学术存在的另一种概念化提供了论据。本体论被认为是处理当代高等教育所面临的紧迫问题的合适途径。文章借鉴了吉尔-德勒兹(Gilles Deleuze)、费利克斯-瓜塔里(Félix Guattari)以及伊莎贝尔-斯特恩斯(Isabelle Stengers)的研究成果,提出了一种 "游牧本体论",既是一种分析形式,也是学术存在的可能模式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Critiquing the sacred and the profane in higher education Can we please stop talking about 'Bildung'—and for that matter, too, 'the Humboldtian university'? Tapu-gogy: Confining profane pedagogy to a new sacredness beyond the educator’s reach Why critique the sacred and the profane in higher education: In conversation with Professor Bruce Macfarlane Laure and Bataille as educators: On the useless value of sacred experiences
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1