Critiquing the sacred and the profane in higher education

Trine Fossland, Laura Louise Sarauw, Emily Danvers
{"title":"Critiquing the sacred and the profane in higher education","authors":"Trine Fossland, Laura Louise Sarauw, Emily Danvers","doi":"10.47989/kpdc558","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper sets the stage for an examination of ‘critiquing the sacred and profane in higher education,’ outlining the motivation for exploring collective contribution to the field of higher education studies. Specifically, this paper states that the taken-for-granted concepts that frame academic praxis serve as conceptual lenses to critically evaluate how the academy’s principles and practices are formed and reconstructed over time and across contexts. Paying attention to what is considered sacred (and by whom) and, conversely, what is considered profane reveals a story of what and who is valued and the histories, discourse, and power relations that inform these differential notions of ‘sacredness’. The articles within this special issue collectively illuminate the inherent ambiguity of academic concepts, showcasing their diverse interpretations and the significant implications these hold for higher education practices across different contexts, inviting readers to engage with the complexities and nuances that shape the field.","PeriodicalId":413842,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Praxis in Higher Education","volume":" 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Praxis in Higher Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47989/kpdc558","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper sets the stage for an examination of ‘critiquing the sacred and profane in higher education,’ outlining the motivation for exploring collective contribution to the field of higher education studies. Specifically, this paper states that the taken-for-granted concepts that frame academic praxis serve as conceptual lenses to critically evaluate how the academy’s principles and practices are formed and reconstructed over time and across contexts. Paying attention to what is considered sacred (and by whom) and, conversely, what is considered profane reveals a story of what and who is valued and the histories, discourse, and power relations that inform these differential notions of ‘sacredness’. The articles within this special issue collectively illuminate the inherent ambiguity of academic concepts, showcasing their diverse interpretations and the significant implications these hold for higher education practices across different contexts, inviting readers to engage with the complexities and nuances that shape the field.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
批判高等教育中的神圣与亵渎
本文为研究 "批判高等教育中的神圣与亵渎 "奠定了基础,并概述了探索高等教育研究领域集体贡献的动机。具体而言,本文指出,学术实践中那些理所当然的概念可以作为概念透镜,用于批判性地评估学术原则和实践是如何随着时间的推移和环境的变化而形成和重构的。关注什么被认为是神圣的(以及被谁认为是神圣的),反之,什么被认为是亵渎的,这揭示了什么和谁被重视,以及这些不同的 "神圣 "概念所蕴含的历史、话语和权力关系。本特刊中的文章共同揭示了学术概念固有的模糊性,展示了它们的不同解释以及这些解释在不同背景下对高等教育实践的重要影响,并邀请读者参与到塑造这一领域的复杂性和细微差别中来。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Critiquing the sacred and the profane in higher education Can we please stop talking about 'Bildung'—and for that matter, too, 'the Humboldtian university'? Tapu-gogy: Confining profane pedagogy to a new sacredness beyond the educator’s reach Why critique the sacred and the profane in higher education: In conversation with Professor Bruce Macfarlane Laure and Bataille as educators: On the useless value of sacred experiences
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1