EFFECT OF DIFFERENT PROCESSING METHODS ON THE PROXIMATE COMPOSITION, MINERAL, AND ORGANOLEPTIC PROPERTIES OF DOMESTICATED GRASSCUTTER (Thryonomys swinderianus)

T. Adebowale, B. B. Ibiyomi, O. Akintunde, O. O. Oduntan, T. B. Ajibade
{"title":"EFFECT OF DIFFERENT PROCESSING METHODS ON THE PROXIMATE COMPOSITION, MINERAL, AND ORGANOLEPTIC PROPERTIES OF DOMESTICATED GRASSCUTTER (Thryonomys swinderianus)","authors":"T. Adebowale, B. B. Ibiyomi, O. Akintunde, O. O. Oduntan, T. B. Ajibade","doi":"10.33003/fjs-2024-0801-1394","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Wildlife plays a crucial role in supplying energy, protein, and various components essential for human diets in tropical regions. In urban areas, there is still substantial consumption of bush meat, such as grasscutter, which serves as a significant source of nutrition. The study examined the proximate composition, mineral content, and sensory properties of processed grasscutter (Thryonomys swinderianus) meat using three distinct preparation methods. The grasscutter samples were acquired from the Department of Forestry and Wildlife Management at the Federal University of Agriculture, Abeokuta, Nigeria. The meat underwent smoking, boiling, and oven drying after slaughtering and washing. A portion of each processed grasscutter meat was collected, placed in sterile containers, and transported to the laboratory for proximate and mineral analysis. A questionnaire was employed for organoleptic evaluation and twelve taste panelists comprising randomly selected students, non-academic staff members, and lecturers from the department participated in the assessment. The proximate analysis followed the standard procedure outlined in the AOAC method (2005). Results indicated that the crude protein content was 20.06% for smoked and 16.40% for oven-dried grasscutter meat. The oven-dried meat exhibited lower fat content. Sensory evaluation suggested that oven-dried meat was perceived as the most favorable, with the highest mean values for aroma (8.42±0.26), taste (7.67±0.36), flavor (8.42±0.99), texture (7.67±0.36), acceptability (7.67±0.36), and the lowest for odor (2.08±0.31) compared to boiled and smoked samples. Moreover, oven-dried grasscutter meat demonstrated elevated levels of magnesium (7.45%) and potassium (27.43%). It is therefore recommended that the oven drying method of meat processing should be...","PeriodicalId":282447,"journal":{"name":"FUDMA JOURNAL OF SCIENCES","volume":"35 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"FUDMA JOURNAL OF SCIENCES","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33003/fjs-2024-0801-1394","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Wildlife plays a crucial role in supplying energy, protein, and various components essential for human diets in tropical regions. In urban areas, there is still substantial consumption of bush meat, such as grasscutter, which serves as a significant source of nutrition. The study examined the proximate composition, mineral content, and sensory properties of processed grasscutter (Thryonomys swinderianus) meat using three distinct preparation methods. The grasscutter samples were acquired from the Department of Forestry and Wildlife Management at the Federal University of Agriculture, Abeokuta, Nigeria. The meat underwent smoking, boiling, and oven drying after slaughtering and washing. A portion of each processed grasscutter meat was collected, placed in sterile containers, and transported to the laboratory for proximate and mineral analysis. A questionnaire was employed for organoleptic evaluation and twelve taste panelists comprising randomly selected students, non-academic staff members, and lecturers from the department participated in the assessment. The proximate analysis followed the standard procedure outlined in the AOAC method (2005). Results indicated that the crude protein content was 20.06% for smoked and 16.40% for oven-dried grasscutter meat. The oven-dried meat exhibited lower fat content. Sensory evaluation suggested that oven-dried meat was perceived as the most favorable, with the highest mean values for aroma (8.42±0.26), taste (7.67±0.36), flavor (8.42±0.99), texture (7.67±0.36), acceptability (7.67±0.36), and the lowest for odor (2.08±0.31) compared to boiled and smoked samples. Moreover, oven-dried grasscutter meat demonstrated elevated levels of magnesium (7.45%) and potassium (27.43%). It is therefore recommended that the oven drying method of meat processing should be...
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
不同加工方法对家养草鱼(Thryonomys swinderianus)的基本成分、矿物质和有机物特性的影响
在热带地区,野生动物在提供人类饮食所必需的能量、蛋白质和各种成分方面发挥着至关重要的作用。在城市地区,人们仍然大量食用草鸡等灌木肉,它们是重要的营养来源。这项研究采用三种不同的制备方法,检测了加工草utter(Thryonomys swinderianus)肉的近似成分、矿物质含量和感官特性。草鸡样品来自尼日利亚阿贝奥库塔联邦农业大学林业和野生动物管理系。屠宰和清洗后的草鸡肉经过熏制、煮沸和烘箱干燥。收集每份加工好的草雕肉,放入无菌容器中,然后运到实验室进行近似物和矿物质分析。感官评估采用了问卷调查的方式,由随机抽取的学生、非学术人员和该系讲师组成的 12 位品尝小组成员参与了评估。近似物分析采用了 AOAC 方法(2005 年)中规定的标准程序。结果表明,熏制和烘干的草剪肉的粗蛋白含量分别为 20.06%和 16.40%。烘干肉的脂肪含量较低。感官评价表明,与水煮和烟熏样品相比,烤干肉的香气(8.42±0.26)、口感(7.67±0.36)、风味(8.42±0.99)、质地(7.67±0.36)和可接受性(7.67±0.36)的平均值最高,而气味(2.08±0.31)的平均值最低。此外,烤干的脆鲩肉中的镁(7.45%)和钾(27.43%)含量较高。因此,建议采用烘箱干燥法加工肉类...
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
MONITORING CLIMATE EXTREME EVENTS TREND IN NIGERIA USING CLIMPACT2 SOFTWARE LONG SHORT-TERM MEMORY RECURRENT NEURAL NETWORKS FOR SHORT-TERM TRAFFIC PREDICTION AT ROAD INTERSECTIONS COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF CONTINUOUS PROBABILITY DISTRIBUTIONS FOR MODELING MAXIMUM FLOOD LEVELS QUALITY ASSESSMENT AND SAFETY OF COMMERCIALLY SOLD STEAK MEAT “SUYA” IN IBADAN METROPOLIS: A MENACE TO PUBLIC HEALTH LOCAL AND GLOBAL STABILITY ANALYSIS OF MEASLES EPIDEMIC MODEL AT DISEASE-FREE EQUILIBRIUM
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1