Enhancing student’s conceptual understanding on the patterns of Mendelian genetics through task-based learning

Emmylou Aspacio Borja, Romel C. Mutya
{"title":"Enhancing student’s conceptual understanding on the patterns of Mendelian genetics through task-based learning","authors":"Emmylou Aspacio Borja, Romel C. Mutya","doi":"10.22219/jpbi.v10i1.29924","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Mendelian genetics are essential for students seeking to comprehend the complexities of inheritance; although fundamental, these biology concepts are difficult for students to understand. This study examined the effectiveness of task-based learning (TBL) in enhancing the students' conceptual understanding of the Patterns of Mendelian Genetics. A pretest and posttest quasi-experimental research design involved an experimental and a control group. An Intrinsic Motivation Inventory questionnaire was utilized to assess the level of intrinsic motivation for task evaluation for the experimental group. Paired t-test was used to compare the pretest and post-test results. Before the intervention, both groups had a low conceptual understanding of the topic. At the end of the intervention, both groups had significantly increased their performances from pretest to posttest scores. The study revealed that TBL is more effective than Traditional Lecture-Based Instruction (TLI), as seen in their enhanced student performance, implying the effectiveness of the TBL as an innovative instructional approach. Participants from the experimental group expressed enjoyment, competence, and ownership of their task activities, and they did not feel nervous and anxious about doing the tasks. Pearson r-correlation was used to establish a relationship among the variables. Perceived choice, pressure/tension, and student performance in the experimental group have low positive correlations, and perceived choice, interest/enjoyment, and performance have a negligible correlation. This approach is highly commendable for biology instruction. By illuminating the effectiveness of active learning in improving student’s conceptual understanding, this study bridges the gap between theoretical-practical gap in genetics via active learning effectiveness.","PeriodicalId":512736,"journal":{"name":"JPBI (Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi Indonesia)","volume":"18 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JPBI (Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi Indonesia)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22219/jpbi.v10i1.29924","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Mendelian genetics are essential for students seeking to comprehend the complexities of inheritance; although fundamental, these biology concepts are difficult for students to understand. This study examined the effectiveness of task-based learning (TBL) in enhancing the students' conceptual understanding of the Patterns of Mendelian Genetics. A pretest and posttest quasi-experimental research design involved an experimental and a control group. An Intrinsic Motivation Inventory questionnaire was utilized to assess the level of intrinsic motivation for task evaluation for the experimental group. Paired t-test was used to compare the pretest and post-test results. Before the intervention, both groups had a low conceptual understanding of the topic. At the end of the intervention, both groups had significantly increased their performances from pretest to posttest scores. The study revealed that TBL is more effective than Traditional Lecture-Based Instruction (TLI), as seen in their enhanced student performance, implying the effectiveness of the TBL as an innovative instructional approach. Participants from the experimental group expressed enjoyment, competence, and ownership of their task activities, and they did not feel nervous and anxious about doing the tasks. Pearson r-correlation was used to establish a relationship among the variables. Perceived choice, pressure/tension, and student performance in the experimental group have low positive correlations, and perceived choice, interest/enjoyment, and performance have a negligible correlation. This approach is highly commendable for biology instruction. By illuminating the effectiveness of active learning in improving student’s conceptual understanding, this study bridges the gap between theoretical-practical gap in genetics via active learning effectiveness.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
通过任务型学习加深学生对孟德尔遗传学规律的概念理解
孟德尔遗传学对于试图理解复杂遗传的学生来说至关重要;尽管这些生物学概念是基础,但学生却很难理解。本研究探讨了任务型学习(TBL)在增强学生对孟德尔遗传学模式的概念理解方面的有效性。实验组和对照组采用前测和后测准实验研究设计。实验组利用内在动机量表来评估任务评价的内在动机水平。采用配对 t 检验比较前测和后测结果。干预前,两组学生对主题的概念理解程度都较低。在干预结束时,两组学生的成绩都比前测后测有明显提高。研究显示,TBL 比传统的讲授式教学(TLI)更有效,这从学生成绩的提高可以看出,这意味着 TBL 作为一种创新的教学方法是有效的。实验组的学员对任务活动表现出了乐趣、能力和自主性,他们在完成任务时并不感到紧张和焦虑。皮尔逊-r-相关性用于建立变量之间的关系。实验组的感知选择、压力/紧张和学生成绩呈低正相关,而感知选择、兴趣/愉悦和成绩的相关性微乎其微。这种方法在生物教学中非常值得称赞。通过阐明主动学习在提高学生概念理解能力方面的有效性,本研究通过主动学习的有效性弥补了遗传学理论与实践之间的差距。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Theoretical frameworks of self-efficacy in collaborative science learning practices: A systematic literature review Unveiling the cognitive scaffold: Metacognitive correlates of academic resilience in biology learners The popular scientific book-based coastal gastropod’s diversity as local potential: Practicality and effectiveness on student’s critical thinking ability Implementing ARVi media to enhance students high order cognitive skills Feasibility of submaterial module for reproductive system disorders based on inventory of medical plants
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1