The popular scientific book-based coastal gastropod’s diversity as local potential: Practicality and effectiveness on student’s critical thinking ability

H. Fajeriadi, Muhammad Zaini, D. Dharmono, Bimo Aji Nugroho, F. Fahmi, Antung Fitriani
{"title":"The popular scientific book-based coastal gastropod’s diversity as local potential: Practicality and effectiveness on student’s critical thinking ability","authors":"H. Fajeriadi, Muhammad Zaini, D. Dharmono, Bimo Aji Nugroho, F. Fahmi, Antung Fitriani","doi":"10.22219/jpbi.v10i2.32255","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Developing learning tools based on local potential is necessary because it directly relates to students' daily lives. One of them is a Popular Science Book (PSB), which highlights the potential of gastropods in coastal areas as a subject for observing biodiversity. The implementation of assessments and the value of students' critical thinking abilities still need to be improved. This research aimed to implement the PSB based on its practicality and effectiveness in improving students' critical thinking abilities. The research method used formative evaluation, focused on testing the practicality and efficacy of valid development products. Practicality was analysed based on student response tests through the percentage of responses and the implementation of the learning plan (LP) through categorization. Furthermore, effectiveness was analysed based on student learning outcomes through the percentage of completeness and achievement of critical thinking ability indicators through the N-gain test. The research results prove that the PSB developed was practical and effective. Apperception and interpretation were two of the three stages of implementation of the LP that received the highest average, where students could provide theoretical ideas based on appreciation of environmental issues. This was also supported by the student's critical thinking ability tests, where the interpretation aspect obtained the highest N-gain. The development of local potential-based PSB shows positive impacts, especially ease of use, interest in learning, motivation, apperception, and interpretation. However, it is still necessary to study in more depth the causal factors and solutions for the differences in results between the implementation of the LP at the conclusion stage and the indicators of critical thinking in the inference aspect.","PeriodicalId":512736,"journal":{"name":"JPBI (Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi Indonesia)","volume":"4 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JPBI (Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi Indonesia)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22219/jpbi.v10i2.32255","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Developing learning tools based on local potential is necessary because it directly relates to students' daily lives. One of them is a Popular Science Book (PSB), which highlights the potential of gastropods in coastal areas as a subject for observing biodiversity. The implementation of assessments and the value of students' critical thinking abilities still need to be improved. This research aimed to implement the PSB based on its practicality and effectiveness in improving students' critical thinking abilities. The research method used formative evaluation, focused on testing the practicality and efficacy of valid development products. Practicality was analysed based on student response tests through the percentage of responses and the implementation of the learning plan (LP) through categorization. Furthermore, effectiveness was analysed based on student learning outcomes through the percentage of completeness and achievement of critical thinking ability indicators through the N-gain test. The research results prove that the PSB developed was practical and effective. Apperception and interpretation were two of the three stages of implementation of the LP that received the highest average, where students could provide theoretical ideas based on appreciation of environmental issues. This was also supported by the student's critical thinking ability tests, where the interpretation aspect obtained the highest N-gain. The development of local potential-based PSB shows positive impacts, especially ease of use, interest in learning, motivation, apperception, and interpretation. However, it is still necessary to study in more depth the causal factors and solutions for the differences in results between the implementation of the LP at the conclusion stage and the indicators of critical thinking in the inference aspect.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
以科普读物为基础的沿海腹足类动物多样性作为地方潜力:学生批判性思维能力的实用性和有效性
开发基于当地潜力的学习工具很有必要,因为这与学生的日常生活直接相关。科普读物(PSB)就是其中之一,它强调了沿海地区腹足类动物作为观察生物多样性的学科的潜力。评估的实施和对学生批判性思维能力的重视仍有待提高。本研究旨在根据 PSB 在提高学生批判性思维能力方面的实用性和有效性来实施 PSB。研究方法采用形成性评价,重点测试有效开发产品的实用性和有效性。实用性的分析基于学生的回答测试(通过回答百分比)和学习计划(LP)的实施情况(通过分类)。此外,有效性是根据学生的学习成果,通过完整率和批判性思维能力指标(通过 N-增益测试)来分析的。研究结果证明,所开发的 PSB 既实用又有效。感知和解释是实施学习方案三个阶段中平均分最高的两个阶段,学生可以在理解环境问题的基础上提出理论观点。学生的批判性思维能力测试也证明了这一点,其中阐释方面的 N 增益最高。基于本地潜能的公共广播平台的开发显示出了积极的影响,尤其是在易用性、学习兴趣、动机、感知和解释方面。然而,仍有必要更深入地研究在结论阶段实施低级语言与推理方面的批判性思维指标之间的结果差异的因果因素和解决方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Theoretical frameworks of self-efficacy in collaborative science learning practices: A systematic literature review Unveiling the cognitive scaffold: Metacognitive correlates of academic resilience in biology learners The popular scientific book-based coastal gastropod’s diversity as local potential: Practicality and effectiveness on student’s critical thinking ability Implementing ARVi media to enhance students high order cognitive skills Feasibility of submaterial module for reproductive system disorders based on inventory of medical plants
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1