Dietary patterns and carotenoid intake: Comparisons of MIND, Mediterranean, DASH, and Healthy Eating Index

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q2 NUTRITION & DIETETICS Nutrition Research Pub Date : 2024-03-21 DOI:10.1016/j.nutres.2024.03.008
Tori A. Holthaus , Shelby A. Keye , Shreya Verma , Corinne N. Cannavale , Nicholas A. Burd , Hannah D. Holscher , Naiman A. Khan
{"title":"Dietary patterns and carotenoid intake: Comparisons of MIND, Mediterranean, DASH, and Healthy Eating Index","authors":"Tori A. Holthaus ,&nbsp;Shelby A. Keye ,&nbsp;Shreya Verma ,&nbsp;Corinne N. Cannavale ,&nbsp;Nicholas A. Burd ,&nbsp;Hannah D. Holscher ,&nbsp;Naiman A. Khan","doi":"10.1016/j.nutres.2024.03.008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The Mediterranean-Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension (DASH) Intervention for Neurodegenerative Delay (MIND) dietary pattern is associated with reduced cognitive decline and dementia risk. However, the nutrient features that distinguish the MIND from other patterns are unknown. We investigated the relationship between accordance to the MIND pattern and carotenoid intake (phytonutrients hypothesized to confer neuroprotection) relative to the Mediterranean, DASH, and Healthy Eating Index (HEI-2020). We hypothesized that MIND diet accordance would be a stronger predictor of carotenoid intake relative to other diet indices. A total of 396 adults (aged 19–82 years) completed the Dietary History Questionnaire to assess carotenoid intake and adherence to each diet index. Stepwise regressions with adjustment for covariates followed by the Meng's Z-test were used to compare correlation strength between each diet pattern and carotenoid. All diet patterns were positively associated with lutein and zeaxanthin, β-carotene, α-carotene, and β-cryptoxanthin (all βs ≥0.38, <em>P</em>s &lt;.01). Effect size comparisons revealed that MIND accordance predicted a greater proportion of variance in lutein and zeaxanthin (all <em>Z</em>s ≥ 3.3, <em>P</em>s &lt; .001) and β-carotene (all <em>Z</em>s ≥ 2.6, <em>P</em>s &lt; .01) relative to the Mediterranean, DASH, and HEI-2020. MIND accordance explained a greater proportion of variance in α-carotene (<em>Z</em> = 3.8, <em>P</em> &lt; .001) and β-cryptoxanthin (<em>Z</em> = 3.6, <em>P</em> &lt; .001) relative to the HEI-2020. MIND diet accordance was disproportionately related to carotenoid intake, indicating the MIND index places greater emphasis on carotenoid-rich foods, particularly those containing lutein, zeaxanthin, and β-carotene, relative to other diet indices. Future research is needed to define the role of these carotenoids in nutritional interventions for cognitive health.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":19245,"journal":{"name":"Nutrition Research","volume":"126 ","pages":"Pages 58-66"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nutrition Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0271531724000393","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Mediterranean-Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension (DASH) Intervention for Neurodegenerative Delay (MIND) dietary pattern is associated with reduced cognitive decline and dementia risk. However, the nutrient features that distinguish the MIND from other patterns are unknown. We investigated the relationship between accordance to the MIND pattern and carotenoid intake (phytonutrients hypothesized to confer neuroprotection) relative to the Mediterranean, DASH, and Healthy Eating Index (HEI-2020). We hypothesized that MIND diet accordance would be a stronger predictor of carotenoid intake relative to other diet indices. A total of 396 adults (aged 19–82 years) completed the Dietary History Questionnaire to assess carotenoid intake and adherence to each diet index. Stepwise regressions with adjustment for covariates followed by the Meng's Z-test were used to compare correlation strength between each diet pattern and carotenoid. All diet patterns were positively associated with lutein and zeaxanthin, β-carotene, α-carotene, and β-cryptoxanthin (all βs ≥0.38, Ps <.01). Effect size comparisons revealed that MIND accordance predicted a greater proportion of variance in lutein and zeaxanthin (all Zs ≥ 3.3, Ps < .001) and β-carotene (all Zs ≥ 2.6, Ps < .01) relative to the Mediterranean, DASH, and HEI-2020. MIND accordance explained a greater proportion of variance in α-carotene (Z = 3.8, P < .001) and β-cryptoxanthin (Z = 3.6, P < .001) relative to the HEI-2020. MIND diet accordance was disproportionately related to carotenoid intake, indicating the MIND index places greater emphasis on carotenoid-rich foods, particularly those containing lutein, zeaxanthin, and β-carotene, relative to other diet indices. Future research is needed to define the role of these carotenoids in nutritional interventions for cognitive health.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
膳食模式和类胡萝卜素摄入量:MIND、地中海、DASH 和健康饮食指数的比较
地中海-高血压饮食疗法(DASH)干预神经退行性延迟(MIND)饮食模式与认知能力下降和痴呆症风险降低有关。然而,MIND 与其他饮食模式不同的营养特征尚不清楚。我们研究了相对于地中海、DASH 和健康饮食指数 (HEI-2020) 而言,MIND 饮食模式与类胡萝卜素摄入量(假设可提供神经保护的植物营养素)之间的关系。我们假设,与其他饮食指数相比,MIND 饮食标准对类胡萝卜素摄入量的预测作用更强。共有 396 名成人(19-82 岁)填写了膳食史调查问卷,以评估类胡萝卜素的摄入量和对每种膳食指数的依从性。通过调整协变量的逐步回归和孟氏 Z 检验来比较每种饮食模式与类胡萝卜素之间的相关性。所有饮食模式都与叶黄素和玉米黄质、β-胡萝卜素、α-胡萝卜素和β-隐黄素呈正相关(所有βs≥0.38,Ps <.01)。效应大小比较显示,相对于地中海模式、DASH 模式和 HEI-2020 模式,MIND 模式可预测叶黄素和玉米黄质(所有 Zs 均≥3.3,Ps <.001)和β-胡萝卜素(所有 Zs 均≥2.6,Ps <.01)的更大变异比例。相对于 HEI-2020,MIND 饮食法对 α-胡萝卜素(Z = 3.8,P < .001)和 β-隐黄素(Z = 3.6,P < .001)方差的解释比例更大。MIND膳食标准与类胡萝卜素的摄入量不成比例,这表明与其他膳食指数相比,MIND指数更重视富含类胡萝卜素的食物,尤其是含有叶黄素、玉米黄质和β-胡萝卜素的食物。未来的研究需要明确这些类胡萝卜素在认知健康营养干预中的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Nutrition Research
Nutrition Research 医学-营养学
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
2.20%
发文量
107
审稿时长
58 days
期刊介绍: Nutrition Research publishes original research articles, communications, and reviews on basic and applied nutrition. The mission of Nutrition Research is to serve as the journal for global communication of nutrition and life sciences research on diet and health. The field of nutrition sciences includes, but is not limited to, the study of nutrients during growth, reproduction, aging, health, and disease. Articles covering basic and applied research on all aspects of nutrition sciences are encouraged, including: nutritional biochemistry and metabolism; metabolomics, nutrient gene interactions; nutrient requirements for health; nutrition and disease; digestion and absorption; nutritional anthropology; epidemiology; the influence of socioeconomic and cultural factors on nutrition of the individual and the community; the impact of nutrient intake on disease response and behavior; the consequences of nutritional deficiency on growth and development, endocrine and nervous systems, and immunity; nutrition and gut microbiota; food intolerance and allergy; nutrient drug interactions; nutrition and aging; nutrition and cancer; obesity; diabetes; and intervention programs.
期刊最新文献
Editorial office and Board Members David Kritchevsky Graduate Student Award for Nutrition Research Absorption, anti-inflammatory, antioxidant, and cardioprotective impacts of a novel fasting mimetic containing spermidine, nicotinamide, palmitoylethanolamide, and oleoylethanolamide: A pilot dose-escalation study in healthy young adult men Healthful plant-based diets are negatively associated with the rate of biological aging: A national study based on US adults Dietary Inflammatory Index is associated with periodontitis risk in pregnant women with gestational diabetes mellitus
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1