Techno-aesthetics in architectural discourses: A state of the art review

IF 3.1 1区 艺术学 0 ARCHITECTURE Frontiers of Architectural Research Pub Date : 2024-03-21 DOI:10.1016/j.foar.2024.01.005
Bita Vasseghipanah, Saeed Haghir
{"title":"Techno-aesthetics in architectural discourses: A state of the art review","authors":"Bita Vasseghipanah,&nbsp;Saeed Haghir","doi":"10.1016/j.foar.2024.01.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Since the beginning of the First Industrial Revolution, technology and its impact on art and design have been a topic of discussion. With the rise of digital technologies, there has been a renewed interest in exploring the relationship between technology and aesthetics. The aim of this paper is to clarify the concept of techno-aesthetics and make it a more accessible field of study by identifying its key discourses. In order to understand how technological objects have been evaluated in architectural history, a systematic review of 177 studies was conducted. The collected literature was analyzed using Kant's characteristics of aesthetic judgment, discourse analysis techniques from Foucault's methodology and <em>Laclau and Mouffe's discourse theory</em>. This helped in creating a framework for classifying the literature. The study analyzed results based on five categories: admired technological objects and architectural objects inspired by them, concepts (function, truth, freedom, objectivity, unity, and power), standpoints (rationalism, romanticism, optimism, and determinism), and benchmarks of legitimation (ideology, history, scientific nature, everyday aesthetics, and sublimation of technology). These results were then combined to identify eleven significant discourses of techno-aesthetics.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":51662,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers of Architectural Research","volume":"13 3","pages":"Pages 505-542"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2095263524000190/pdfft?md5=f8a6356254e0a97accaa2e1f27f05b30&pid=1-s2.0-S2095263524000190-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers of Architectural Research","FirstCategoryId":"1087","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2095263524000190","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"艺术学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ARCHITECTURE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Since the beginning of the First Industrial Revolution, technology and its impact on art and design have been a topic of discussion. With the rise of digital technologies, there has been a renewed interest in exploring the relationship between technology and aesthetics. The aim of this paper is to clarify the concept of techno-aesthetics and make it a more accessible field of study by identifying its key discourses. In order to understand how technological objects have been evaluated in architectural history, a systematic review of 177 studies was conducted. The collected literature was analyzed using Kant's characteristics of aesthetic judgment, discourse analysis techniques from Foucault's methodology and Laclau and Mouffe's discourse theory. This helped in creating a framework for classifying the literature. The study analyzed results based on five categories: admired technological objects and architectural objects inspired by them, concepts (function, truth, freedom, objectivity, unity, and power), standpoints (rationalism, romanticism, optimism, and determinism), and benchmarks of legitimation (ideology, history, scientific nature, everyday aesthetics, and sublimation of technology). These results were then combined to identify eleven significant discourses of techno-aesthetics.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
建筑论述中的技术美学:现状综述
自第一次工业革命开始以来,技术及其对艺术和设计的影响一直是人们讨论的话题。随着数字技术的兴起,人们对探索技术与美学之间的关系重新产生了兴趣。本文旨在澄清技术美学的概念,并通过确定其主要论述,使其成为一个更容易理解的研究领域。为了了解建筑史中是如何评价技术对象的,我们对 177 项研究进行了系统回顾。我们使用康德的审美判断特征、福柯方法论中的话语分析技术以及拉克劳和莫夫的话语理论对收集到的文献进行了分析。这有助于建立文献分类框架。研究根据五个类别对结果进行了分析:所欣赏的技术对象和受其启发的建筑对象、概念(功能、真理、自由、客观性、统一性和权力)、立场(理性主义、浪漫主义、乐观主义和决定论)和合法性基准(意识形态、历史、科学性、日常美学和技术升华)。然后将这些结果综合起来,确定了十一种重要的技术美学论述。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
2.90%
发文量
430
审稿时长
30 weeks
期刊介绍: Frontiers of Architectural Research is an international journal that publishes original research papers, review articles, and case studies to promote rapid communication and exchange among scholars, architects, and engineers. This journal introduces and reviews significant and pioneering achievements in the field of architecture research. Subject areas include the primary branches of architecture, such as architectural design and theory, architectural science and technology, urban planning, landscaping architecture, existing building renovation, and architectural heritage conservation. The journal encourages studies based on a rigorous scientific approach and state-of-the-art technology. All published papers reflect original research works and basic theories, models, computing, and design in architecture. High-quality papers addressing the social aspects of architecture are also welcome. This journal is strictly peer-reviewed and accepts only original manuscripts submitted in English.
期刊最新文献
Editorial How urban environments affect public sentiment and physical activity using a cognitive computing framework “Interface-element-perception” model to evaluation of urban sidewalk visual landscape in the core area of Beijing Visitors' consistent stay behavior patterns within free-roaming scenic architectural complexes: Considering impacts of temporal, spatial, and environmental factors A study of the inhibitory effect and mechanism of airflow regarding mould on building surfaces
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1