Egyptian Popular Culture in Late Ottoman and Mandate Palestine

J. Beinin
{"title":"Egyptian Popular Culture in Late Ottoman and Mandate Palestine","authors":"J. Beinin","doi":"10.5325/pir.1.1.0005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n During the late Ottoman and British Mandate periods, Palestine was an integral component of the audience for the new forms of “colloquial mass culture” that emerged in Cairo. Early Egyptian recording artists, theatre troupes, and the giants of interwar Egyptian popular music—Umm Kulthum and Muhammad Abdel Wahhab—regularly appeared and were warmly received in Palestine. Egyptian performers did not come to Palestine to affirm or reinforce its Arabism. They came because they earned substantial fees for their performances and because they had large and loyal audiences there, some of whom were Jews. The presence of both Arabs and Jews at concerts or in movie theaters did not necessarily mean that they liked each other. Neither did they dislike each other as a matter of principle. This ambiguous legacy was manifested in the political uproar over the naming of streets in honor of Umm Kulthum and Abdel Wahhab in Jerusalem, Ramle, and Haifa in 2020. This was not an indicator of Arab–Jewish coexistence, and it did not represent a conciliation with terrorism. It was a phenomenon in which spectators and fans (and detractors) read themselves into the meanings of the work of artists.","PeriodicalId":516695,"journal":{"name":"Palestine/Israel Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Palestine/Israel Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5325/pir.1.1.0005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

During the late Ottoman and British Mandate periods, Palestine was an integral component of the audience for the new forms of “colloquial mass culture” that emerged in Cairo. Early Egyptian recording artists, theatre troupes, and the giants of interwar Egyptian popular music—Umm Kulthum and Muhammad Abdel Wahhab—regularly appeared and were warmly received in Palestine. Egyptian performers did not come to Palestine to affirm or reinforce its Arabism. They came because they earned substantial fees for their performances and because they had large and loyal audiences there, some of whom were Jews. The presence of both Arabs and Jews at concerts or in movie theaters did not necessarily mean that they liked each other. Neither did they dislike each other as a matter of principle. This ambiguous legacy was manifested in the political uproar over the naming of streets in honor of Umm Kulthum and Abdel Wahhab in Jerusalem, Ramle, and Haifa in 2020. This was not an indicator of Arab–Jewish coexistence, and it did not represent a conciliation with terrorism. It was a phenomenon in which spectators and fans (and detractors) read themselves into the meanings of the work of artists.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
奥斯曼帝国后期和委任统治时期巴勒斯坦的埃及大众文化
在奥斯曼帝国末期和英国委任统治时期,巴勒斯坦是开罗出现的新形式 "大众口语文化 "受众的一个组成部分。早期的埃及录音艺术家、剧团和战时埃及流行音乐巨匠--库尔图姆和穆罕默德-阿卜杜勒-瓦哈卜--经常出现在巴勒斯坦并受到热烈欢迎。埃及表演者来到巴勒斯坦并不是为了肯定或加强巴勒斯坦的阿拉伯主义。他们来是因为他们的演出赚取了可观的酬金,而且他们在那里拥有大量忠实的观众,其中一些是犹太人。阿拉伯人和犹太人同时出现在音乐会或电影院并不一定意味着他们喜欢对方。从原则上讲,他们也不讨厌对方。2020 年,耶路撒冷、拉姆勒和海法为纪念乌姆-库尔图姆和阿卜杜勒-瓦哈卜而命名的街道引起了政治骚动,这就体现了这种模棱两可的遗产。这不是阿拉伯人与犹太人共存的标志,也不代表与恐怖主义和解。这是一种现象,观众和粉丝(以及诋毁者)从艺术家作品的含义中解读自己。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Settler Mimicry: Colonization and Decolonization through Imitation Walking to Unsettle Jerusalem Old and New Strategies for Exploiting Structural Change in Palestine/Israel: A Review Essay Circumventing Israeli Control: Palestinian Furniture Exports via Israeli Settlements Is the Israeli Discipline of “Middle East and Islam Studies” Decolonizing?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1