Penile burn reconstruction after self-mutilation using electrothermal device-a case report

Alica Hokynková , Petr Šín , Gabriela Michalčáková , Aleš Čermák , Andrea Pokorná
{"title":"Penile burn reconstruction after self-mutilation using electrothermal device-a case report","authors":"Alica Hokynková ,&nbsp;Petr Šín ,&nbsp;Gabriela Michalčáková ,&nbsp;Aleš Čermák ,&nbsp;Andrea Pokorná","doi":"10.1016/j.burnso.2024.03.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Isolated genital burns are not frequent injuries; more often, they are part of larger surface-area burn injuries. Aetiology and mechanisms of genital burn injuries differ regarding country, age and patients’ socioeconomic status.</p></div><div><h3>Aim</h3><p>The aim is to describe a rare case report of a 69-year-old man who incurred a deep penile burn after using an electrothermal sexual device.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>The patient was admitted to the Department of Urology (blinded for review) with deep penile burn a week after the injury<em>.</em> Debridement, conservative therapy, and deferred reconstruction due to extensive lymphoedema were performed<em>.</em> Due to numerous small, contracted skin scars of penile corpus arising from multiple healed burns caused by self-mutilation by repeatedly using an electrothermal sexual device, the penile defect reconstruction was performed. A local ventral foreskin skin flap in combination with a full split-thickness graft was done in order to avoid extensive scar contracture with possible penile deviation.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>There were no complications in postoperative care in the follow-up period of 26 months, with satisfactory aesthetical and functional results<em>.</em></p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>In the case of penile wounds, the reconstruction technique depends on the injury's size, depth and localisation of the damage.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":72486,"journal":{"name":"Burns open : an international open access journal for burn injuries","volume":"8 2","pages":"Pages 143-146"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S246891222400021X/pdfft?md5=906ff7f29a11bbf59663d65326f3a7b9&pid=1-s2.0-S246891222400021X-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Burns open : an international open access journal for burn injuries","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S246891222400021X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Isolated genital burns are not frequent injuries; more often, they are part of larger surface-area burn injuries. Aetiology and mechanisms of genital burn injuries differ regarding country, age and patients’ socioeconomic status.

Aim

The aim is to describe a rare case report of a 69-year-old man who incurred a deep penile burn after using an electrothermal sexual device.

Methods

The patient was admitted to the Department of Urology (blinded for review) with deep penile burn a week after the injury. Debridement, conservative therapy, and deferred reconstruction due to extensive lymphoedema were performed. Due to numerous small, contracted skin scars of penile corpus arising from multiple healed burns caused by self-mutilation by repeatedly using an electrothermal sexual device, the penile defect reconstruction was performed. A local ventral foreskin skin flap in combination with a full split-thickness graft was done in order to avoid extensive scar contracture with possible penile deviation.

Results

There were no complications in postoperative care in the follow-up period of 26 months, with satisfactory aesthetical and functional results.

Conclusion

In the case of penile wounds, the reconstruction technique depends on the injury's size, depth and localisation of the damage.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用电热装置自残后的阴茎烧伤重建--病例报告
导言孤立的生殖器烧伤并不常见,更多时候是较大面积烧伤的一部分。生殖器烧伤的病因和机制因国家、年龄和患者的社会经济地位而异。目的:本报告描述了一例罕见的病例,一名 69 岁的男性在使用电热性装置后导致阴茎深度烧伤。对患者进行了清创、保守治疗,并因广泛淋巴水肿而推迟了重建手术。由于反复使用电热性器械进行自残,阴茎海绵体多处烧伤愈合后产生了许多小的挛缩性皮肤疤痕,因此进行了阴茎缺损重建。结果在 26 个月的随访期间,术后护理未出现并发症,美观和功能效果令人满意。结论对于阴茎伤口,重建技术取决于损伤的大小、深度和损伤的局部。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊最新文献
Successful recovery of 85% TBSA burns in a resource-limited Nigerian hospital without a burns ward or intensive care unit: A case report Third-degree nasal tip burn in a preterm infant treated with amniotic membrane (Case report) A novel non-invasive treatment in deep burned patients who do not have consent to surgery How can mathematics be used to improve burn care? Benefits of the use of porcine skin for the management of toxic epidermal necrolysis injuries: Review of the literature
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1