Structural bone grafting for glenoid bone loss in primary anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty: a case series and technique report

{"title":"Structural bone grafting for glenoid bone loss in primary anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty: a case series and technique report","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.xrrt.2024.02.010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Posterior glenoid bone loss in glenohumeral osteoarthritis poses significant challenges in shoulder arthroplasty. Anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) with a humeral head autograft to address the glenoid bone deficiency is an option for these difficult cases. Variable results with this procedure are reported in the literature. This article describes the surgical technique of posterior glenoid bone grafting in TSA using a glenoid implant with hybrid fixation and a series of reported patient functional and radiographic outcomes.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A retrospective chart review of cases from 2015 to 2020 by a single surgeon revealed 10 patients who underwent primary TSA with hybrid glenoid component and posterior glenoid bone grafting. Preoperative and postoperative radiographs were assessed for glenoid inclination, glenoid version, acromiohumeral distance, humeral stem status, and glenoid implant status. Functional outcomes were evaluated by range of motion, strength, and patient-reported clinical outcomes (pain and function on a visual analog scale, Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand score, Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score). Complications and reoperations were also evaluated.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Average follow-up was 31.4 months, active forward flexion and external rotation improved on average from 105<sup>°</sup> to 150<sup>°</sup> and 20<sup>°</sup> to 60<sup>°</sup>, respectively (<em>P</em> &lt; .001) and average abduction improved from 100<sup>°</sup> to 140<sup>°</sup> (<em>P</em> &lt; .002). At an average of 26.7 months, patients reported assessments (visual analog scale pain and function, Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand score, Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons scores) reveal significant (<em>P</em> &lt; .05) improvement in pain and functional outcomes. Radiographically, at 23.0 ± 20.1 months, all patients demonstrated a well-fixed humeral and glenoid component without evidence of lucent lines. The bone graft used in each patient was well unionized and no radiographic complications were reported. No patients underwent revision surgery, and there was one clinical complication reported, which consisted of a suspected rotator cuff injury at follow-up.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Hybrid fixation with structural glenoid bone grafting in TSA resulted in excellent outcomes with no evidence of graft or component failure on follow-up radiographs and significantly reduced pain, improved functional scores, and improved active range of motion.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":74030,"journal":{"name":"JSES reviews, reports, and techniques","volume":"4 3","pages":"Pages 464-471"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666639124000397/pdfft?md5=18b925b544b7c22067b538b97492b60e&pid=1-s2.0-S2666639124000397-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JSES reviews, reports, and techniques","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666639124000397","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Posterior glenoid bone loss in glenohumeral osteoarthritis poses significant challenges in shoulder arthroplasty. Anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) with a humeral head autograft to address the glenoid bone deficiency is an option for these difficult cases. Variable results with this procedure are reported in the literature. This article describes the surgical technique of posterior glenoid bone grafting in TSA using a glenoid implant with hybrid fixation and a series of reported patient functional and radiographic outcomes.

Methods

A retrospective chart review of cases from 2015 to 2020 by a single surgeon revealed 10 patients who underwent primary TSA with hybrid glenoid component and posterior glenoid bone grafting. Preoperative and postoperative radiographs were assessed for glenoid inclination, glenoid version, acromiohumeral distance, humeral stem status, and glenoid implant status. Functional outcomes were evaluated by range of motion, strength, and patient-reported clinical outcomes (pain and function on a visual analog scale, Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand score, Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score). Complications and reoperations were also evaluated.

Results

Average follow-up was 31.4 months, active forward flexion and external rotation improved on average from 105° to 150° and 20° to 60°, respectively (P < .001) and average abduction improved from 100° to 140° (P < .002). At an average of 26.7 months, patients reported assessments (visual analog scale pain and function, Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand score, Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons scores) reveal significant (P < .05) improvement in pain and functional outcomes. Radiographically, at 23.0 ± 20.1 months, all patients demonstrated a well-fixed humeral and glenoid component without evidence of lucent lines. The bone graft used in each patient was well unionized and no radiographic complications were reported. No patients underwent revision surgery, and there was one clinical complication reported, which consisted of a suspected rotator cuff injury at follow-up.

Conclusion

Hybrid fixation with structural glenoid bone grafting in TSA resulted in excellent outcomes with no evidence of graft or component failure on follow-up radiographs and significantly reduced pain, improved functional scores, and improved active range of motion.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
结构性骨移植治疗原发性解剖全肩关节成形术中的盂骨缺损:病例系列和技术报告
背景肱骨骨关节炎导致的盂骨缺损给肩关节成形术带来了巨大挑战。采用肱骨头自体移植的解剖全肩关节置换术(TSA)可解决盂骨缺损问题,是这类疑难病例的一种选择。文献报道这种手术的效果不一。本文介绍了在TSA中使用混合固定的盂成形体进行盂后植骨的手术技巧,以及一系列患者功能和影像学结果的报告。方法对一位外科医生在2015年至2020年期间的病例进行回顾性病历审查,结果显示有10名患者接受了使用混合盂成形组件和盂后植骨的初级TSA手术。对术前和术后X光片进行了评估,包括盂体倾斜度、盂体版本、肩肱距离、肱骨柄状态和盂体植入状态。功能结果通过活动范围、力量和患者报告的临床结果(疼痛和功能视觉模拟量表、手臂、肩部和手部残疾评分、单一评估数字评价、美国肩肘外科医生评分)进行评估。结果 平均随访31.4个月,主动前屈和外旋的平均改善幅度分别从105°增加到150°和20°增加到60°(P< .001),外展的平均改善幅度从100°增加到140°(P< .002)。平均 26.7 个月时,患者报告的评估结果(视觉模拟量表疼痛和功能、手臂、肩部和手部残疾评分、单次评估数字评价、美国肩肘外科医生评分)显示疼痛和功能结果有了显著改善(P <.05)。在 23.0 ± 20.1 个月的影像学检查中,所有患者的肱骨和盂状关节都固定良好,没有明显的透明线。每位患者使用的植骨均结合良好,未出现放射学并发症。没有患者接受翻修手术,有一起临床并发症的报告,包括随访时疑似肩袖损伤。结论混合固定与结构性盂骨移植在TSA中的应用取得了极佳的效果,随访X光片未发现移植或组件失败的迹象,疼痛明显减轻,功能评分提高,主动活动范围改善。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊最新文献
Acute compartment syndrome following biceps tendon rupture: a case report. A spontaneously resolved varix in the spinoglenoid notch: a case report. Medialization of shaft of humerus to provide medial buttress and prevent varus collapse in 3- and 4-part proximal humerus fractures: review of the surgical technique. Median nerve entrapment neuropathy: a review on the pronator syndrome. Coracoid osteotomy approach for open free bone grafting of anterior glenoid defects.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1