A Community-Based Participatory Approach in Applying the Sociocultural Resilience Model in U.S–Mexico Border Communities

M. Ingram, Ada M. Wilkinson-Lee, Namoonga M. Mantina, M. Velasco, Gloria D Coronado, Mark Gallegos, S. Carvajal
{"title":"A Community-Based Participatory Approach in Applying the Sociocultural Resilience Model in U.S–Mexico Border Communities","authors":"M. Ingram, Ada M. Wilkinson-Lee, Namoonga M. Mantina, M. Velasco, Gloria D Coronado, Mark Gallegos, S. Carvajal","doi":"10.1353/cpr.2024.a922337","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract: Background: Behavioral models play a key role in identifying pathways to better health and provide a foundation for health promotion interventions. However, behavioral models based in epidemiological research may be limited in relevance and utility in practice. Objectives: We describe a participatory approach within a community-based participatory research partnership for integrating epidemiological and community perspectives into the application of the sociocultural resilience model (SRM). The SRM posits that cultural processes have a symbiotic relationship with health-promoting social processes, which contribute to the health advantages among Mexicanorigin and other Latinx populations. Methods: Community action board members engaged with academic partners to interpret and apply the SRM to a community-clinical linkages intervention implemented in the context of three U.S.–Mexico border communities. In a two-day workshop, partners engaged in a series of iterative discussions to reach common definitions and measures for SRM constructs. Results: Partners described daily cultural processes as the food they eat, how they communicate, and a collectivist approach to getting things done. For intervention activities, the partners opted for intergenerational storytelling, sharing of food, and artistic forms of expression. Partners included measures of cultural nuances such as border identity and the complexities that often arise from navigating bicultural norms. Conclusions: Collaborative approaches within community-based participatory research partnerships can facilitate the adaptation and measurement of conceptual health behavior models in community practice.","PeriodicalId":503736,"journal":{"name":"Progress in Community Health Partnerships: Research, Education, and Action","volume":"169 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Progress in Community Health Partnerships: Research, Education, and Action","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/cpr.2024.a922337","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract: Background: Behavioral models play a key role in identifying pathways to better health and provide a foundation for health promotion interventions. However, behavioral models based in epidemiological research may be limited in relevance and utility in practice. Objectives: We describe a participatory approach within a community-based participatory research partnership for integrating epidemiological and community perspectives into the application of the sociocultural resilience model (SRM). The SRM posits that cultural processes have a symbiotic relationship with health-promoting social processes, which contribute to the health advantages among Mexicanorigin and other Latinx populations. Methods: Community action board members engaged with academic partners to interpret and apply the SRM to a community-clinical linkages intervention implemented in the context of three U.S.–Mexico border communities. In a two-day workshop, partners engaged in a series of iterative discussions to reach common definitions and measures for SRM constructs. Results: Partners described daily cultural processes as the food they eat, how they communicate, and a collectivist approach to getting things done. For intervention activities, the partners opted for intergenerational storytelling, sharing of food, and artistic forms of expression. Partners included measures of cultural nuances such as border identity and the complexities that often arise from navigating bicultural norms. Conclusions: Collaborative approaches within community-based participatory research partnerships can facilitate the adaptation and measurement of conceptual health behavior models in community practice.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在美墨边境社区应用社会文化复原力模型的社区参与式方法
摘要:背景:行为模型在确定改善健康的途径方面发挥着关键作用,并为促进健康的干预措施奠定了基础。然而,基于流行病学研究的行为模型在实际应用中的相关性和实用性可能有限。目标:我们介绍了一种基于社区的参与式研究合作中的参与式方法,该方法将流行病学和社区视角整合到社会文化复原力模型(SRM)的应用中。社会文化复原力模型认为,文化过程与促进健康的社会过程之间存在共生关系,这有助于提高墨西哥裔和其他拉丁裔人口的健康水平。研究方法社区行动委员会成员与学术伙伴合作,在三个美国-墨西哥边境社区的背景下,对社区-临床联系干预措施进行解释和应用。在为期两天的研讨会上,合作伙伴进行了一系列反复讨论,以就 SRM 结构达成共同的定义和衡量标准。结果:合作伙伴将日常文化过程描述为他们吃的食物、他们的交流方式以及完成工作的集体主义方法。在干预活动方面,合作伙伴选择了代际讲故事、分享食物和艺术表现形式。合作伙伴还对文化的细微差别采取了措施,如边界身份和在双文化规范中航行时经常出现的复杂性。结论以社区为基础的参与式研究伙伴关系中的合作方法可以促进在社区实践中对概念性健康行为模型进行调整和测量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Lessons from Two Latino Communities Working with Academic Partners to Increase Access to COVID-19 Testing A Model of Community Health Worker Integration into Schools: Community-based Participatory Research in Action Community Health Workers Deliver Mental Health Intervention to Uninsured Latinx in Baltimore: Evaluation and Lessons Learned in a Pilot Program A Community-Based Participatory Approach in Applying the Sociocultural Resilience Model in U.S–Mexico Border Communities Evaluating the Impact and Effectiveness of Flint's Community Ethics Review Board (CBOP-CERB): A Pilot Study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1