Willingness-to-pay for early childhood development: A field experiment in Western China

IF 5.2 1区 经济学 Q1 ECONOMICS 中国经济评论 Pub Date : 2024-03-10 DOI:10.1016/j.chieco.2024.102146
Lei Wang , Chuyu Song , Yue Xian , Sean Sylvia , Scott Rozelle
{"title":"Willingness-to-pay for early childhood development: A field experiment in Western China","authors":"Lei Wang ,&nbsp;Chuyu Song ,&nbsp;Yue Xian ,&nbsp;Sean Sylvia ,&nbsp;Scott Rozelle","doi":"10.1016/j.chieco.2024.102146","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Given the size of the problem and the scientific evidence that timely intervention can improve long-term outcomes, an important question is how to best scale-up early childhood development (ECD) interventions in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). A key component of the solution is financing. However, there has been little research on the question of whether cost-sharing models can equitably and sustainably finance ECD programs at scale in LMICs. We built parenting centers in two rural communities of Western China to teach caregivers how to stimulate child development through fun and interactive activities. We used the Becker-Degroot-Marschak (BDM) mechanism to elicit the household willingness-to-pay (WTP) for a one-month pass to the parenting centers. The results of the BDM suggest that a cost-sharing model would not be suitable for China's rural population at least in the short-run. Demand was found to be highly elastic. In addition, we found limited evidence of selection effects. We also found no evidence of sunk-cost effects.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48285,"journal":{"name":"中国经济评论","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"中国经济评论","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1043951X2400035X","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Given the size of the problem and the scientific evidence that timely intervention can improve long-term outcomes, an important question is how to best scale-up early childhood development (ECD) interventions in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). A key component of the solution is financing. However, there has been little research on the question of whether cost-sharing models can equitably and sustainably finance ECD programs at scale in LMICs. We built parenting centers in two rural communities of Western China to teach caregivers how to stimulate child development through fun and interactive activities. We used the Becker-Degroot-Marschak (BDM) mechanism to elicit the household willingness-to-pay (WTP) for a one-month pass to the parenting centers. The results of the BDM suggest that a cost-sharing model would not be suitable for China's rural population at least in the short-run. Demand was found to be highly elastic. In addition, we found limited evidence of selection effects. We also found no evidence of sunk-cost effects.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
儿童早期发展的支付意愿:中国西部的实地实验
鉴于问题的严重性以及及时干预可改善长期结果的科学证据,一个重要的问题是如何在低收入和中等收入国家(LMICs)最有效地扩大幼儿发展(ECD)干预的规模。解决方案的一个关键组成部分是筹资。然而,对于成本分担模式能否公平、可持续地为中低收入国家的幼儿发展项目提供大规模资金这一问题,目前还鲜有研究。我们在中国西部的两个农村社区建立了育儿中心,教保育员如何通过有趣的互动活动促进儿童发展。我们使用贝克尔-德格鲁特-马沙克(BDM)机制来了解家庭对亲子中心为期一个月的通行证的支付意愿(WTP)。BDM 的结果表明,费用分摊模式至少在短期内不适合中国农村人口。我们发现需求弹性很大。此外,我们还发现了选择效应的有限证据。我们也没有发现太阳成本效应的证据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
中国经济评论
中国经济评论 ECONOMICS-
CiteScore
10.60
自引率
4.40%
发文量
380
期刊介绍: The China Economic Review publishes original works of scholarship which add to the knowledge of the economy of China and to economies as a discipline. We seek, in particular, papers dealing with policy, performance and institutional change. Empirical papers normally use a formal model, a data set, and standard statistical techniques. Submissions are subjected to double-blind peer review.
期刊最新文献
Has R&D contributed to productivity growth in China? The role of basic, applied and experimental R&D Impacts of CEO-employee pay disparity on investor behavior and market dynamics: Evidence from laboratory asset markets Editorial Board Does survey mode matter? An experimental evaluation of data quality in China Lights dim, exports down: Examining the trade effects of power shortages on Chinese manufacturing firms
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1