Uncovering physical harm in cases of reported child maltreatment

Nico Trocmé , Barbara Fallon , Nicolette Joh-Carnella , Kristin Denault
{"title":"Uncovering physical harm in cases of reported child maltreatment","authors":"Nico Trocmé ,&nbsp;Barbara Fallon ,&nbsp;Nicolette Joh-Carnella ,&nbsp;Kristin Denault","doi":"10.1016/j.chipro.2024.100014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Child protection statutes are designed to protect children from harm, yet there is surprisingly limited information available about injuries or other forms of harm documented in cases of reported child maltreatment.</p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To examine trends in the rate of substantiated child maltreatment investigations in Canada involving physical harm over a twenty-year period.</p></div><div><h3>Participants and Setting</h3><p>The Canadian Incidence Study of Reported Child Abuse and Neglect (CIS) is a cyclical study which uses a file review methodology to collect information about child maltreatment-related investigations from child protection workers across Canada.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We conducted secondary analysis of data from three cycles of the CIS (1998, 2008, and 2019). Because information on physical harm was not available from Quebec during the 2019 cycle, we limited the analyses to the rest of Canada, excluding Quebec.</p></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><p>The rate of child maltreatment-related investigations has more than doubled between 1998 and 2019 from 24.53 to 56.03 investigations per 1000 children. Rates of substantiated maltreatment have also increased (from 10.21 to 17.56 investigations per 1000 children), while the rate of substantiated investigations involving documented physical harm has decreased (from 1.81 to 0.79 investigations per 1000 children).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Child protection agencies in Canada are identifying less physical harm than they were two decades ago although the overall rate of investigations has increased in the same time period. A better understanding of the scope of injuries and the profile of children and families investigated is essential to understanding the extent to which child protection systems are effectively meeting their duty to protect.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100237,"journal":{"name":"Child Protection and Practice","volume":"1 ","pages":"Article 100014"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2950193824000147/pdfft?md5=10daf27527f6754fa9d1e21848122cc9&pid=1-s2.0-S2950193824000147-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Child Protection and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2950193824000147","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Child protection statutes are designed to protect children from harm, yet there is surprisingly limited information available about injuries or other forms of harm documented in cases of reported child maltreatment.

Objective

To examine trends in the rate of substantiated child maltreatment investigations in Canada involving physical harm over a twenty-year period.

Participants and Setting

The Canadian Incidence Study of Reported Child Abuse and Neglect (CIS) is a cyclical study which uses a file review methodology to collect information about child maltreatment-related investigations from child protection workers across Canada.

Methods

We conducted secondary analysis of data from three cycles of the CIS (1998, 2008, and 2019). Because information on physical harm was not available from Quebec during the 2019 cycle, we limited the analyses to the rest of Canada, excluding Quebec.

Findings

The rate of child maltreatment-related investigations has more than doubled between 1998 and 2019 from 24.53 to 56.03 investigations per 1000 children. Rates of substantiated maltreatment have also increased (from 10.21 to 17.56 investigations per 1000 children), while the rate of substantiated investigations involving documented physical harm has decreased (from 1.81 to 0.79 investigations per 1000 children).

Conclusion

Child protection agencies in Canada are identifying less physical harm than they were two decades ago although the overall rate of investigations has increased in the same time period. A better understanding of the scope of injuries and the profile of children and families investigated is essential to understanding the extent to which child protection systems are effectively meeting their duty to protect.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在报告的虐待儿童案件中发现身体伤害
背景儿童保护法规的目的是保护儿童免受伤害,然而在报告的虐待儿童案件中,有关伤害或其他形式伤害的记录信息却少得令人吃惊。参与者和研究背景加拿大儿童虐待和忽视报告发生率研究(CIS)是一项周期性研究,它采用档案审查方法从加拿大各地的儿童保护工作者那里收集与儿童虐待相关的调查信息。方法我们对CIS三个周期(1998年、2008年和2019年)的数据进行了二次分析。由于魁北克省在 2019 年的周期内无法提供有关身体伤害的信息,因此我们将分析范围限制在加拿大其他地区,不包括魁北克省。经证实的虐待率也有所上升(从每 1000 名儿童中 10.21 起调查上升到 17.56 起),而涉及有记录的身体伤害的经证实的调查率有所下降(从每 1000 名儿童中 1.81 起调查下降到 0.79 起)。要了解儿童保护系统在多大程度上有效履行了其保护职责,就必须更好地了解所调查的伤害范围以及儿童和家庭的概况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Population attributable fractions of adolescent health and well-being outcomes associated with adverse childhood experiences in a provincially representative sample in Ontario, Canada Systematic review: Impact of juvenile incarceration Bidirectional associations between well-being at school, psychosocial problems and PTSS in children exposed to family violence Attitudes towards parents with a diagnosis of borderline personality disorder in child protection settings Silent group sandplay activates healing
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1