Safety analysis of evaluation and acceptance processes for space systems and operations based on system-theoretic approach

IF 1 Q3 ENGINEERING, AEROSPACE Journal of Space Safety Engineering Pub Date : 2024-06-01 DOI:10.1016/j.jsse.2024.03.002
Antonio V.D. Merladet , Carlos H.N. Lahoz , Chiara Manfletti , Rodrigo M. Silveira , Diogo S. Castilho , Karen S. Andrade
{"title":"Safety analysis of evaluation and acceptance processes for space systems and operations based on system-theoretic approach","authors":"Antonio V.D. Merladet ,&nbsp;Carlos H.N. Lahoz ,&nbsp;Chiara Manfletti ,&nbsp;Rodrigo M. Silveira ,&nbsp;Diogo S. Castilho ,&nbsp;Karen S. Andrade","doi":"10.1016/j.jsse.2024.03.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The proposed analysis consists of identifying systemic aspects that can influence safety and mission fulfillment in the Evaluation and Acceptance Processes of Space Systems and Operations for Launch through the application of System-Theoretic Process Analysis, a technique capable of identifying potential hazardous design and operational flaws, including system design errors and unsafe interactions among multiple procedures and system components. This research identifies losses, hazards, system-level safety constraints, the control structure of the general system, unsafe control actions, loss scenarios that could occur and related causal factors, detecting improvement possibilities for future verifications, evaluations, approvals, and acceptances of space systems and launch operations. These findings can promote safety in space system designs and operations, supporting the activities conducted by launch vehicle and payload developers, certification authorities, and launch centers management, enabling means to proactively act in order to mitigate risks, avoiding unsafe actions and undesired system behaviors, or even to mitigating their consequences. The practical applications of this work can result in safety and mission fulfillment improvements for safety management systems, launch approval regulations and standards; launch operation procedures; space systems design; vehicle, payload, and ground support equipment productions; systems testing; and launch authorization processes.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":37283,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Space Safety Engineering","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468896724000405/pdfft?md5=36efe936ca5b239c095528f7cc58520f&pid=1-s2.0-S2468896724000405-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Space Safety Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468896724000405","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, AEROSPACE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The proposed analysis consists of identifying systemic aspects that can influence safety and mission fulfillment in the Evaluation and Acceptance Processes of Space Systems and Operations for Launch through the application of System-Theoretic Process Analysis, a technique capable of identifying potential hazardous design and operational flaws, including system design errors and unsafe interactions among multiple procedures and system components. This research identifies losses, hazards, system-level safety constraints, the control structure of the general system, unsafe control actions, loss scenarios that could occur and related causal factors, detecting improvement possibilities for future verifications, evaluations, approvals, and acceptances of space systems and launch operations. These findings can promote safety in space system designs and operations, supporting the activities conducted by launch vehicle and payload developers, certification authorities, and launch centers management, enabling means to proactively act in order to mitigate risks, avoiding unsafe actions and undesired system behaviors, or even to mitigating their consequences. The practical applications of this work can result in safety and mission fulfillment improvements for safety management systems, launch approval regulations and standards; launch operation procedures; space systems design; vehicle, payload, and ground support equipment productions; systems testing; and launch authorization processes.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于系统理论方法的空间系统和操作评估与验收过程的安全分析
拟议的分析包括通过应用系统理论过程分析,确定在空间系统和发射操作的评估和验收过程中可能影响安全和任务完成的系统方面,系统理论过程分析是一种能够确定潜在危险的设计和操作缺陷的技术,包括系统设计错误以及多个程序和系统组件之间不安全的相互作用。这项研究确定了损失、危险、系统级安全限制、一般系统的控制结构、不安全的控制行动、可能发生的损失情况和相关的因果因素,为今后空间系统和发射操作的验证、评估、批准和验收发现了改进的可能性。这些发现可以促进空间系统设计和运行的安全,支持运载火箭和有效载荷开发人员、认证机构和发射中心管理层开展的活动,使他们能够采取主动行动,以减轻风险,避免不安全的行动和不希望出现的系统行为,甚至减轻其后果。这项工作的实际应用可以改进安全管理系统、发射审批条例和标准、发射操作程序、空间系统设计、运载火箭、有效载荷和地面支持设备生产、系统测试和发射授权程序的安全和任务完成情况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Space Safety Engineering
Journal of Space Safety Engineering Engineering-Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
80
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Efforts in ensuring safety and transparency in space activities in the Asia-Pacific A tale of three failure-oriented-accelerated-test (FOAT) types and their roles in assuring aerospace electronics-and-photonics reliability: Perspective Functional status of the human cardiorespiratory system during a one-year expedition at Vostok station in central Antarctica as a model of a long-term lunar base Safety analysis of evaluation and acceptance processes for space systems and operations based on system-theoretic approach
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1