Challenges and Lessons from Conducting a Community-Engaged Evaluation of a Community Advisory Board–A Case Study from Flint

S. Cargill, Bryan Spencer, Briah Spencer
{"title":"Challenges and Lessons from Conducting a Community-Engaged Evaluation of a Community Advisory Board–A Case Study from Flint","authors":"S. Cargill, Bryan Spencer, Briah Spencer","doi":"10.1353/cpr.2024.a922327","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract: Community-engaged research often poses challenges due to exactly those qualities that make it desirable: it provides a new model of research that differs in many ways from top-down, university-led, prospectively designed approaches. While many have discussed the challenges to conducting community-engaged research, few have provided precise and generalizable lessons for how to surmount these challenges. Here we discuss the challenges experienced in a project that was community-engaged at three levels: 1) a research team consisting of an academic and a community partner as well as a community and academic research assistant, 2) the research team engaged with a Community Advisory Board called the CBOP-CERB (Community Based Organization Partners-Community Ethics Research Board) throughout the project, and 3) the research involved recruiting community participants from an area with a historical distrust of researchers and research: Flint Michigan. We also discuss administrative challenges that this multilevel community-engagement posed. Most important, we provide practical lessons in order for future community-engaged research to avoid or mitigate many of these challenges.","PeriodicalId":503736,"journal":{"name":"Progress in Community Health Partnerships: Research, Education, and Action","volume":"81 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Progress in Community Health Partnerships: Research, Education, and Action","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/cpr.2024.a922327","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract: Community-engaged research often poses challenges due to exactly those qualities that make it desirable: it provides a new model of research that differs in many ways from top-down, university-led, prospectively designed approaches. While many have discussed the challenges to conducting community-engaged research, few have provided precise and generalizable lessons for how to surmount these challenges. Here we discuss the challenges experienced in a project that was community-engaged at three levels: 1) a research team consisting of an academic and a community partner as well as a community and academic research assistant, 2) the research team engaged with a Community Advisory Board called the CBOP-CERB (Community Based Organization Partners-Community Ethics Research Board) throughout the project, and 3) the research involved recruiting community participants from an area with a historical distrust of researchers and research: Flint Michigan. We also discuss administrative challenges that this multilevel community-engagement posed. Most important, we provide practical lessons in order for future community-engaged research to avoid or mitigate many of these challenges.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对社区咨询委员会进行社区参与式评估的挑战和经验教训--弗林特案例研究
摘要:社区参与式研究往往会带来一些挑战,而这些挑战恰恰是社区参与式研究的可取之处:它提供了一种新的研究模式,在很多方面都不同于自上而下、大学主导、前瞻性设计的研究方法。虽然很多人都讨论过开展社区参与式研究面临的挑战,但很少有人能为如何克服这些挑战提供准确、可推广的经验。在此,我们将从三个层面讨论一个社区参与项目所遇到的挑战:1)研究团队由一名学者和一名社区合作伙伴以及一名社区和学者研究助理组成;2)研究团队在整个项目过程中与一个名为 CBOP-CERB(社区组织合作伙伴-社区伦理研究委员会)的社区咨询委员会合作;3)研究涉及从一个历来不信任研究人员和研究的地区招募社区参与者:密歇根州弗林特市。我们还讨论了这种多层次社区参与所带来的管理挑战。最重要的是,我们为未来的社区参与研究提供了实用的经验,以避免或减轻其中的许多挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Lessons from Two Latino Communities Working with Academic Partners to Increase Access to COVID-19 Testing A Model of Community Health Worker Integration into Schools: Community-based Participatory Research in Action Community Health Workers Deliver Mental Health Intervention to Uninsured Latinx in Baltimore: Evaluation and Lessons Learned in a Pilot Program A Community-Based Participatory Approach in Applying the Sociocultural Resilience Model in U.S–Mexico Border Communities Evaluating the Impact and Effectiveness of Flint's Community Ethics Review Board (CBOP-CERB): A Pilot Study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1