Born on the wrong side of the tracks: Exploring the causal effects of segregation on infant health

IF 3.4 2区 经济学 Q1 ECONOMICS Journal of Health Economics Pub Date : 2024-03-20 DOI:10.1016/j.jhealeco.2024.102876
Hoa Vu , Tiffany L. Green , Laura E.T. Swan
{"title":"Born on the wrong side of the tracks: Exploring the causal effects of segregation on infant health","authors":"Hoa Vu ,&nbsp;Tiffany L. Green ,&nbsp;Laura E.T. Swan","doi":"10.1016/j.jhealeco.2024.102876","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Prior research has found that a high level of residential racial segregation, or the degree to which racial/ethnic groups are isolated from one another, is associated with worsened infant health outcomes, particularly among non-Hispanic (NH) Black infant populations. However, because exposure to segregation is non-random, it is unclear whether and to what extent segregation is causally linked to infant health. To overcome this empirical limitation, we leverage exogenous variation in the placement of railroad tracks in the 19th century to predict contemporary segregation, an approach first introduced by Ananat (2011). In alignment with prior literature, we find that residential segregation has statistically significant associations with negative birth outcomes among Black infant populations in the area. Using OLS methods underestimates the negative impacts of segregation on infant health. We fail to detect comparable effects on health outcomes among NH White infant populations. Further, we identify several key mechanisms by which residential segregation could influence health outcomes among Black infant populations, including lower access to prenatal care during the first trimester, higher levels of anti-Black prejudice, greater transportation barriers, and increased food insecurity. Given that poor birth outcomes have adverse effects on adults’ health and well-being, the findings suggest that in-utero exposure to residential segregation could have important implications for Black–White inequality over the life course.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":50186,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Health Economics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Health Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167629624000213","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Prior research has found that a high level of residential racial segregation, or the degree to which racial/ethnic groups are isolated from one another, is associated with worsened infant health outcomes, particularly among non-Hispanic (NH) Black infant populations. However, because exposure to segregation is non-random, it is unclear whether and to what extent segregation is causally linked to infant health. To overcome this empirical limitation, we leverage exogenous variation in the placement of railroad tracks in the 19th century to predict contemporary segregation, an approach first introduced by Ananat (2011). In alignment with prior literature, we find that residential segregation has statistically significant associations with negative birth outcomes among Black infant populations in the area. Using OLS methods underestimates the negative impacts of segregation on infant health. We fail to detect comparable effects on health outcomes among NH White infant populations. Further, we identify several key mechanisms by which residential segregation could influence health outcomes among Black infant populations, including lower access to prenatal care during the first trimester, higher levels of anti-Black prejudice, greater transportation barriers, and increased food insecurity. Given that poor birth outcomes have adverse effects on adults’ health and well-being, the findings suggest that in-utero exposure to residential segregation could have important implications for Black–White inequality over the life course.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
生不逢时:探索种族隔离对婴儿健康的因果影响
先前的研究发现,高度的居住种族隔离或种族/民族群体相互隔离的程度与婴儿健康状况恶化有关,尤其是在非西班牙裔(NH)黑人婴儿群体中。然而,由于受到隔离是非随机的,目前还不清楚隔离是否以及在多大程度上与婴儿健康有因果关系。为了克服这一经验上的局限性,我们利用 19 世纪铁轨位置的外生变化来预测当代的种族隔离,这种方法由 Ananat(2011 年)首次提出。与之前的文献一致,我们发现住宅隔离与该地区黑人婴儿的负面出生结果有显著的统计学关联。使用 OLS 方法低估了隔离对婴儿健康的负面影响。我们未能检测到对新罕布什尔州白人婴儿健康结果的类似影响。此外,我们还发现了住宅隔离可能影响黑人婴儿健康结果的几种关键机制,包括前三个月获得产前护理的机会较少、反黑人偏见程度较高、交通障碍较多以及粮食不安全程度增加。鉴于不良的出生结果会对成年人的健康和福祉产生不利影响,研究结果表明,胎儿时期受到的住宅隔离可能会对黑人-白人一生中的不平等产生重要影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Health Economics
Journal of Health Economics 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
2.90%
发文量
96
审稿时长
49 days
期刊介绍: This journal seeks articles related to the economics of health and medical care. Its scope will include the following topics: Production and supply of health services; Demand and utilization of health services; Financing of health services; Determinants of health, including investments in health and risky health behaviors; Economic consequences of ill-health; Behavioral models of demanders, suppliers and other health care agencies; Evaluation of policy interventions that yield economic insights; Efficiency and distributional aspects of health policy; and such other topics as the Editors may deem appropriate.
期刊最新文献
Harm reduction for addictive consumption: When does it improve health and when does it backfire? The maternal and infant health consequences of restricted access to abortion in the United States The effects of tobacco 21 laws on smoking and vaping: Evidence from panel data and biomarkers The impact of children's access to public health insurance on their cognitive development and behavior Medical ethics and physician motivations
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1