Assessment of quality of life and wellbeing in mouse preclinical research – A scoping review

A. Sanz-Moreno , P. da Silva-Buttkus , C.B. Terwee , M. Raess , H. Fuchs , V. Gailus-Durner , M. Hrabě de Angelis
{"title":"Assessment of quality of life and wellbeing in mouse preclinical research – A scoping review","authors":"A. Sanz-Moreno ,&nbsp;P. da Silva-Buttkus ,&nbsp;C.B. Terwee ,&nbsp;M. Raess ,&nbsp;H. Fuchs ,&nbsp;V. Gailus-Durner ,&nbsp;M. Hrabě de Angelis","doi":"10.1016/j.nsa.2024.104058","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Mouse preclinical research is of great scientific interest to understand the mechanisms of human diseases and test potential therapeutic interventions. Researchers characterize biological and physiological traits, behaviors and disease symptoms using standardized phenotypic protocols in the context of <em>in vivo</em> mouse studies. However, the procedures applied do not always fully translate to reported outcomes in clinical trials. Quality of life (QoL) and wellbeing (WB) are particularly relevant outcomes in human medicine in general, and in neurology in particular, that are routinely measured by patient self-reports but rarely monitored in mouse research. In this novel scoping review, we have identified and described the instruments/tests and outcomes used to assess QoL and WB in recent mouse research (spanning 13 years). We found that WB was stated to be measured more frequently in murine studies (77 publications fulfilled our selection criteria) than QoL (only 13 articles). Instruments measuring WB were commonly used in neurology but less frequently in behavior and psychiatric research articles. Interestingly, we found a high variability of QoL and WB instruments/tests used as well as outcomes measured in the reviewed mouse studies. In addition, among similar parameters tested, we observed variable methodological procedures and mouse sample sizes. Thus, there is a lack of consensus on how to measure QoL and WB in the mouse research field. For ensuring a better translation from mouse to human, outcomes that are important in clinical trials (e.g., QoL and WB) should be measured in mouse studies. Finally, we would like to point out that a proper standardization of QoL and WB assessment protocols, for instance through a modified Delphi consultation survey, should be pursued by the mouse research community.</p></div><div><h3>Review registration</h3><p>The study was registered on the PROSPERO Database (registration number CRD42018103507)</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100952,"journal":{"name":"Neuroscience Applied","volume":"3 ","pages":"Article 104058"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772408524001236/pdfft?md5=20b353ef7b770a537da517933c99d5d5&pid=1-s2.0-S2772408524001236-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neuroscience Applied","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772408524001236","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Mouse preclinical research is of great scientific interest to understand the mechanisms of human diseases and test potential therapeutic interventions. Researchers characterize biological and physiological traits, behaviors and disease symptoms using standardized phenotypic protocols in the context of in vivo mouse studies. However, the procedures applied do not always fully translate to reported outcomes in clinical trials. Quality of life (QoL) and wellbeing (WB) are particularly relevant outcomes in human medicine in general, and in neurology in particular, that are routinely measured by patient self-reports but rarely monitored in mouse research. In this novel scoping review, we have identified and described the instruments/tests and outcomes used to assess QoL and WB in recent mouse research (spanning 13 years). We found that WB was stated to be measured more frequently in murine studies (77 publications fulfilled our selection criteria) than QoL (only 13 articles). Instruments measuring WB were commonly used in neurology but less frequently in behavior and psychiatric research articles. Interestingly, we found a high variability of QoL and WB instruments/tests used as well as outcomes measured in the reviewed mouse studies. In addition, among similar parameters tested, we observed variable methodological procedures and mouse sample sizes. Thus, there is a lack of consensus on how to measure QoL and WB in the mouse research field. For ensuring a better translation from mouse to human, outcomes that are important in clinical trials (e.g., QoL and WB) should be measured in mouse studies. Finally, we would like to point out that a proper standardization of QoL and WB assessment protocols, for instance through a modified Delphi consultation survey, should be pursued by the mouse research community.

Review registration

The study was registered on the PROSPERO Database (registration number CRD42018103507)

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
小鼠临床前研究中的生活质量和幸福感评估--范围综述
小鼠临床前研究对了解人类疾病的机理和测试潜在的治疗干预措施具有重要的科学意义。研究人员在体内小鼠研究中使用标准化的表型方案来描述生物和生理特征、行为和疾病症状。然而,所采用的程序并不总是能完全转化为临床试验中报告的结果。生活质量(QoL)和幸福感(WB)是人类医学,尤其是神经病学中特别相关的结果,这些结果通常通过患者的自我报告来测量,但在小鼠研究中却很少受到监测。在这项新颖的范围界定综述中,我们确定并描述了近期小鼠研究中(跨越 13 年)用于评估 QoL 和 WB 的工具/测试和结果。我们发现,与 QoL(仅有 13 篇文章)相比,WB 在小鼠研究中的测量频率更高(有 77 篇文章符合我们的选择标准)。在神经学研究中,WB 测量工具的使用频率较高,但在行为学和精神病学研究文章中使用频率较低。有趣的是,我们发现在所审查的小鼠研究中,所使用的 QoL 和 WB 工具/测试以及所测量的结果具有很大的差异性。此外,在测试的类似参数中,我们还观察到不同的方法程序和小鼠样本量。因此,在小鼠研究领域如何测量 QoL 和 WB 还缺乏共识。为了确保更好地从小鼠转化到人类,应该在小鼠研究中测量临床试验中重要的结果(如 QoL 和 WB)。最后,我们想指出的是,小鼠研究界应努力实现 QoL 和 WB 评估方案的适当标准化,例如通过修改后的德尔菲咨询调查。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Testing the usefulness of a quality system in preclinical research Telomere length and mitochondrial DNA copy number in association with trauma-focused psychotherapy efficacy Knowledge gaps in psychedelic medicalisation: Preclinical and neuroimaging mechanisms A machine learning pipeline for efficient differentiation between bipolar and major depressive disorder based on multimodal structural neuroimaging Progress and developments in pharmacogenomics and pharmacoepigenomics discovery and translation for the personalization of pharmacological treatments in psychiatric disorders
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1