From Zero to Hero: A New Breakthrough of Stimulation Method by Combining Acidizing and Cyclic Extended Breakdown in Sawah Field

_. Ilfi, Hanif Setiyawan, Ali Masyhuri, _. Rusli, Christian Eliezer Mileota, Iftikar Luthfi Ramadhan, Rinenggo Nugroho, M. Afton
{"title":"From Zero to Hero: A New Breakthrough of Stimulation Method by Combining Acidizing and Cyclic Extended Breakdown in Sawah Field","authors":"_. Ilfi, Hanif Setiyawan, Ali Masyhuri, _. Rusli, Christian Eliezer Mileota, Iftikar Luthfi Ramadhan, Rinenggo Nugroho, M. Afton","doi":"10.2118/218353-ms","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n The Sawah field, a waterflood field, currently produces approximately 130,000 BFPD with an average 96% water-cut. The Fluid In Fluid Out (FIFO) stands at only 0.6, resulting in suboptimal waterflood performance. One cause of the low injection rate in Sawah field is injector plugging due to solid content and/or scale, and characteristics of the reservoir itself. Pressure Transient Analysis (PTA) further validates significant skin and permeability reduction.\n To improve the injection rate, workover activities are conducted on the targeted well using a combination of the Acidizing and C-EBD (Cyclic Extended Breakdown) methods. This involves a chemical and mechanical effort, where the acid dissolves scale, and the C-EBD creates fractures. Compatibility tests are conducted between acid and water production, as well as acid and water injection. A 15% HCl simple acid is injected with a 3-feet penetration near the wellbore using coiled tubing. Following soaking, the treatment continues by injecting water into the reservoir in 6 cycles, with 350-700 bbls of water for each cycle.\n During workover activities, improved injectivity was observed through Step Rate Tests (SRT). After acidizing, a rate of 2.5 bpm at 1,600 psi was achieved, followed by 3 bpm at 1,350 psi after the first 3 cycles of C-EBD. Further injectivity improvements occurred during subsequent C-EBD cycles, with the first 3 cycles reaching 2.4 bpm at 1,300 psi, and the next 3 cycles achieving 3.5 bpm at a similar pressure. Post Put on Injection (POI), the injection rate increased from 0-30 to 5,100-8,500 BWIPD, marking the well's highest injection rate in history. This notable success opens opportunity for Sawah Field, facilitating the reactivation of trade-off wells and increased capacity to handle additional fluids from size-up jobs or new wells. The collaborative efforts of the Subsurface, Research, and Workover Teams in the Sawah field were vital in achieving this remarkable result, contributing to longer injection well lifetimes, preventing overflow at surface facilities, and enhancing employee satisfaction.\n A lesson learned emphasizes the need to verify flow meter readings before and during execution, facilitating the prompt identification of problems or areas for improvement. Additionally, conducting an extra Step Rate Test (SRT) before acidizing serves as an added baseline. This successful approach is currently being implemented in other injectors within the Sawah field facing similar plugging issues, showcasing its ongoing effectiveness in enhancing operational practices.","PeriodicalId":517791,"journal":{"name":"Day 2 Wed, March 20, 2024","volume":"35 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 2 Wed, March 20, 2024","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/218353-ms","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Sawah field, a waterflood field, currently produces approximately 130,000 BFPD with an average 96% water-cut. The Fluid In Fluid Out (FIFO) stands at only 0.6, resulting in suboptimal waterflood performance. One cause of the low injection rate in Sawah field is injector plugging due to solid content and/or scale, and characteristics of the reservoir itself. Pressure Transient Analysis (PTA) further validates significant skin and permeability reduction. To improve the injection rate, workover activities are conducted on the targeted well using a combination of the Acidizing and C-EBD (Cyclic Extended Breakdown) methods. This involves a chemical and mechanical effort, where the acid dissolves scale, and the C-EBD creates fractures. Compatibility tests are conducted between acid and water production, as well as acid and water injection. A 15% HCl simple acid is injected with a 3-feet penetration near the wellbore using coiled tubing. Following soaking, the treatment continues by injecting water into the reservoir in 6 cycles, with 350-700 bbls of water for each cycle. During workover activities, improved injectivity was observed through Step Rate Tests (SRT). After acidizing, a rate of 2.5 bpm at 1,600 psi was achieved, followed by 3 bpm at 1,350 psi after the first 3 cycles of C-EBD. Further injectivity improvements occurred during subsequent C-EBD cycles, with the first 3 cycles reaching 2.4 bpm at 1,300 psi, and the next 3 cycles achieving 3.5 bpm at a similar pressure. Post Put on Injection (POI), the injection rate increased from 0-30 to 5,100-8,500 BWIPD, marking the well's highest injection rate in history. This notable success opens opportunity for Sawah Field, facilitating the reactivation of trade-off wells and increased capacity to handle additional fluids from size-up jobs or new wells. The collaborative efforts of the Subsurface, Research, and Workover Teams in the Sawah field were vital in achieving this remarkable result, contributing to longer injection well lifetimes, preventing overflow at surface facilities, and enhancing employee satisfaction. A lesson learned emphasizes the need to verify flow meter readings before and during execution, facilitating the prompt identification of problems or areas for improvement. Additionally, conducting an extra Step Rate Test (SRT) before acidizing serves as an added baseline. This successful approach is currently being implemented in other injectors within the Sawah field facing similar plugging issues, showcasing its ongoing effectiveness in enhancing operational practices.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
从 "零 "到 "英雄":Sawah 油田酸化与循环扩展破乳相结合的刺激方法新突破
Sawah 油田是一个注水油田,目前产量约为 130,000 BFPD,平均含水率为 96%。流体进流体出(FIFO)仅为 0.6,导致注水性能不理想。Sawah 油田注水率低的原因之一是固体含量和/或水垢以及储层本身的特性导致注水器堵塞。压力瞬态分析(PTA)进一步验证了皮层和渗透率的显著降低。为了提高注入率,在目标井上采用酸化法和 C-EBD(循环延长破裂)法相结合的方法进行修井活动。这涉及到化学和机械方面的努力,其中酸溶解水垢,C-EBD 形成裂缝。在酸和水的生产以及酸和水的注入之间进行兼容性测试。使用盘管在井筒附近注入 3 英尺深的 15%盐酸单酸。浸泡后,继续进行处理,分 6 个周期向储层注水,每个周期注水 350-700 桶。在修井活动中,通过阶跃速率测试(SRT)观察到注入率有所提高。酸化后,在 1,600 psi 压力下实现了 2.5 bpm 的注入率,在 C-EBD 前 3 个循环后,在 1,350 psi 压力下实现了 3 bpm 的注入率。在随后的 C-EBD 循环中,注入率进一步提高,前 3 个循环在 1,300 psi 压力下达到 2.4 bpm,随后 3 个循环在类似压力下达到 3.5 bpm。注入后(POI),注入率从 0-30 增加到 5,100-8,500 BWIPD,创下该井历史最高注入率。这一显著的成功为 Sawah 油田带来了机遇,有利于重新启用折衷井,并提高了处理来自规模扩大工作或新井的额外流体的能力。Sawah 油田的地下、研究和修井团队通力合作,取得了这一显著成果,为延长注水井寿命、防止地面设施溢流和提高员工满意度做出了重要贡献。汲取的经验教训强调,在施工前和施工过程中都要核实流量计读数,以便及时发现问题或需要改进的地方。此外,在酸化前进行额外的阶跃速率测试 (SRT) 可作为额外的基准。这一成功的方法目前正在 Sawah 油田内面临类似堵塞问题的其他注入器中实施,展示了其在加强操作实践方面的持续有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Cloud-Based Planning and Real-Time Algorithms Improve Coiled Tubing Cleanout Efficiency Improve CT Milling Operations with 20/20 Vision - Combined Downhole and Operational Data From Zero to Hero: A New Breakthrough of Stimulation Method by Combining Acidizing and Cyclic Extended Breakdown in Sawah Field Deciphering the Well Complexity Index for Coiled Tubing Interventions, a Unique Factor for Better Engineering and Operational Planning Decoding Hydrogen Embrittlement in High Strength Coiled Tubing: Insights from Acid-Induced Failures, Field Data Analysis, and Corrosion Management Strategies
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1