Treading on the Tiger’s Tail: Chinese Wuxia and Japanese Jidaigeki Action Films Reacting to State Censorship in the 1930s and 1940s

Zerui Pan
{"title":"Treading on the Tiger’s Tail: Chinese Wuxia and Japanese Jidaigeki Action Films Reacting to State Censorship in the 1930s and 1940s","authors":"Zerui Pan","doi":"10.5070/cr320298","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article highlights the relationship between wuxia (martial heroes) and jidaigeki (period drama) action films and state censorship in the 1930s and 1940s. I first introduce readers to key East-Asian literary conventions that portray righteous warriors who incarnate their moral codes with swords. I then illustrate the political contexts in 1930s China and 1940s Japan which caused the popular film genres of wuxia and jidaigeki to become politically problematic and therefore strictly censored. I closely examine director Bu Wancang’s 1931 wuxia film A Spray of Plum Blossoms and Kurosawa Akira’s jidaigeki 1945 film Treading on the Tiger’s Tail, investigating creative solutions each director found in order to release their respective films despite censorship pressures. There are three inventions both directors pioneered in their work, namely “ostensible exactness” in setting; “patriotic warriors” in characterization; and “swordless fights” in presenting spectacular action scenes. I argue that although these solutions failed to restore both genres back to their former popularity, Kurosawa’s film paved the way for the success of his world-class jidaigeki in the 1950s, and Bu’s wuxia led to the emergence of kung fu films in the 1960s. My critical analysis underscores the innovative creativity of Chinese wuxia and Japanese jidaigeki films while calling attention to the artistic and cultural legacies of these two popular cinematic genres. The comparison demonstrates how film censorship may undermine or even destroy traditions that have a long history and deep cultural roots.","PeriodicalId":517860,"journal":{"name":"Challenger Research Journal","volume":"76 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Challenger Research Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5070/cr320298","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article highlights the relationship between wuxia (martial heroes) and jidaigeki (period drama) action films and state censorship in the 1930s and 1940s. I first introduce readers to key East-Asian literary conventions that portray righteous warriors who incarnate their moral codes with swords. I then illustrate the political contexts in 1930s China and 1940s Japan which caused the popular film genres of wuxia and jidaigeki to become politically problematic and therefore strictly censored. I closely examine director Bu Wancang’s 1931 wuxia film A Spray of Plum Blossoms and Kurosawa Akira’s jidaigeki 1945 film Treading on the Tiger’s Tail, investigating creative solutions each director found in order to release their respective films despite censorship pressures. There are three inventions both directors pioneered in their work, namely “ostensible exactness” in setting; “patriotic warriors” in characterization; and “swordless fights” in presenting spectacular action scenes. I argue that although these solutions failed to restore both genres back to their former popularity, Kurosawa’s film paved the way for the success of his world-class jidaigeki in the 1950s, and Bu’s wuxia led to the emergence of kung fu films in the 1960s. My critical analysis underscores the innovative creativity of Chinese wuxia and Japanese jidaigeki films while calling attention to the artistic and cultural legacies of these two popular cinematic genres. The comparison demonstrates how film censorship may undermine or even destroy traditions that have a long history and deep cultural roots.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
虎落平阳被犬欺:20 世纪 30 年代和 40 年代中国武侠片和日本动作片对国家审查制度的反应
本文重点探讨了武侠片和年代戏动作片与二十世纪三四十年代国家审查制度之间的关系。我首先向读者介绍了东亚文学的主要传统,这些传统描绘了以刀剑体现道德准则的正义战士。然后,我阐述了 20 世纪 30 年代中国和 40 年代日本的政治背景,这些政治背景导致武侠和武打片这些流行的电影类型成为政治问题,并因此受到严格审查。我仔细研究了卜万苍导演 1931 年的武侠片《梅花三弄》和黑泽明导演 1945 年的武侠片《虎尾惊魂》,探究了两位导演为顶住审查压力上映各自影片而找到的创造性解决方案。两位导演在其作品中都开创了三项发明,即在场景设置上的 "表面精确性"、在人物塑造上的 "爱国武士 "以及在呈现精彩动作场面时的 "无刀格斗"。我认为,尽管这些解决方案未能使这两种类型片恢复其昔日的受欢迎程度,但黑泽明的电影为其世界级的《地道战》在 20 世纪 50 年代的成功铺平了道路,而卜大壮的武侠片则引领了功夫片在 20 世纪 60 年代的兴起。我的批判性分析强调了中国武侠片和日本武打片的创新性,同时呼吁人们关注这两种流行电影类型的艺术和文化传承。通过比较,我们可以看到电影审查制度是如何破坏甚至摧毁具有悠久历史和深厚文化根基的传统的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Use of CRISPR/Cas9 Gene Editing Methods to Investigate the Mechanism of Trem2-Dependent Gene Expression in Macrophages Treading on the Tiger’s Tail: Chinese Wuxia and Japanese Jidaigeki Action Films Reacting to State Censorship in the 1930s and 1940s Building Trust in the AI Ecosystem by Re-Evaluating Public Perception Challenger Research Journal Volume 4
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1