The Asharshylyq in Contemporary and Public Art of Kazakhstan: The Politics of Commemorating the Kazakh Famine of the 1930s

Saltanat Shoshanova
{"title":"The Asharshylyq in Contemporary and Public Art of Kazakhstan: The Politics of Commemorating the Kazakh Famine of the 1930s","authors":"Saltanat Shoshanova","doi":"10.2979/ham.00003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract: This article explores the politics of the commemoration of the Kazakh famine of the 1930s by analyzing the commemoration strategies employed by visual artists in the period from 2012 until 2019. It identifies two types of art production on the topic—governmental public art, which avoids politicizing the famine and reads it as the greatest humanitarian catastrophe of the Soviet period, and art projects by independent artists who call the Kazakh famine a genocide. Although these two positions seem to be ideologically opposed on a rhetorical level, the article shows that the difference in the visual language used to express these opposite political positions is not always as pronounced as one would expect, and proposes several explanations for this incoherence.","PeriodicalId":517763,"journal":{"name":"History & Memory","volume":"219 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"History & Memory","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2979/ham.00003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract: This article explores the politics of the commemoration of the Kazakh famine of the 1930s by analyzing the commemoration strategies employed by visual artists in the period from 2012 until 2019. It identifies two types of art production on the topic—governmental public art, which avoids politicizing the famine and reads it as the greatest humanitarian catastrophe of the Soviet period, and art projects by independent artists who call the Kazakh famine a genocide. Although these two positions seem to be ideologically opposed on a rhetorical level, the article shows that the difference in the visual language used to express these opposite political positions is not always as pronounced as one would expect, and proposes several explanations for this incoherence.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
哈萨克斯坦当代和公共艺术中的 "阿夏尔斯里克":纪念 20 世纪 30 年代哈萨克饥荒的政治学
摘要:本文通过分析视觉艺术家在2012年至2019年期间采用的纪念策略,探讨了纪念20世纪30年代哈萨克饥荒的政治问题。文章指出了关于这一主题的两类艺术创作--避免将饥荒政治化并将其解读为苏联时期最大的人道主义灾难的政府公共艺术,以及将哈萨克饥荒称为种族灭绝的独立艺术家的艺术项目。尽管这两种立场在修辞层面上似乎在意识形态上是对立的,但文章表明,在表达这些相反的政治立场时,所使用的视觉语言的差异并不总是像人们想象的那样明显,并对这种不一致提出了几种解释。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Contested Symbolism of the "Cursed Soldiers": Hegemony, Memory and the Politics of Fear in Poland The Asharshylyq in Contemporary and Public Art of Kazakhstan: The Politics of Commemorating the Kazakh Famine of the 1930s Martyrial Memory: Imagining the Fascist Afterlife of Giovanni Berta Reassessing the EU Memory Divide: Dereifying Collective Memory through a Memory Regimes Approach Case Closed? History, Memory and the Drive to Seal the Sins of the Twentieth Century
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1