Immunogenicity and safety of boosting with a recombinant two-component SARS-CoV-2 vaccine: two randomized, parallel-controlled, phase 2 studies.

IF 5.5 3区 医学 Q1 IMMUNOLOGY Expert Review of Vaccines Pub Date : 2024-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-04-02 DOI:10.1080/14760584.2024.2334423
Abundio Balgos, Suad Hannawi, Wen-Li Chen, Alaa Abuquta, Linda Safeldin, Aala Hassan, Ahmad Alamadi, Louie Tirador, Anjuli May Jaen, Ralph Elvi Villalobos, Chen Mo, Zi-Jing Yue, Ying Ma, Qing-Shuang Wang, Ren-Du Wen, Zheng Yao, Jia-Ping Yu, Wen-Rong Yao, Jian-Hui Zhang, Kun-Xue Hong, Yong Liu, Jing-Xin Li
{"title":"Immunogenicity and safety of boosting with a recombinant two-component SARS-CoV-2 vaccine: two randomized, parallel-controlled, phase 2 studies.","authors":"Abundio Balgos, Suad Hannawi, Wen-Li Chen, Alaa Abuquta, Linda Safeldin, Aala Hassan, Ahmad Alamadi, Louie Tirador, Anjuli May Jaen, Ralph Elvi Villalobos, Chen Mo, Zi-Jing Yue, Ying Ma, Qing-Shuang Wang, Ren-Du Wen, Zheng Yao, Jia-Ping Yu, Wen-Rong Yao, Jian-Hui Zhang, Kun-Xue Hong, Yong Liu, Jing-Xin Li","doi":"10.1080/14760584.2024.2334423","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Recombinant protein vaccines are vital for broad protection against SARS-CoV-2 variants. This study assessed ReCOV as a booster in two Phase 2 trials.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>Study-1 involved subjects were randomized (1:1:1) to receive 20 μg ReCOV, 40 μg ReCOV, or an inactivated vaccine (COVILO®) in the United Arab Emirates. Study-2 participating individuals were randomized (1:1:1) to receive 20 μg ReCOV (pilot batch, ReCOV HA), 20 μg ReCOV (commercial batch, ReCOV TC), or 30 μg BNT162b2 (COMIRNATY®) in the Philippines. The primary immunogenicity objectives was to compare the geometric mean titer (GMT) and seroconversion rate (SCR) of neutralizing antibodies induced by one ReCOV booster dose with those of inactivated vaccine and BNT162b2, respectively, at 14 days post-booster.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Heterologous ReCOV booster doses were safe and induced comparable immune responses to inactivated vaccines and BNT162b2 against Omicron variants and the prototype. They showed significant advantages in cross-neutralization against multiple SARS-CoV-2 variants, surpassing inactivated vaccines and BNT162b2, with good immune persistence.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Heterologous ReCOV boosting was safe and effective, showing promise in combating COVID-19. The study highlights ReCOV's potential for enhanced protection, supported by strong cross-neutralization and immune persistence.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial registration: </strong>Study-1, www.clinicaltrials.gov, identifier is NCT05323435; Study-2, www.clinicaltrials.gov, identifier is NCT05084989.</p>","PeriodicalId":12326,"journal":{"name":"Expert Review of Vaccines","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Review of Vaccines","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14760584.2024.2334423","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/4/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Recombinant protein vaccines are vital for broad protection against SARS-CoV-2 variants. This study assessed ReCOV as a booster in two Phase 2 trials.

Research design and methods: Study-1 involved subjects were randomized (1:1:1) to receive 20 μg ReCOV, 40 μg ReCOV, or an inactivated vaccine (COVILO®) in the United Arab Emirates. Study-2 participating individuals were randomized (1:1:1) to receive 20 μg ReCOV (pilot batch, ReCOV HA), 20 μg ReCOV (commercial batch, ReCOV TC), or 30 μg BNT162b2 (COMIRNATY®) in the Philippines. The primary immunogenicity objectives was to compare the geometric mean titer (GMT) and seroconversion rate (SCR) of neutralizing antibodies induced by one ReCOV booster dose with those of inactivated vaccine and BNT162b2, respectively, at 14 days post-booster.

Results: Heterologous ReCOV booster doses were safe and induced comparable immune responses to inactivated vaccines and BNT162b2 against Omicron variants and the prototype. They showed significant advantages in cross-neutralization against multiple SARS-CoV-2 variants, surpassing inactivated vaccines and BNT162b2, with good immune persistence.

Conclusions: Heterologous ReCOV boosting was safe and effective, showing promise in combating COVID-19. The study highlights ReCOV's potential for enhanced protection, supported by strong cross-neutralization and immune persistence.

Clinical trial registration: Study-1, www.clinicaltrials.gov, identifier is NCT05323435; Study-2, www.clinicaltrials.gov, identifier is NCT05084989.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
重组双组分 SARS-CoV-2 疫苗的免疫原性和安全性:两项随机、平行对照、2 期研究。
背景:重组蛋白疫苗在提供针对 SARS-CoV-2 变异株的广泛免疫保护方面发挥着至关重要的作用。本研究在两项随机、观察者盲法、主动对照的 2 期临床试验中评估了 ReCOV 作为加强剂量的安全性和免疫原性:在研究-1中,阿拉伯联合酋长国对接种过两剂或三剂COVID-19灭活疫苗的成人进行了随机分配(1:1:1),分别接种20 μg ReCOV、40 μg ReCOV或灭活疫苗(COVILO®)。研究-2涉及在菲律宾接种两剂COVID-19灭活疫苗的受试者,他们被随机(1:1:1)分配接种20微克ReCOV(试验批次,ReCOV HA)、20微克ReCOV(商业批次,ReCOV TC)或30微克BNT162b2(COMIRNATY®)。主要免疫原性目标是比较 ReCOV 与灭活疫苗和 BNT162b2 在加强剂量后 14 天分别诱导的 SARS-CoV-2 原型活病毒中和抗体的几何平均滴度 (GMT) 和血清转换率 (SCR):结果:异源加强剂量的 ReCOV 安全、耐受性良好,在既往接种过疫苗的成人中,针对 Omicron 变体和原型引起的免疫原性反应不劣于灭活疫苗和 BNT162b2。结果表明,该产品在针对多种 SARS-CoV-2 变异株的交叉中和活性方面具有明显优势,超过了灭活疫苗和 BNT162b2。此外,免疫持久性也很好:结论:使用 ReCOV 进行异源增强证明是安全有效的,对控制 COVID-19 的流行具有良好的效果。这项研究揭示了 ReCOV 在提供增强保护方面的巨大潜力,其强大的交叉中和活性和免疫持久性为其提供了支持:研究-1,www.clinicaltrials.gov,标识符为 NCT05323435;研究-2,www.clinicaltrials.gov,标识符为 NCT05084989。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Expert Review of Vaccines
Expert Review of Vaccines 医学-免疫学
CiteScore
9.10
自引率
3.20%
发文量
136
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Expert Review of Vaccines (ISSN 1476-0584) provides expert commentary on the development, application, and clinical effectiveness of new vaccines. Coverage includes vaccine technology, vaccine adjuvants, prophylactic vaccines, therapeutic vaccines, AIDS vaccines and vaccines for defence against bioterrorism. All articles are subject to rigorous peer-review. The vaccine field has been transformed by recent technological advances, but there remain many challenges in the delivery of cost-effective, safe vaccines. Expert Review of Vaccines facilitates decision making to drive forward this exciting field.
期刊最新文献
Hookworm vaccines: current and future directions. A descriptive review on the real-world impact of Moderna, inc. COVID-19 vaccines. Estimating the time required to reach HPV vaccination targets across Europe. Vaccination strategies for patients under monoclonal antibody and other biological treatments: an updated comprehensive review based on EMA authorizations to January 2024. Comparison of preclinical efficacy of immunotherapies against HPV-induced cancers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1