Convergence insufficiency in patients with post-concussion syndrome is accompanied by a higher symptom load: a cross-sectional study.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q4 NEUROSCIENCES Brain injury Pub Date : 2024-07-02 Epub Date: 2024-03-26 DOI:10.1080/02699052.2024.2334355
Ivan Nisted, Line Amalie Hellemose, Peter Preben Eggertsen, Lene Odgaard, Toke Bek, Jørgen Feldbæk Nielsen
{"title":"Convergence insufficiency in patients with post-concussion syndrome is accompanied by a higher symptom load: a cross-sectional study.","authors":"Ivan Nisted, Line Amalie Hellemose, Peter Preben Eggertsen, Lene Odgaard, Toke Bek, Jørgen Feldbæk Nielsen","doi":"10.1080/02699052.2024.2334355","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To estimate the prevalence of convergence insufficiency (CI) in adult patients with post-concussion syndrome and determine the impact of CI on symptom load.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Cross-sectional study of 103 patients with neurological symptoms 2-6 months after a concussion. Symptoms were assessed with the Rivermead Post Concussion Symptoms Questionnaire (RPQ), and CI was diagnosed using near point of convergence, vergence facility, and the Convergence Insufficiency Symptom Survey. The RPQ score for patients with and without CI was compared, and sensitivity, specificity, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for the two visually related RPQ questions as indicators of CI were calculated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The proportion of patients diagnosed with symptomatic CI was 20.4% (95% confidence interval: 13.1-29.5%). The RPQ score was significantly higher for patients with symptomatic CI both before (<i>p</i> = .01) and after removal of the two visually related questions in the RPQ-questionnaire (<i>p</i> = .03). The two visually related RPQ questions were unable to detect CI.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In patients with post-concussion syndrome, the load of nonvisual symptoms is higher in the presence of CI. A prospective interventional study on CI is required to study the relationship between CI and other post-concussion symptoms.</p>","PeriodicalId":9082,"journal":{"name":"Brain injury","volume":" ","pages":"645-651"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brain injury","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02699052.2024.2334355","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/3/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To estimate the prevalence of convergence insufficiency (CI) in adult patients with post-concussion syndrome and determine the impact of CI on symptom load.

Methods: Cross-sectional study of 103 patients with neurological symptoms 2-6 months after a concussion. Symptoms were assessed with the Rivermead Post Concussion Symptoms Questionnaire (RPQ), and CI was diagnosed using near point of convergence, vergence facility, and the Convergence Insufficiency Symptom Survey. The RPQ score for patients with and without CI was compared, and sensitivity, specificity, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for the two visually related RPQ questions as indicators of CI were calculated.

Results: The proportion of patients diagnosed with symptomatic CI was 20.4% (95% confidence interval: 13.1-29.5%). The RPQ score was significantly higher for patients with symptomatic CI both before (p = .01) and after removal of the two visually related questions in the RPQ-questionnaire (p = .03). The two visually related RPQ questions were unable to detect CI.

Conclusion: In patients with post-concussion syndrome, the load of nonvisual symptoms is higher in the presence of CI. A prospective interventional study on CI is required to study the relationship between CI and other post-concussion symptoms.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
脑震荡后综合征患者的辐辏功能障碍伴有较重的症状负荷:一项横断面研究。
目的估算成年脑震荡后综合征患者辐辏功能障碍(CI)的患病率,并确定 CI 对症状负荷的影响:方法:对 103 名脑震荡后 2-6 个月出现神经症状的患者进行横断面研究。使用里弗米德脑震荡后症状调查表(RPQ)对症状进行评估,并使用辐辏近点、辐辏设施和辐辏功能障碍症状调查表对 CI 进行诊断。比较了有 CI 和无 CI 患者的 RPQ 得分,并计算了作为 CI 指标的两个视觉相关 RPQ 问题的敏感性、特异性和接收器操作特征曲线下面积:被诊断为无症状 CI 的患者比例为 20.4%(95% 置信区间:13.1-29.5%)。在去除 RPQ 问卷中两个视觉相关问题之前(p = .01)和之后(p = .03),无症状 CI 患者的 RPQ 得分均明显较高。这两个与视觉相关的 RPQ 问题无法检测出 CI:结论:在脑震荡后综合征患者中,如果存在 CI,非视觉症状的负荷会更高。需要对 CI 进行前瞻性干预研究,以研究 CI 与其他脑震荡后症状之间的关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Brain injury
Brain injury 医学-康复医学
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
5.30%
发文量
148
审稿时长
12 months
期刊介绍: Brain Injury publishes critical information relating to research and clinical practice, adult and pediatric populations. The journal covers a full range of relevant topics relating to clinical, translational, and basic science research. Manuscripts address emergency and acute medical care, acute and post-acute rehabilitation, family and vocational issues, and long-term supports. Coverage includes assessment and interventions for functional, communication, neurological and psychological disorders.
期刊最新文献
Comparison of concordance and predictive validity of head injuries from parental reports and medical records. Leaving on a Jet Plane: reflections on working with a patient with complex acquired brain injury secondary to attempted suicide. Barriers and enablers to physical activity for individuals living with traumatic brain injury: a mixed methods systematic review. Approach to adult Moyamoya disease presenting as bilateral anterior circulation infarcts: a case report. The correlation between the severity of paroxysmal sympathetic hyperactivity and plasma catecholamine levels in patients with severe traumatic brain injury.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1