End-stage renal disease should not Be considered a contraindication for veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Journal of the Formosan Medical Association Pub Date : 2024-09-01 DOI:10.1016/j.jfma.2024.03.012
{"title":"End-stage renal disease should not Be considered a contraindication for veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.jfma.2024.03.012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>This study aims to determine whether end-stage renal disease (ESRD) is a true contraindication for extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in adult patients.</p></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><p>Adult patients who received VA-ECMO at National Taiwan University Hospital between January 2010 and December 2021 were included. Patients who received regular dialysis before the index admission were included in the ESRD group. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>1341 patients were included in the analysis, 121 of whom had ESRD before index admission. The ESRD group was older (62.3 versus 56.8 years; <em>P</em> &lt; 0.01) and had more comorbidities. Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) was used more frequently in the ESRD group (66.1% versus 51.6%; <em>P</em> &lt; 0.001). The ESRD group had higher in-hospital mortality rates (72.7% versus 63.3%; <em>P</em> = 0.03). In the ECPR subgroup, there was no difference of survival between ESRD and others(<em>P</em> = 0.56). In the multivariate Cox regression, ESRD was not an independent predictor for mortality (<em>P</em> = 0.20).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>ESRD was not an independent predictor of in-hospital mortality after VA-ECMO. The survival of ESRD patients was not inferior to those without ESRD when receiving ECPR. Therefore, ESRD should not be considered a contraindication to VA-ECMO in adults.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":17305,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Formosan Medical Association","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0929664624001736/pdfft?md5=11e2f63199fb4c8b5e12632fb391a8d0&pid=1-s2.0-S0929664624001736-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Formosan Medical Association","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0929664624001736","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

This study aims to determine whether end-stage renal disease (ESRD) is a true contraindication for extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in adult patients.

Materials and methods

Adult patients who received VA-ECMO at National Taiwan University Hospital between January 2010 and December 2021 were included. Patients who received regular dialysis before the index admission were included in the ESRD group. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality.

Results

1341 patients were included in the analysis, 121 of whom had ESRD before index admission. The ESRD group was older (62.3 versus 56.8 years; P < 0.01) and had more comorbidities. Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) was used more frequently in the ESRD group (66.1% versus 51.6%; P < 0.001). The ESRD group had higher in-hospital mortality rates (72.7% versus 63.3%; P = 0.03). In the ECPR subgroup, there was no difference of survival between ESRD and others(P = 0.56). In the multivariate Cox regression, ESRD was not an independent predictor for mortality (P = 0.20).

Conclusion

ESRD was not an independent predictor of in-hospital mortality after VA-ECMO. The survival of ESRD patients was not inferior to those without ESRD when receiving ECPR. Therefore, ESRD should not be considered a contraindication to VA-ECMO in adults.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
终末期肾病不应被视为静脉-动脉体外膜氧合的禁忌症。
目的:本研究旨在确定终末期肾病(ESRD)是否是成年患者体外膜氧合的真正禁忌症:纳入 2010 年 1 月至 2021 年 12 月期间在台湾大学医院接受 VA-ECMO 的成人患者。入院前接受定期透析的患者被纳入 ESRD 组。主要结果为院内死亡率:结果:1341 名患者被纳入分析,其中 121 人在入院前患有 ESRD。ESRD组患者年龄较大(62.3岁对56.8岁;P 结论:ESRD并不是预测住院死亡率的独立因素:ESRD不是VA-ECMO后院内死亡率的独立预测因素。接受 ECPR 的 ESRD 患者的存活率并不比没有 ESRD 的患者低。因此,ESRD不应被视为成人VA-ECMO的禁忌症。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
6.20%
发文量
381
审稿时长
57 days
期刊介绍: Journal of the Formosan Medical Association (JFMA), published continuously since 1902, is an open access international general medical journal of the Formosan Medical Association based in Taipei, Taiwan. It is indexed in Current Contents/ Clinical Medicine, Medline, ciSearch, CAB Abstracts, Embase, SIIC Data Bases, Research Alert, BIOSIS, Biological Abstracts, Scopus and ScienceDirect. As a general medical journal, research related to clinical practice and research in all fields of medicine and related disciplines are considered for publication. Article types considered include perspectives, reviews, original papers, case reports, brief communications, correspondence and letters to the editor.
期刊最新文献
Comment on "Very early neurological deterioration during intravenous thrombolysis in patients with acute ischemic stroke". Comment on "The factors impacting on gleason score upgrading in prostate cancer with initial low gleason scores". Follow-up of inguinal hernia repairs using a modified Kugel mesh without the optional onlay mesh for more than 10 years. Author's reply: Severity of tongue base collapse in various body positions in patients with obstructive sleep apnea: A trajectory analysis 2024; 123(11): 1175-1181. The benefits of transnasal endoscopy compared to conventional endoscopy in adolescents.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1