Evaluating the Role of Competency-Based Behavioral Interviewing in Holistic Medical School Admissions.

IF 5.3 2区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES Academic Medicine Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2024-03-25 DOI:10.1097/ACM.0000000000005708
Mario A Davidson, Regina G Russell, Philip D Walker, John A Zic, Larry R Churchill, D Catherine Fuchs, Bonnie M Miller
{"title":"Evaluating the Role of Competency-Based Behavioral Interviewing in Holistic Medical School Admissions.","authors":"Mario A Davidson, Regina G Russell, Philip D Walker, John A Zic, Larry R Churchill, D Catherine Fuchs, Bonnie M Miller","doi":"10.1097/ACM.0000000000005708","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Problem: </strong>Holistic review is a multifaceted concept that aims to increase diversity and applicant fit with program needs by complementing traditional academic requirements with appraisal of a wider range of personal characteristics and experiences. Behavioral interviewing has been practiced and studied in human resources, business, and organizational psychology for over 50 years. Its premise is that future performance can be anticipated from past actions. However, many of the interview approaches within the holistic framework are resource intensive and logistically challenging.</p><p><strong>Approach: </strong>The Vanderbilt University School of Medicine instituted a competency-based behavioral interview (CBBI) to augment the selection process in 2012. Behavioral interviews are based on key competencies needed for entering students and require applicants to reflect on their actual experiences and what they learned from them. The authors reviewed 5 years of experience (2015-2019) to evaluate how CBBI scores contributed to the overall assessment of applicants for admission.</p><p><strong>Outcomes: </strong>The final admission committee decision for each applicant was determined by reviewing multiple factors, with no single assessment determining the final score. The CBBI and summary interview scores showed a strong association ( P < .005), suggesting that the summary interviewer, who had access to the full applicant file, and the CBBI interviewer, who did not, assessed similar strengths despite the 2 different approaches, or that the strengths assessed tracked in the same direction. Students whose 2 interview scores were not aligned were less likely to be accepted to the school.</p><p><strong>Next steps: </strong>The review raised awareness about the cultural aspects of interpreting the competencies and the need to expand our cultural framework throughout interviewer training. Findings indicate that CBBIs have the potential to reduce bias related to overreliance on standardized metrics; however, additional innovation and research are needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":50929,"journal":{"name":"Academic Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"966-970"},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Academic Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000005708","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/3/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Problem: Holistic review is a multifaceted concept that aims to increase diversity and applicant fit with program needs by complementing traditional academic requirements with appraisal of a wider range of personal characteristics and experiences. Behavioral interviewing has been practiced and studied in human resources, business, and organizational psychology for over 50 years. Its premise is that future performance can be anticipated from past actions. However, many of the interview approaches within the holistic framework are resource intensive and logistically challenging.

Approach: The Vanderbilt University School of Medicine instituted a competency-based behavioral interview (CBBI) to augment the selection process in 2012. Behavioral interviews are based on key competencies needed for entering students and require applicants to reflect on their actual experiences and what they learned from them. The authors reviewed 5 years of experience (2015-2019) to evaluate how CBBI scores contributed to the overall assessment of applicants for admission.

Outcomes: The final admission committee decision for each applicant was determined by reviewing multiple factors, with no single assessment determining the final score. The CBBI and summary interview scores showed a strong association ( P < .005), suggesting that the summary interviewer, who had access to the full applicant file, and the CBBI interviewer, who did not, assessed similar strengths despite the 2 different approaches, or that the strengths assessed tracked in the same direction. Students whose 2 interview scores were not aligned were less likely to be accepted to the school.

Next steps: The review raised awareness about the cultural aspects of interpreting the competencies and the need to expand our cultural framework throughout interviewer training. Findings indicate that CBBIs have the potential to reduce bias related to overreliance on standardized metrics; however, additional innovation and research are needed.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估以能力为基础的行为面试在整体医学院招生中的作用。
问题:全盘审查是一个多层面的概念,旨在通过对申请人更广泛的个人特征和经历的评估来补充传统的学术要求,从而提高多样性和申请人与项目需求的契合度。行为面试在人力资源、商业和组织心理学领域的实践和研究已有 50 多年的历史。其前提是,可以从过去的行为中预测未来的表现。然而,整体框架内的许多面试方法都需要大量资源,在后勤方面也具有挑战性:范德堡大学医学院于 2012 年推出了基于胜任能力的行为面试(CBBI),以加强选拔过程。行为面试以入学学生所需的关键能力为基础,要求申请者反思自己的实际经历以及从中学到的东西。作者回顾了 5 年(2015-2019 年)的经验,以评估 CBBI 分数对入学申请人整体评估的贡献:录取委员会对每位申请人的最终决定是通过审查多种因素确定的,没有任何一项评估能决定最终得分。CBBI 和简易面试分数显示出很强的关联性(P < .005),这表明,尽管简易面试官和 CBBI 面试官采用了不同的方法,但前者可以获得完整的申请人档案,而后者则无法获得完整的申请人档案。两次面试分数不一致的学生被学校录取的可能性较小:此次审查提高了我们对解释能力的文化方面的认识,以及在整个面试官培训过程中扩展我们的文化框架的必要性。研究结果表明,CBBI 有可能减少与过度依赖标准化指标有关的偏差;但是,还需要更多的创新和研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Academic Medicine
Academic Medicine 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
9.50%
发文量
982
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Academic Medicine, the official peer-reviewed journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges, acts as an international forum for exchanging ideas, information, and strategies to address the significant challenges in academic medicine. The journal covers areas such as research, education, clinical care, community collaboration, and leadership, with a commitment to serving the public interest.
期刊最新文献
Validating the 2023 Association of American Medical Colleges Graduate Medical Education Leadership Competencies. World Federation for Medical Education Recognizes 5 International Accrediting Bodies. Irony. Teaching Opportunities for Postgraduate Trainees in Primary Care. How Many Is Too Many? Using Cognitive Load Theory to Determine the Maximum Safe Number of Inpatient Consultations for Trainees.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1