Nadine Wiper-Bergeron, Holly L Adam, Kaylee Eady, Katherine A Moreau, Christopher Rj Kennedy, Claire E Kendall
{"title":"Extending social accountability mandates to biomedical research in Canadian faculties of medicine.","authors":"Nadine Wiper-Bergeron, Holly L Adam, Kaylee Eady, Katherine A Moreau, Christopher Rj Kennedy, Claire E Kendall","doi":"10.36834/cmej.75425","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Social accountability (SA), as defined by Boelen and Heck, is the obligation of medical schools to address the needs of communities through education, research and service activities. While SA is embedded within health profession education frameworks in medicine, they are rarely taught within graduate-level (MSc/PhD) education.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>As these programs train future medical researchers, we invited first-year graduate students enrolled in a mandatory professionalism class at our institution (<i>n</i> = 111) to complete a survey on their perceptions of the importance of SA in their research, training, and future careers.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Over 80% (<i>n</i> = 87) of respondents agreed that SA is relevant and felt committed to integrating it into their future research activities, only a limited number of students felt confident and/or supported in their abilities to integrate SA into their research.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Specific SA training in graduate education is necessary for students to effectively incorporate elements of SA into their research, and as such support the SA mandates of their training institutions. We posit that awareness of SA principles formalizes the professional standards for biomedical researchers and is thus foundational for developing a professionalism curriculum in graduate education programs in medicine. We propose an expansion of the World Health Organization (WHO) <i>partnership pentagon</i> to include partners within the research ecosystem (funding partners, certification bodies) that collaborate with biomedical researchers to make research socially accountable.</p>","PeriodicalId":72503,"journal":{"name":"Canadian medical education journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10961123/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian medical education journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36834/cmej.75425","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/2/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Social accountability (SA), as defined by Boelen and Heck, is the obligation of medical schools to address the needs of communities through education, research and service activities. While SA is embedded within health profession education frameworks in medicine, they are rarely taught within graduate-level (MSc/PhD) education.
Methods: As these programs train future medical researchers, we invited first-year graduate students enrolled in a mandatory professionalism class at our institution (n = 111) to complete a survey on their perceptions of the importance of SA in their research, training, and future careers.
Results: Over 80% (n = 87) of respondents agreed that SA is relevant and felt committed to integrating it into their future research activities, only a limited number of students felt confident and/or supported in their abilities to integrate SA into their research.
Conclusions: Specific SA training in graduate education is necessary for students to effectively incorporate elements of SA into their research, and as such support the SA mandates of their training institutions. We posit that awareness of SA principles formalizes the professional standards for biomedical researchers and is thus foundational for developing a professionalism curriculum in graduate education programs in medicine. We propose an expansion of the World Health Organization (WHO) partnership pentagon to include partners within the research ecosystem (funding partners, certification bodies) that collaborate with biomedical researchers to make research socially accountable.
背景:根据 Boelen 和 Heck 的定义,社会责任(SA)是医学院校通过教育、研究和服务活动满足社区需求的义务。虽然社会责任已被纳入医学健康职业教育框架,但在研究生(理学硕士/博士)教育中却很少讲授:由于这些课程培养的是未来的医学研究人员,因此我们邀请了本校专业必修课的研究生一年级学生(n = 111)完成一项调查,了解他们对 "社会责任 "在其研究、培训和未来职业生涯中的重要性的看法:结果:超过 80% 的受访者(n = 87)认为 SA 具有相关性,并致力于将其融入未来的研究活动中,但只有少数学生对自己将 SA 融入研究的能力感到自信和/或支持:结论:研究生教育中专门的 SA 培训对于学生有效地将 SA 元素纳入其研究工作,从而支持其培训机构的 SA 任务是非常必要的。我们认为,对 SA 原则的认识正式确立了生物医学研究人员的职业标准,因此是在医学研究生教育项目中开发职业精神课程的基础。我们建议扩大世界卫生组织(WHO)合作伙伴五边形的范围,将研究生态系统中与生物医学研究人员合作的合作伙伴(资助合作伙伴、认证机构)纳入其中,使研究工作具有社会责任感。