Proteinase K is not essential for marine eDNA metabarcoding

Q1 Agricultural and Biological Sciences Environmental DNA Pub Date : 2024-03-26 DOI:10.1002/edn3.523
Molly A. Timmers, Katherine Viehl, Cameron Angulo, Mykle L. Hoban, Robert J. Toonen, Cameron A. J. Walsh, Van Wishingrad, Brian W. Bowen
{"title":"Proteinase K is not essential for marine eDNA metabarcoding","authors":"Molly A. Timmers,&nbsp;Katherine Viehl,&nbsp;Cameron Angulo,&nbsp;Mykle L. Hoban,&nbsp;Robert J. Toonen,&nbsp;Cameron A. J. Walsh,&nbsp;Van Wishingrad,&nbsp;Brian W. Bowen","doi":"10.1002/edn3.523","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Proteinase K (ProK) is regarded as an essential ingredient in most DNA extraction protocols for protein-rich sample types such as tissue, blood, and mucus. However, ProK is expensive and may be unnecessary when samples are protein-limited, such as environmental DNA (eDNA) from oligotrophic seawater. To investigate this, we filtered seawater through Sterivex cartridges from a mesocosm receiving input from the adjacent coral reef slope at the Hawai‘i Institute of Marine Biology. We tested whether the addition of varying levels of ProK (0 μL, 25 μL, 50 μL, 100 μL, or 150 μL—20 mg/mL stock concentrations) to 1.8 mL of lysis buffer affected DNA yield and the diversity, community composition, and detection of known organisms within the mesocosm community based on zero-width operational taxonomic units (ZOTUs) obtained from DNA metabarcoding. We found no significant differences in diversity metrics among ProK quantities and dominant ZOTUs were consistent across concentrations. Over 50% of detected ZOTUs were shared among samples and only two ZOTUs were unique to samples of a particular ProK concentration. While the community composition among ProK quantities differed, pairwise community comparisons between quantities were not statistically significant and matched the known species composition of the mesocosm. These results suggest that rare ZOTUs and eDNA patchiness are driving overall community differences as opposed to extraction ingredients. Our data show that ProK is not essential when assessing communities from oligotrophic marine environments using eDNA and that the reduction or elimination of ProK can decrease sample preparation time and costs while maintaining data integrity.</p>","PeriodicalId":52828,"journal":{"name":"Environmental DNA","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/edn3.523","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental DNA","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/edn3.523","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Proteinase K (ProK) is regarded as an essential ingredient in most DNA extraction protocols for protein-rich sample types such as tissue, blood, and mucus. However, ProK is expensive and may be unnecessary when samples are protein-limited, such as environmental DNA (eDNA) from oligotrophic seawater. To investigate this, we filtered seawater through Sterivex cartridges from a mesocosm receiving input from the adjacent coral reef slope at the Hawai‘i Institute of Marine Biology. We tested whether the addition of varying levels of ProK (0 μL, 25 μL, 50 μL, 100 μL, or 150 μL—20 mg/mL stock concentrations) to 1.8 mL of lysis buffer affected DNA yield and the diversity, community composition, and detection of known organisms within the mesocosm community based on zero-width operational taxonomic units (ZOTUs) obtained from DNA metabarcoding. We found no significant differences in diversity metrics among ProK quantities and dominant ZOTUs were consistent across concentrations. Over 50% of detected ZOTUs were shared among samples and only two ZOTUs were unique to samples of a particular ProK concentration. While the community composition among ProK quantities differed, pairwise community comparisons between quantities were not statistically significant and matched the known species composition of the mesocosm. These results suggest that rare ZOTUs and eDNA patchiness are driving overall community differences as opposed to extraction ingredients. Our data show that ProK is not essential when assessing communities from oligotrophic marine environments using eDNA and that the reduction or elimination of ProK can decrease sample preparation time and costs while maintaining data integrity.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
蛋白酶 K 并非海洋 eDNA 代谢编码的必要条件
蛋白酶 K(ProK)被认为是大多数提取组织、血液和粘液等富含蛋白质类型样本的 DNA 方案中必不可少的成分。然而,ProK 价格昂贵,而且在蛋白质含量有限的样本(如来自寡营养海水的环境 DNA (eDNA))中可能不需要 ProK。为了研究这个问题,我们用 Sterivex 滤芯过滤了从夏威夷海洋生物研究所邻近珊瑚礁斜坡输入的中观世界中的海水。我们测试了在 1.8 mL 溶解缓冲液中加入不同浓度的 ProK(0 μL、25 μL、50 μL、100 μL 或 150 μL-20 mg/mL 浓度)是否会影响 DNA 产量、多样性、群落组成以及根据 DNA 代谢编码获得的零宽度可操作分类单位(ZOTUs)对中观生物群落中已知生物的检测。我们发现,不同数量的 ProK 在多样性指标上没有明显差异,不同浓度下的主要 ZOTU 也是一致的。在检测到的 ZOTU 中,50% 以上的 ZOTU 在样本间共享,只有两个 ZOTU 是特定 ProK 浓度的样本所独有的。虽然 ProK 数量之间的群落组成不同,但数量之间的成对群落比较没有统计学意义,而且与中层大气的已知物种组成相吻合。这些结果表明,稀有的 ZOTUs 和 eDNA 斑块是造成整体群落差异的原因,而不是提取成分。我们的数据表明,在使用 eDNA 评估寡营养海洋环境中的群落时,ProK 并非必不可少,减少或取消 ProK 可以减少样品制备时间和成本,同时保持数据的完整性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Environmental DNA
Environmental DNA Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
CiteScore
11.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
99
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Bottom Trawling and Multi-Marker eDNA Metabarcoding Surveys Reveal Highly Diverse Vertebrate and Crustacean Communities: A Case Study in an Urbanized Subtropical Estuary Evaluation of a Nanopore Sequencing Strategy on Bacterial Communities From Marine Sediments Current Trends in Biophysical Modeling of eDNA Dynamics for the Detection of Marine Species Validation of Environmental DNA for Estimating Proportional and Absolute Biomass
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1