Children's moral evaluations of and behaviors toward people who are curious about religion and science

IF 3.8 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL Child development Pub Date : 2024-03-27 DOI:10.1111/cdev.14088
Ariel J. Mosley, Cindel J. M. White, Larisa Heiphetz Solomon
{"title":"Children's moral evaluations of and behaviors toward people who are curious about religion and science","authors":"Ariel J. Mosley,&nbsp;Cindel J. M. White,&nbsp;Larisa Heiphetz Solomon","doi":"10.1111/cdev.14088","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Although children exhibit curiosity regarding science, questions remain regarding how children evaluate others' curiosity and whether evaluations differ across domains that prioritize faith (e.g., religion) versus those that value questioning (e.g., science). In Study 1 (<i>n</i> = 115 5- to 8-year-olds; 49% female; 66% White), children evaluated actors who were curious, ignorant and non-curious, or knowledgeable about religion or science; curiosity elicited relatively favorable moral evaluations (<i>d</i>s &gt; .40). Study 2 (<i>n</i> = 62 7- to 8-year-olds; 48% female; 63% White) found that these evaluations generalized to behaviors, as children acted more pro-socially and less punitively toward curious, versus not curious, individuals (<span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <msubsup>\n <mi>η</mi>\n <mi>p</mi>\n <mn>2</mn>\n </msubsup>\n </mrow>\n </semantics></math> = .37). These findings (data collected 2020–2022) demonstrate children's positive moral evaluations of curiosity and contribute to debates regarding overlap between scientific and religious cognition.</p>","PeriodicalId":10109,"journal":{"name":"Child development","volume":"95 4","pages":"e224-e235"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Child development","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://srcd.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/cdev.14088","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Although children exhibit curiosity regarding science, questions remain regarding how children evaluate others' curiosity and whether evaluations differ across domains that prioritize faith (e.g., religion) versus those that value questioning (e.g., science). In Study 1 (n = 115 5- to 8-year-olds; 49% female; 66% White), children evaluated actors who were curious, ignorant and non-curious, or knowledgeable about religion or science; curiosity elicited relatively favorable moral evaluations (ds > .40). Study 2 (n = 62 7- to 8-year-olds; 48% female; 63% White) found that these evaluations generalized to behaviors, as children acted more pro-socially and less punitively toward curious, versus not curious, individuals ( η p 2  = .37). These findings (data collected 2020–2022) demonstrate children's positive moral evaluations of curiosity and contribute to debates regarding overlap between scientific and religious cognition.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
儿童对宗教和科学好奇者的道德评价和行为。
尽管儿童对科学表现出好奇心,但对于儿童如何评价他人的好奇心,以及在以信仰为优先的领域(如宗教)和以质疑为优先的领域(如科学)中,评价是否有所不同,仍然存在疑问。在研究 1(n = 115 名 5 至 8 岁儿童;49% 为女性;66% 为白人)中,儿童对宗教或科学方面好奇、无知、不好奇或有知识的行为者进行了评价;好奇心引起了相对有利的道德评价(ds > .40)。研究 2(n = 62 名 7 至 8 岁儿童;48% 为女性;63% 为白人)发现,这些评价会扩展到行为上,因为儿童对好奇心强的人和不好奇的人表现出更多的社会支持和更少的惩罚(η p 2 $$ {eta}_\mathrm{p}}^2 $$ = .37)。这些发现(数据收集于2020-2022年)表明儿童对好奇心有着积极的道德评价,并有助于有关科学认知与宗教认知重叠的辩论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Child development
Child development Multiple-
CiteScore
9.20
自引率
4.30%
发文量
149
期刊介绍: As the flagship journal of the Society for Research in Child Development (SRCD), Child Development has published articles, essays, reviews, and tutorials on various topics in the field of child development since 1930. Spanning many disciplines, the journal provides the latest research, not only for researchers and theoreticians, but also for child psychiatrists, clinical psychologists, psychiatric social workers, specialists in early childhood education, educational psychologists, special education teachers, and other researchers. In addition to six issues per year of Child Development, subscribers to the journal also receive a full subscription to Child Development Perspectives and Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development.
期刊最新文献
Labeling it makes you feel better: The role of affect labeling on emotion regulation among Chinese preschoolers. Social mobility and parenting: Testing associations in a prospective longitudinal cohort study. Everyday maternal sensitivity to distress is dynamic and systematically varies across contexts. The explorer's edge: Racial-ethnic identity exploration confers early adolescents of color with protection against racial-ethnic discrimination in a co-sibling control study. Children's evaluations of teacher racial preferences in the classroom.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1