Machine Learning Identifies Higher Survival Profile In Extracorporeal Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation.

IF 7.7 1区 医学 Q1 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE Critical Care Medicine Pub Date : 2024-07-01 Epub Date: 2024-03-27 DOI:10.1097/CCM.0000000000006261
Ruben Crespo-Diaz, Julian Wolfson, Demetris Yannopoulos, Jason A Bartos
{"title":"Machine Learning Identifies Higher Survival Profile In Extracorporeal Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation.","authors":"Ruben Crespo-Diaz, Julian Wolfson, Demetris Yannopoulos, Jason A Bartos","doi":"10.1097/CCM.0000000000006261","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) has been shown to improve neurologically favorable survival in patients with refractory out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) caused by shockable rhythms. Further refinement of patient selection is needed to focus this resource-intensive therapy on those patients likely to benefit. This study sought to create a selection model using machine learning (ML) tools for refractory cardiac arrest patients undergoing ECPR.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Retrospective cohort study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Cardiac ICU in a Quaternary Care Center.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>Adults 18-75 years old with refractory OHCA caused by a shockable rhythm.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Three hundred seventy-six consecutive patients with refractory OHCA and a shockable presenting rhythm were analyzed, of which 301 underwent ECPR and cannulation for venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Clinical variables that were widely available at the time of cannulation were analyzed and ranked on their ability to predict neurologically favorable survival.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>ML was used to train supervised models and predict favorable neurologic outcomes of ECPR. The best-performing models were internally validated using a holdout test set.</p><p><strong>Measurements and main results: </strong>Neurologically favorable survival occurred in 119 of 301 patients (40%) receiving ECPR. Rhythm at the time of cannulation, intermittent or sustained return of spontaneous circulation, arrest to extracorporeal membrane oxygenation perfusion time, and lactic acid levels were the most predictive of the 11 variables analyzed. All variables were integrated into a training model that yielded an in-sample area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.89 and a misclassification rate of 0.19. Out-of-sample validation of the model yielded an AUC of 0.80 and a misclassification rate of 0.23, demonstrating acceptable prediction ability.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>ML can develop a tiered risk model to guide ECPR patient selection with tailored arrest profiles.</p>","PeriodicalId":10765,"journal":{"name":"Critical Care Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":7.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11166735/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical Care Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/CCM.0000000000006261","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/3/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) has been shown to improve neurologically favorable survival in patients with refractory out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) caused by shockable rhythms. Further refinement of patient selection is needed to focus this resource-intensive therapy on those patients likely to benefit. This study sought to create a selection model using machine learning (ML) tools for refractory cardiac arrest patients undergoing ECPR.

Design: Retrospective cohort study.

Setting: Cardiac ICU in a Quaternary Care Center.

Patients: Adults 18-75 years old with refractory OHCA caused by a shockable rhythm.

Methods: Three hundred seventy-six consecutive patients with refractory OHCA and a shockable presenting rhythm were analyzed, of which 301 underwent ECPR and cannulation for venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Clinical variables that were widely available at the time of cannulation were analyzed and ranked on their ability to predict neurologically favorable survival.

Interventions: ML was used to train supervised models and predict favorable neurologic outcomes of ECPR. The best-performing models were internally validated using a holdout test set.

Measurements and main results: Neurologically favorable survival occurred in 119 of 301 patients (40%) receiving ECPR. Rhythm at the time of cannulation, intermittent or sustained return of spontaneous circulation, arrest to extracorporeal membrane oxygenation perfusion time, and lactic acid levels were the most predictive of the 11 variables analyzed. All variables were integrated into a training model that yielded an in-sample area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.89 and a misclassification rate of 0.19. Out-of-sample validation of the model yielded an AUC of 0.80 and a misclassification rate of 0.23, demonstrating acceptable prediction ability.

Conclusions: ML can develop a tiered risk model to guide ECPR patient selection with tailored arrest profiles.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
机器学习识别体外心肺复苏术中的高存活率特征
目的:体外心肺复苏(ECPR)已被证明可以提高因可电击节律导致的难治性院外心脏骤停(OHCA)患者的神经存活率。需要进一步完善患者选择,以便将这种资源密集型疗法集中用于可能受益的患者。本研究试图利用机器学习(ML)工具为接受 ECPR 的难治性心脏骤停患者建立一个选择模型:设计:回顾性队列研究:患者:18-75 岁的成年人:患者:18-75 岁、因可电击心律导致难治性 OHCA 的成人:分析了连续376例难治性OHCA和可电击心律的患者,其中301例接受了ECPR和静脉体外膜肺氧合插管。对插管时可广泛获得的临床变量进行了分析,并对其预测神经系统存活率的能力进行了排序:干预措施:使用 ML 训练监督模型,预测 ECPR 有利的神经功能结果。测量和主要结果:在接受 ECPR 的 301 名患者中,119 名(40%)患者的神经系统存活率良好。在分析的 11 个变量中,插管时的节律、间歇性或持续性自主循环恢复、停搏到体外膜肺氧合灌注时间和乳酸水平最具预测性。所有变量都被整合到一个训练模型中,该模型的样本内接收者工作特征曲线下面积(AUC)为 0.89,误分类率为 0.19。对模型进行样本外验证后,AUC 为 0.80,误分类率为 0.23,显示了可接受的预测能力:结论:ML 可以建立一个分级风险模型,以指导 ECPR 患者的选择,并提供量身定制的骤停特征。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Critical Care Medicine
Critical Care Medicine 医学-危重病医学
CiteScore
16.30
自引率
5.70%
发文量
728
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Critical Care Medicine is the premier peer-reviewed, scientific publication in critical care medicine. Directed to those specialists who treat patients in the ICU and CCU, including chest physicians, surgeons, pediatricians, pharmacists/pharmacologists, anesthesiologists, critical care nurses, and other healthcare professionals, Critical Care Medicine covers all aspects of acute and emergency care for the critically ill or injured patient. Each issue presents critical care practitioners with clinical breakthroughs that lead to better patient care, the latest news on promising research, and advances in equipment and techniques.
期刊最新文献
Time Controlled Adaptive Ventilation/Airway Pressure Release Ventilation Can be Used Effectively in Patients With or at High Risk of Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome "Time is the Soul of the World" Pythagoras. Caution-Do Not Attempt This at Home. Airway Pressure Release Ventilation Should Not Routinely Be Used in Patients With or at Risk of Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Outside of a Clinical Trial. Resuscitation for Donation After Brain Death: Respecting Autonomy and Maximizing Utility. Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation for Organ Preservation After Death Risks Public Trust and Requires Explicit Consent. Two Weeks Versus One Week of Maximal Patient-Intensivist Continuity for Adult Medical Intensive Care Patients: A Two-Center Target Trial Emulation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1