Pelvic exenteration: a retrospective study in a tertiary referral cancer center in the UK.

IF 1.6 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Minerva obstetrics and gynecology Pub Date : 2024-03-27 DOI:10.23736/S2724-606X.24.05337-5
Konstantinos Palaiologos, Rebecca Karkia, Zoi Nikoloudaki, Ahmed Mohamed, Rebecca Lavelle, Susanne Booth, Marina Flynn, Christopher Helbren, Matthew Simms, Theo Giannopoulos
{"title":"Pelvic exenteration: a retrospective study in a tertiary referral cancer center in the UK.","authors":"Konstantinos Palaiologos, Rebecca Karkia, Zoi Nikoloudaki, Ahmed Mohamed, Rebecca Lavelle, Susanne Booth, Marina Flynn, Christopher Helbren, Matthew Simms, Theo Giannopoulos","doi":"10.23736/S2724-606X.24.05337-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Pelvic exenteration (PE) is an extensive surgery that is indicated in cases of recurrent advanced gynecological cancer with curative and sometimes palliative intent. The procedure is associated with both high morbidity and mortality and as such is considered a highly specialist procedure. The aim of the study was to analyze surgical outcomes in women who underwent PE for advanced gynecological malignancy in a tertiary cancer referral center over 11 years.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is an observational retrospective single-center study. There were 17 patients included who underwent PE in Hull Royal Infirmary Hospital (Hull, UK) between 2010 and 2021. The main outcome measures were the perioperative complications, overall survival (OS), and recurrence free survival (RFS). Cumulative survival rates were reported at 1, 3 and 5 years. Univariate Cox regression analysis was undertaken to analyze factors that are prognostic for OS and RFS. Hazard Ratios (HR) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were computed from the results of the Cox regression analyses. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were generated to visually display estimates of OS and RFS over the follow-up period.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The median age at the time of surgery was 63.0 (IQR: 48.0-71.0). All patients received surgery with curative intent and complete tumor resection (R0) was achieved in 94.1% of cases. An overall 5-year survival was achieved in 63.7% of patients. Mean overall survival (OS) was 8.4 years (95% CI: 7.78-9.02). The RFS was 5.0 years (95% CI: 4.13-5.87). Both OS and RFS were significantly negatively affected by the hospital stay (P=0.020 and P=0.035, respectively), but not by the type of surgery (P=0.263 and P=0.826, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The results of the study demonstrated stable and comparable outcomes in patients undergoing pelvic exenteration.</p>","PeriodicalId":18572,"journal":{"name":"Minerva obstetrics and gynecology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Minerva obstetrics and gynecology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23736/S2724-606X.24.05337-5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Pelvic exenteration (PE) is an extensive surgery that is indicated in cases of recurrent advanced gynecological cancer with curative and sometimes palliative intent. The procedure is associated with both high morbidity and mortality and as such is considered a highly specialist procedure. The aim of the study was to analyze surgical outcomes in women who underwent PE for advanced gynecological malignancy in a tertiary cancer referral center over 11 years.

Methods: This is an observational retrospective single-center study. There were 17 patients included who underwent PE in Hull Royal Infirmary Hospital (Hull, UK) between 2010 and 2021. The main outcome measures were the perioperative complications, overall survival (OS), and recurrence free survival (RFS). Cumulative survival rates were reported at 1, 3 and 5 years. Univariate Cox regression analysis was undertaken to analyze factors that are prognostic for OS and RFS. Hazard Ratios (HR) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were computed from the results of the Cox regression analyses. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were generated to visually display estimates of OS and RFS over the follow-up period.

Results: The median age at the time of surgery was 63.0 (IQR: 48.0-71.0). All patients received surgery with curative intent and complete tumor resection (R0) was achieved in 94.1% of cases. An overall 5-year survival was achieved in 63.7% of patients. Mean overall survival (OS) was 8.4 years (95% CI: 7.78-9.02). The RFS was 5.0 years (95% CI: 4.13-5.87). Both OS and RFS were significantly negatively affected by the hospital stay (P=0.020 and P=0.035, respectively), but not by the type of surgery (P=0.263 and P=0.826, respectively).

Conclusions: The results of the study demonstrated stable and comparable outcomes in patients undergoing pelvic exenteration.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
盆腔外扩张术:英国一家三级癌症转诊中心的回顾性研究。
背景:盆腔外扩张术(PE)是一种广泛的手术,适用于复发性晚期妇科癌症,具有治愈性,有时也有姑息性。该手术与高发病率和高死亡率相关,因此被认为是一种高度专业的手术。本研究旨在分析一家三级癌症转诊中心 11 年来接受晚期妇科恶性肿瘤 PE 的妇女的手术结果:这是一项观察性回顾性单中心研究。方法:这是一项观察性回顾性单中心研究,共纳入了 2010 年至 2021 年期间在赫尔皇家医院(英国赫尔市)接受 PE 治疗的 17 名患者。主要结果指标为围术期并发症、总生存率(OS)和无复发生存率(RFS)。报告了1年、3年和5年的累积生存率。采用单变量 Cox 回归分析来分析 OS 和 RFS 的预后因素。根据考克斯回归分析的结果计算出危险比(HR)和 95% 置信区间(95% CI)。生成卡普兰-梅耶生存曲线,直观显示随访期间OS和RFS的估计值:手术时的中位年龄为 63.0(IQR:48.0-71.0)。所有患者均接受了根治性手术,94.1%的病例实现了肿瘤完全切除(R0)。63.7%的患者获得了5年总生存期。平均总生存期(OS)为8.4年(95% CI:7.78-9.02)。RFS为5.0年(95% CI:4.13-5.87)。OS和RFS均受到住院时间的明显负面影响(分别为P=0.020和P=0.035),但不受手术类型的影响(分别为P=0.263和P=0.826):研究结果表明,接受骨盆外展术的患者的预后稳定且具有可比性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Minerva obstetrics and gynecology
Minerva obstetrics and gynecology OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY-
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
11.10%
发文量
191
期刊最新文献
Use of the Knutson's paste for the treatment of perineal wound dehiscence after vaginal delivery: a single-center clinical experience. Endometriosis and risk factors in pregnancy, labor and delivery: a case-control study. Recipients' age, fresh embryo and blastocyst-stage embryo transfer as favorable factors in a transnational oocyte donation program. The role of colposcopy in HPV vaccination era. The predictive role of uterocervical angle in labor outcomes: a narrative review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1