Scleral Fixated Secondary IOLs: An Outcomes Comparison Between the Yamane and Gore-Tex-Sutured Techniques.

IF 0.9 4区 医学 Q4 OPHTHALMOLOGY Ophthalmic surgery, lasers & imaging retina Pub Date : 2024-07-01 Epub Date: 2024-03-01 DOI:10.3928/23258160-20240226-01
Sean C Drummond, Jack E Feist, Jason N Crosson, Asghar A Haider, Jonathan S Fuerst, Devon Askins Hughes, Richard M Feist
{"title":"Scleral Fixated Secondary IOLs: An Outcomes Comparison Between the Yamane and Gore-Tex-Sutured Techniques.","authors":"Sean C Drummond, Jack E Feist, Jason N Crosson, Asghar A Haider, Jonathan S Fuerst, Devon Askins Hughes, Richard M Feist","doi":"10.3928/23258160-20240226-01","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objective: </strong>Among secondary intraocular lens (IOL) techniques, scleral fixated IOLs (SFIOLs) offer advantages in cases without capsular support. In this article, we compare outcomes between two types of Gore-Tex scleral sutured IOLs with the Yamane technique.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>This study was a retrospective chart review of patients who underwent SFIOL implantation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Analysis revealed a statistically significant improvement in final postoperative visual acuity (VA) for sutured SFIOLs (<i>P</i> < 0.001, Envista (<i>n</i> = 29) 95% CI 0.47 to 1.04, Akreos (<i>n</i> = 23) 95% CI 0.32 to 0.81) with no statistical improvement in the Yamane group (<i>P</i> = 0.44, <i>n</i> = 15, 95% CI -0.33 to 0.71). Outcomes analysis revealed greater incidences of cystoid macular edema (CME) in the Yamane cohort (<i>P</i> < 0.05) and a higher rate of reoperations in the Akreos cohort (<i>P</i> < 0.02). All complications related to suture material (<i>n</i> = 4) and IOL decentration (<i>n</i> = 2) occurred in the sutured SFIOL group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The sutureless Yamane technique offered fewer subsequent surgeries and suture-specific complications while revealing diminished VA improvement in long-term follow-up compared to the sutured SFIOLs. <b>[<i>Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Retina</i> 2024;55:384-390.]</b>.</p>","PeriodicalId":19679,"journal":{"name":"Ophthalmic surgery, lasers & imaging retina","volume":" ","pages":"384-390"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ophthalmic surgery, lasers & imaging retina","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3928/23258160-20240226-01","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/3/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objective: Among secondary intraocular lens (IOL) techniques, scleral fixated IOLs (SFIOLs) offer advantages in cases without capsular support. In this article, we compare outcomes between two types of Gore-Tex scleral sutured IOLs with the Yamane technique.

Patients and methods: This study was a retrospective chart review of patients who underwent SFIOL implantation.

Results: Analysis revealed a statistically significant improvement in final postoperative visual acuity (VA) for sutured SFIOLs (P < 0.001, Envista (n = 29) 95% CI 0.47 to 1.04, Akreos (n = 23) 95% CI 0.32 to 0.81) with no statistical improvement in the Yamane group (P = 0.44, n = 15, 95% CI -0.33 to 0.71). Outcomes analysis revealed greater incidences of cystoid macular edema (CME) in the Yamane cohort (P < 0.05) and a higher rate of reoperations in the Akreos cohort (P < 0.02). All complications related to suture material (n = 4) and IOL decentration (n = 2) occurred in the sutured SFIOL group.

Conclusions: The sutureless Yamane technique offered fewer subsequent surgeries and suture-specific complications while revealing diminished VA improvement in long-term follow-up compared to the sutured SFIOLs. [Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Retina 2024;55:384-390.].

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
巩膜固定二次人工晶体:Yamane 和 Gore-Tex 缝合技术的效果比较。
背景和目的:在二次人工晶体(IOL)技术中,巩膜固定人工晶体(SFIOL)在无囊膜支持的情况下具有优势。本文比较了两种类型的 Gore-Tex 巩膜缝合人工晶体与 Yamane 技术的效果:本研究对接受 SFIOL 植入术的患者进行了回顾性病历审查:分析显示,缝合SFIOLs的术后最终视力(VA)有统计学意义的改善(P < 0.001,Envista(n = 29)95% CI 0.47-1.04,Akreos(n = 23)95% CI 0.32-0.81),而Yamane组无统计学意义的改善(P = 0.44,n = 15,95% CI -0.33-0.71)。结果分析显示,Yamane组的囊样黄斑水肿(CME)发生率更高(P < 0.05),而Akreos组的再手术率更高(P < 0.02)。所有与缝合材料(4 例)和人工晶体脱位(2 例)相关的并发症均发生在缝合 SFIOL 组:结论:与缝合SFIOLs相比,Yamane无缝合技术减少了后续手术和缝合特异性并发症,但在长期随访中VA改善程度有所下降。[眼科手术激光成像视网膜2024;55:xx-xx]。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
89
期刊介绍: OSLI Retina focuses exclusively on retinal diseases, surgery and pharmacotherapy. OSLI Retina will offer an expedited submission to publication effort of peer-reviewed clinical science and case report articles. The front of the journal offers practical clinical and practice management features and columns specific to retina specialists. In sum, readers will find important peer-reviewed retina articles and the latest findings in techniques and science, as well as informative business and practice management features in one journal.
期刊最新文献
Outer Retinal Tubulation and Vision in Geographic Atrophy: A Natural History Analysis From the Phase 3 OAKS and DERBY Trials. A Cross-Sectional Survey of Optometrists in Canada Regarding Referral Patterns and a Needs Assessment for an Artificial Intelligence Referral Screening Tool for Epiretinal Membrane. Favorable Outcome After Pegcetacoplan (Syfovre)-Associated Occlusive Retinal Vasculitis. Free and Movil Primary Cyst of the Iris Pigment Epithelium. Photodynamic Therapy for Subretinal Fluid Associated With Choroidal Nevus.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1