US wool industry perceptions of digital record keeping and wool supply-chain traceability

IF 1.4 Q3 AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE Applied Animal Science Pub Date : 2024-03-27 DOI:10.15232/aas.2023-02496
C.E. Newman , C.L. Gifford , D.P. Anderson , J.D. Scasta , W.C. Stewart
{"title":"US wool industry perceptions of digital record keeping and wool supply-chain traceability","authors":"C.E. Newman ,&nbsp;C.L. Gifford ,&nbsp;D.P. Anderson ,&nbsp;J.D. Scasta ,&nbsp;W.C. Stewart","doi":"10.15232/aas.2023-02496","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>The objectives of this research were to assess the awareness and perceptions of technology currently available to the US sheep industry, to determine how each industry segment prioritizes data records, to understand what level of premiums are needed and realistic, and to assess changes by industry segment and operation size.</p></div><div><h3>Materials and Methods</h3><p>An online survey was distributed at the 2022 American Sheep Industry Association (ASI) Convention and through the University of Wyoming Sheep Extension and ASI Emerging Entrepreneurs social media pages. Respondents were asked demographic questions and specific segment questions that assessed knowledge of blockchain, importance of records, and current adoption of technology. All descriptive and ANOVA analyses used R statistical procedures (R Core Team; version 2023.03.0). Least squares means were calculated, and the glm procedure of R was used to develop a binary logit model to assess statistical probabilities. Significance was considered at α = 0.05.</p></div><div><h3>Results and Discussion</h3><p>A total of 61 responses were acquired (n = 52 producers; n = 9 wool warehousers/ processors), representing operations in 19 US states and Ontario, Canada. Respondents indicated they are somewhat familiar with using blockchain technology for tracking records of importance. Adoption of electronic identification (EID) technology and digital record keeping were significant by operation size, with inflection points for operations with &lt;99 head or &gt;2,000 head (i.e., extremes). A market premium 8.1–12% over base price is needed to submit a raw wool core test into a blockchain-based system, but wool warehousers/processors are willing to pay a premium to have access to the records on a blockchain- based system at 4.1–8% over base price.</p></div><div><h3>Implications and Applications</h3><p>Producers and wool warehousers/processors are somewhat familiar with block-chain technology for tracking records of importance, but producer adoption of the current technologies (e.g., EID, software) is limited. Adoption of current management technologies is influenced by operation size, so further work should be conducted to determine the largest barriers to adoption. Further adoption of the current technologies is needed before blockchain technology can be used to its full potential in the sheep industry.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8519,"journal":{"name":"Applied Animal Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590286524000284/pdf?md5=3d43f919c27e406983403fa3bcabf54a&pid=1-s2.0-S2590286524000284-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Animal Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590286524000284","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

The objectives of this research were to assess the awareness and perceptions of technology currently available to the US sheep industry, to determine how each industry segment prioritizes data records, to understand what level of premiums are needed and realistic, and to assess changes by industry segment and operation size.

Materials and Methods

An online survey was distributed at the 2022 American Sheep Industry Association (ASI) Convention and through the University of Wyoming Sheep Extension and ASI Emerging Entrepreneurs social media pages. Respondents were asked demographic questions and specific segment questions that assessed knowledge of blockchain, importance of records, and current adoption of technology. All descriptive and ANOVA analyses used R statistical procedures (R Core Team; version 2023.03.0). Least squares means were calculated, and the glm procedure of R was used to develop a binary logit model to assess statistical probabilities. Significance was considered at α = 0.05.

Results and Discussion

A total of 61 responses were acquired (n = 52 producers; n = 9 wool warehousers/ processors), representing operations in 19 US states and Ontario, Canada. Respondents indicated they are somewhat familiar with using blockchain technology for tracking records of importance. Adoption of electronic identification (EID) technology and digital record keeping were significant by operation size, with inflection points for operations with <99 head or >2,000 head (i.e., extremes). A market premium 8.1–12% over base price is needed to submit a raw wool core test into a blockchain-based system, but wool warehousers/processors are willing to pay a premium to have access to the records on a blockchain- based system at 4.1–8% over base price.

Implications and Applications

Producers and wool warehousers/processors are somewhat familiar with block-chain technology for tracking records of importance, but producer adoption of the current technologies (e.g., EID, software) is limited. Adoption of current management technologies is influenced by operation size, so further work should be conducted to determine the largest barriers to adoption. Further adoption of the current technologies is needed before blockchain technology can be used to its full potential in the sheep industry.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
美国羊毛产业对数字记录保存和羊毛供应链可追溯性的看法
材料和方法在 2022 年美国绵羊产业协会(ASI)大会上,并通过怀俄明大学绵羊推广中心和 ASI 新兴企业家社交媒体页面发布了一份在线调查。受访者被问及人口统计学问题以及评估区块链知识、记录重要性和当前技术采用情况的特定细分问题。所有描述性分析和方差分析均使用 R 统计程序(R 核心团队;版本 2023.03.0)。计算最小二乘法均值,并使用 R 的 glm 程序开发二元对数模型,以评估统计概率。结果与讨论共收到 61 份回复(n = 52 个生产商;n = 9 个羊毛仓储商/加工商),代表了美国 19 个州和加拿大安大略省的运营情况。受访者表示,他们对使用区块链技术追踪重要记录有些了解。电子身份识别(EID)技术和数字记录保存的采用因经营规模而异,拐点出现在拥有 99 头或 2000 头(即极端)的经营场所。向基于区块链的系统提交原毛芯测试需要支付比基准价格高出 8.1-12% 的市场溢价,但羊毛仓储商/加工商愿意支付比基准价格高出 4.1-8% 的溢价来访问基于区块链的系统中的记录。当前管理技术的采用受经营规模的影响,因此应进一步开展工作,确定采用技术的最大障碍。在区块链技术在养羊业充分发挥其潜力之前,需要进一步采用当前的技术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Applied Animal Science
Applied Animal Science AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE-
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
6.70%
发文量
68
期刊最新文献
Table of Contents Editorial Board Call for Submissions Fabrication yields and allometric growth coefficients of carcass components of serially slaughtered implanted or non-implanted beef steers Comparison of a single extended-release implant and a re-implant strategy on performance and carcass characteristics of beef finishing heifers
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1