Meta-analytic validity of cognitive ability for hands-on military job proficiency

IF 3.3 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Intelligence Pub Date : 2024-03-27 DOI:10.1016/j.intell.2024.101818
Jeffrey M. Cucina , Scott K. Burtnick , Maria E. De la Flor Musso , Philip T. Walmsley , Kimberly J. Wilson
{"title":"Meta-analytic validity of cognitive ability for hands-on military job proficiency","authors":"Jeffrey M. Cucina ,&nbsp;Scott K. Burtnick ,&nbsp;Maria E. De la Flor Musso ,&nbsp;Philip T. Walmsley ,&nbsp;Kimberly J. Wilson","doi":"10.1016/j.intell.2024.101818","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>A meta-analysis of the criterion-related validity of U.S. military enlistment cognitive ability tests was conducted using hands-on performance tests (HOPTs) as the criterion. In a HOPT, incumbents perform a representative sample of the tasks for a position and are evaluated by trained raters. We found operational validities in the .40s to .50s. Our meta-analytic database allowed us to investigate concerns regarding overcorrections (via use of multivariate corrections with credible applicant covariances) and provides a direct measure of job proficiency.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":13862,"journal":{"name":"Intelligence","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Intelligence","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160289624000126","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A meta-analysis of the criterion-related validity of U.S. military enlistment cognitive ability tests was conducted using hands-on performance tests (HOPTs) as the criterion. In a HOPT, incumbents perform a representative sample of the tasks for a position and are evaluated by trained raters. We found operational validities in the .40s to .50s. Our meta-analytic database allowed us to investigate concerns regarding overcorrections (via use of multivariate corrections with credible applicant covariances) and provides a direct measure of job proficiency.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
认知能力对实践性军事工作熟练程度的元分析有效性
以实际操作能力测试(HOPT)为标准,对美国军队征兵认知能力测试的标准相关效度进行了荟萃分析。在 HOPT 中,应征者要完成一个职位的代表性任务样本,并由训练有素的评分者进行评估。我们发现操作有效性在 0.40 到 0.50 之间。我们的元分析数据库使我们能够调查有关过度校正的问题(通过使用可信的申请人协方差进行多元校正),并提供了工作熟练程度的直接测量方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Intelligence
Intelligence PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
13.30%
发文量
64
审稿时长
69 days
期刊介绍: This unique journal in psychology is devoted to publishing original research and theoretical studies and review papers that substantially contribute to the understanding of intelligence. It provides a new source of significant papers in psychometrics, tests and measurement, and all other empirical and theoretical studies in intelligence and mental retardation.
期刊最新文献
Ecological cognitive assessment has incremental validity for predicting academic performance over and above single occasion cognitive assessments The threshold for teratogenic effects on child intelligence of prenatal exposure to phenylalanine g: Formative, reflective, or both? Inconsistent Flynn effect patterns may be due to a decreasing positive manifold: Cohort-based measurement-invariant IQ test score changes from 2005 to 2024 Sex differences of school grades in childhood and adolescence: A longitudinal analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1