Slow and steady? Capacity building for participatory governance in local arts development through practitioner-researcher collaboration

Q1 Social Sciences City, Culture and Society Pub Date : 2024-03-27 DOI:10.1016/j.ccs.2024.100578
Victoria Durrer , Máire Davey
{"title":"Slow and steady? Capacity building for participatory governance in local arts development through practitioner-researcher collaboration","authors":"Victoria Durrer ,&nbsp;Máire Davey","doi":"10.1016/j.ccs.2024.100578","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>With a focus on local government's role in participatory cultural governance, this paper argues two points. First, self- and critical reflexivity of institutional brokers is important to community-wide capacity building for participatory cultural governance. Second, this reflexivity can be enabled through slow, inquiry-based collaboration between practitioners and researchers. The paper presents the experiences of a practitioner-researcher collaboration between a local authority arts officer and a cultural policy scholar in the development of a place-based local arts development programme taking place from 2017 to 2019 in Dublin, Ireland. The paper surfaces how efforts to promote greater participation in local decision-making require acts of reflexivity as core to the repertoire of capacity building for enabling participatory cultural governance practice in local public arts administration. Three interrelated factors are determined to have helped enable this reflexivity: (1) the arts officer's openness to engage in collaborative processes that (2) emphasised reflection and learning and were supported by (3) the presence of an embedded researcher with mutual interest, beliefs and experience or knowledge of the institutional context. Limitations in the study highlight areas for further research regarding the affective nature of practitioner-researcher collaborations and the potential of promoting reflexive practice in processes aimed at promoting participatory governance.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":39061,"journal":{"name":"City, Culture and Society","volume":"37 ","pages":"Article 100578"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"City, Culture and Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877916624000134","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

With a focus on local government's role in participatory cultural governance, this paper argues two points. First, self- and critical reflexivity of institutional brokers is important to community-wide capacity building for participatory cultural governance. Second, this reflexivity can be enabled through slow, inquiry-based collaboration between practitioners and researchers. The paper presents the experiences of a practitioner-researcher collaboration between a local authority arts officer and a cultural policy scholar in the development of a place-based local arts development programme taking place from 2017 to 2019 in Dublin, Ireland. The paper surfaces how efforts to promote greater participation in local decision-making require acts of reflexivity as core to the repertoire of capacity building for enabling participatory cultural governance practice in local public arts administration. Three interrelated factors are determined to have helped enable this reflexivity: (1) the arts officer's openness to engage in collaborative processes that (2) emphasised reflection and learning and were supported by (3) the presence of an embedded researcher with mutual interest, beliefs and experience or knowledge of the institutional context. Limitations in the study highlight areas for further research regarding the affective nature of practitioner-researcher collaborations and the potential of promoting reflexive practice in processes aimed at promoting participatory governance.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
缓慢而稳定?通过实践者与研究者的合作,提高地方艺术发展中的参与式管理能力
本文以地方政府在参与式文化治理中的作用为重点,论证了两点。首先,机构经纪人的自我反思和批判性反思对于整个社区的参与式文化治理能力建设非常重要。其次,这种反思性可以通过实践者和研究者之间以探究为基础的缓慢合作来实现。本文介绍了一名地方当局艺术官员与一名文化政策学者在制定基于地方的地方艺术发展计划(2017-2019 年在爱尔兰都柏林实施)过程中开展实践者与研究者合作的经验。论文探讨了促进更多参与地方决策的工作如何需要反思行为,并将其作为地方公共艺术管理中促进参与性文化治理实践的能力建设的核心内容。有三个相互关联的因素被确定为有助于实现这种反思性:(1) 艺术官员对参与合作过程持开放态度,(2) 强调反思和学习,并得到(3) 具有共同利益、信念和经验或机构背景知识的嵌入式研究人员的支持。本研究的局限性突出了需要进一步研究的领域,即从业人员与研究人员合作的情感性质,以及在旨在促进参与式管理的过程中促进反思性实践的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
City, Culture and Society
City, Culture and Society Economics, Econometrics and Finance-Economics, Econometrics and Finance (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
26
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board The public library building as nexus for social interactions: Cases from Helsinki Urban religion and gendered bodies Decoding urban power: Architecture, symbolism and territorial control in Caracas Analysis of contextual factors influencing the development of unplanned settlements: The case of Herat City, Afghanistan
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1