IVF outcomes pre- and post-anti-COVID-19 vaccination – Are there any differences?

IF 4.6 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS ACS Applied Bio Materials Pub Date : 2024-03-27 DOI:10.1016/j.repbio.2024.100879
Marina Arselia Fradkin , Heli Alexandroni , Talia Eldar-Geva , Ido Ben-Ami
{"title":"IVF outcomes pre- and post-anti-COVID-19 vaccination – Are there any differences?","authors":"Marina Arselia Fradkin ,&nbsp;Heli Alexandroni ,&nbsp;Talia Eldar-Geva ,&nbsp;Ido Ben-Ami","doi":"10.1016/j.repbio.2024.100879","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Since the beginning of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, there have been rising concerns about the virus's possible ability to affect male and female fertility. Although effective vaccines were introduced and the vaccination rate of the general population is high, some reproductive-age individuals are still hesitant to receive the vaccine, because of an unestablished belief that the vaccine might impair fertility. In this single-center retrospective study, encompassing data from 387 medical files of in-vitro fertilization (IVF) patients we compared IVF cycle outcomes and sperm characteristics in vaccinated couples before and after vaccination, as well as between vaccinated patients and a control group of individuals who were neither vaccinated nor infected with COVID-19 before or during the cycles. We found no significant differences between vaccinated and non-vaccinated patients concerning the number of retrieved oocytes and the total motile sperm count (TMC). The mean number of retrieved oocytes showed a slight increase in the vaccinated group compared to the non-vaccinated control group (10.8 vs. 9.18, p = 0.14). Additionally, within the vaccinated group, no significant difference was observed in the mean number of oocytes before and after vaccination (9.7 and 10.8, p = 0.14). Other similar cycle outcomes between the groups were the rates of implantation, pregnancy, and ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome. This study emphasized that the mRNA anti-COVID-19 vaccination doesn’t adversely affect ovarian response or sperm quality in IVF patients. These findings contribute valuable insights to the safety profile of anti-COVID-19 vaccines in the context of reproductive-aged populations, aiding decision-making during ongoing virus outbreaks and potential future scenarios.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1642431X24000251","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Since the beginning of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, there have been rising concerns about the virus's possible ability to affect male and female fertility. Although effective vaccines were introduced and the vaccination rate of the general population is high, some reproductive-age individuals are still hesitant to receive the vaccine, because of an unestablished belief that the vaccine might impair fertility. In this single-center retrospective study, encompassing data from 387 medical files of in-vitro fertilization (IVF) patients we compared IVF cycle outcomes and sperm characteristics in vaccinated couples before and after vaccination, as well as between vaccinated patients and a control group of individuals who were neither vaccinated nor infected with COVID-19 before or during the cycles. We found no significant differences between vaccinated and non-vaccinated patients concerning the number of retrieved oocytes and the total motile sperm count (TMC). The mean number of retrieved oocytes showed a slight increase in the vaccinated group compared to the non-vaccinated control group (10.8 vs. 9.18, p = 0.14). Additionally, within the vaccinated group, no significant difference was observed in the mean number of oocytes before and after vaccination (9.7 and 10.8, p = 0.14). Other similar cycle outcomes between the groups were the rates of implantation, pregnancy, and ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome. This study emphasized that the mRNA anti-COVID-19 vaccination doesn’t adversely affect ovarian response or sperm quality in IVF patients. These findings contribute valuable insights to the safety profile of anti-COVID-19 vaccines in the context of reproductive-aged populations, aiding decision-making during ongoing virus outbreaks and potential future scenarios.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
接种抗-COVID-19 疫苗前后的试管婴儿结果--是否存在差异?
自 SARS-CoV-2 大流行以来,人们越来越担心该病毒可能会影响男性和女性的生育能力。虽然有效的疫苗已经问世,普通人群的疫苗接种率也很高,但一些育龄人群仍对接种疫苗犹豫不决,因为他们认为疫苗可能会影响生育能力。在这项单中心回顾性研究中,我们比较了接种疫苗前后接种疫苗夫妇的试管受精周期结果和精子特征,以及接种疫苗患者和对照组(既未接种疫苗,也未在接种前或接种期间感染 COVID-19)之间的差异。我们发现,接种疫苗和未接种疫苗的患者在取回的卵母细胞数和总活动精子数(TMC)方面没有明显差异。与未接种疫苗的对照组相比,接种疫苗组获得的卵母细胞平均数量略有增加(10.8 对 9.18,P = 0.14)。此外,在接种疫苗组中,接种疫苗前后的平均卵母细胞数没有明显差异(9.7 和 10.8,p = 0.14)。两组之间其他相似的周期结果包括植入率、妊娠率和卵巢过度刺激综合征。这项研究强调,mRNA抗COVID-19疫苗接种不会对试管婴儿患者的卵巢反应或精子质量产生不利影响。这些研究结果对育龄人群接种抗COVID-19疫苗的安全性提出了宝贵的见解,有助于在病毒爆发期间和未来可能发生的情况下做出决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
ACS Applied Bio Materials
ACS Applied Bio Materials Chemistry-Chemistry (all)
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
2.10%
发文量
464
期刊最新文献
A Systematic Review of Sleep Disturbance in Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension. Advancing Patient Education in Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension: The Promise of Large Language Models. Anti-Myelin-Associated Glycoprotein Neuropathy: Recent Developments. Approach to Managing the Initial Presentation of Multiple Sclerosis: A Worldwide Practice Survey. Association Between LACE+ Index Risk Category and 90-Day Mortality After Stroke.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1