Enhancing soil quality and grain yields through fertilization strategies in integrated crop-livestock system under no-till in Brazilian Cerrado

IF 3.7 2区 农林科学 Q1 ECOLOGY European Journal of Soil Biology Pub Date : 2024-03-27 DOI:10.1016/j.ejsobi.2024.103613
Tatiane Andrea de Camargo , Lucas Aquino Alves , Ieda Carvalho Mendes , Letícia Rosa Gasques , Luis Guilherme Santos de Oliveira , Gabriela Castro Pires , Tanikely Oliveira Almeida , Paulo César de Faccio Carvalho , Edicarlos Damacena de Souza
{"title":"Enhancing soil quality and grain yields through fertilization strategies in integrated crop-livestock system under no-till in Brazilian Cerrado","authors":"Tatiane Andrea de Camargo ,&nbsp;Lucas Aquino Alves ,&nbsp;Ieda Carvalho Mendes ,&nbsp;Letícia Rosa Gasques ,&nbsp;Luis Guilherme Santos de Oliveira ,&nbsp;Gabriela Castro Pires ,&nbsp;Tanikely Oliveira Almeida ,&nbsp;Paulo César de Faccio Carvalho ,&nbsp;Edicarlos Damacena de Souza","doi":"10.1016/j.ejsobi.2024.103613","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The study aimed to evaluate the effects of P and K fertilization strategies with and without N-fertilization on soil quality and crop yields in integrated crop-livestock system (ICLS) in the Brazilian Cerrado. The treatments included various fertilization strategies, such as applying P and K during either the cropping phase (conventional fertilization) or the pasture phase (system fertilization), with or without N-fertilization during the pasture phase. Soil samples were collected two years after the experiment was initiated from the 0–10 cm layer, and soybean yields were determined at the end of the crop cycle. Soil carbon (C) stocks remained largely unaffected by the different fertilization strategies. However, soil nitrogen (N) stocks, as well as C and N within the microbial biomass, were lower when conventional fertilization and 0 kg ha<sup>−1</sup> of N were used in pastures compared to other treatments. Enzyme activity also decreased with conventional fertilization and 0 kg ha<sup>−1</sup> of N in pastures. Scores for <em>Nutrient Cycling</em> and <em>Nutrient Storage</em> were higher with 100 kg ha<sup>−1</sup> compared to 0 kg ha<sup>−1</sup> of N in the case of conventional fertilization, marking an increase of 22% and 18% for <em>Nutrient Cycling</em> and <em>Nutrient Storage</em>, respectively. For soil function associated with <em>Nutrient Supply</em>, there was no difference between the treatments. Within the 0 kg ha<sup>−1</sup> of N group, system fertilization was 12% and 24% higher compared to conventional fertilization. The soil quality index (SQI<sub>FERTBIO</sub>) was higher with 100 kg ha<sup>−1</sup> (0.83) compared to 0 kg ha<sup>−1</sup> of N (0.77), showing an 8% increase. Soybean yield was 3% higher with system fertilization and 7% higher with 100 kg ha<sup>−1</sup> of N, compared to conventional fertilization with 0 kg ha<sup>−1</sup> of N. In conclusion, even in the short term, adopting a system fertilization strategy and applying N-fertilization in pastures benefits soybean yields in ICLS under no-till.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":12057,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Soil Biology","volume":"121 ","pages":"Article 103613"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Soil Biology","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1164556324000190","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The study aimed to evaluate the effects of P and K fertilization strategies with and without N-fertilization on soil quality and crop yields in integrated crop-livestock system (ICLS) in the Brazilian Cerrado. The treatments included various fertilization strategies, such as applying P and K during either the cropping phase (conventional fertilization) or the pasture phase (system fertilization), with or without N-fertilization during the pasture phase. Soil samples were collected two years after the experiment was initiated from the 0–10 cm layer, and soybean yields were determined at the end of the crop cycle. Soil carbon (C) stocks remained largely unaffected by the different fertilization strategies. However, soil nitrogen (N) stocks, as well as C and N within the microbial biomass, were lower when conventional fertilization and 0 kg ha−1 of N were used in pastures compared to other treatments. Enzyme activity also decreased with conventional fertilization and 0 kg ha−1 of N in pastures. Scores for Nutrient Cycling and Nutrient Storage were higher with 100 kg ha−1 compared to 0 kg ha−1 of N in the case of conventional fertilization, marking an increase of 22% and 18% for Nutrient Cycling and Nutrient Storage, respectively. For soil function associated with Nutrient Supply, there was no difference between the treatments. Within the 0 kg ha−1 of N group, system fertilization was 12% and 24% higher compared to conventional fertilization. The soil quality index (SQIFERTBIO) was higher with 100 kg ha−1 (0.83) compared to 0 kg ha−1 of N (0.77), showing an 8% increase. Soybean yield was 3% higher with system fertilization and 7% higher with 100 kg ha−1 of N, compared to conventional fertilization with 0 kg ha−1 of N. In conclusion, even in the short term, adopting a system fertilization strategy and applying N-fertilization in pastures benefits soybean yields in ICLS under no-till.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在巴西塞拉多地区免耕条件下的作物-牲畜综合系统中,通过施肥策略提高土壤质量和谷物产量
该研究旨在评估在巴西塞拉多(Cerrado)地区作物-牲畜综合系统(ICLS)中施用或不施用氮肥的钾肥策略对土壤质量和作物产量的影响。处理方法包括各种施肥策略,如在种植阶段(常规施肥)或牧场阶段(系统施肥)施用磷和钾,在牧场阶段施用或不施用氮肥。实验开始两年后,从 0-10 厘米土层采集土壤样本,在作物周期结束时测定大豆产量。不同施肥策略对土壤碳储量基本没有影响。然而,与其他处理相比,在牧场使用常规施肥和 0 kg ha-1 氮肥时,土壤氮(N)储量以及微生物生物量中的碳(C)和氮(N)含量较低。常规施肥和每公顷牧草施氮量为 0 千克时,酶活性也会降低。在常规施肥情况下,每公顷施 100 千克氮比每公顷施 0 千克氮的养分循环和养分贮存得分更高,养分循环和养分贮存得分分别提高了 22% 和 18%。在与养分供应相关的土壤功能方面,各处理之间没有差异。在氮含量为 0 千克/公顷的组别中,系统施肥比常规施肥分别高出 12% 和 24%。土壤质量指数(SQIFERTBIO)为每公顷 100 千克(0.83),比每公顷 0 千克氮(0.77)高 8%。总之,即使在短期内,采用系统施肥策略并在牧场中施用氮肥也能提高免耕条件下 ICLS 大豆的产量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
European Journal of Soil Biology
European Journal of Soil Biology 环境科学-生态学
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
51
审稿时长
27 days
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Soil Biology covers all aspects of soil biology which deal with microbial and faunal ecology and activity in soils, as well as natural ecosystems or biomes connected to ecological interests: biodiversity, biological conservation, adaptation, impact of global changes on soil biodiversity and ecosystem functioning and effects and fate of pollutants as influenced by soil organisms. Different levels in ecosystem structure are taken into account: individuals, populations, communities and ecosystems themselves. At each level, different disciplinary approaches are welcomed: molecular biology, genetics, ecophysiology, ecology, biogeography and landscape ecology.
期刊最新文献
In-depth insights into carbohydrate-active enzyme genes regarding the disparities in soil organic carbon after 12-year rotational cropping system field study Nutrient supply enhances positive priming of soil organic C under straw amendment and accelerates the incorporation of straw-derived C into organic C pool in paddy soils Dynamics of nitrogen mineralization and nitrogen cycling functional genes in response to soil pore size distribution Soil microbial resistance and resilience to drought under organic and conventional farming Plantation conversion of Eucalyptus promotes soil microbial necromass C accumulation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1