COMPARATIVE STUDY BETWEEN SHELL AND SOLID FINITE ELEMENT MODELS FOR STEEL JOINTS CHARACTERIZATION

ce/papers Pub Date : 2024-03-27 DOI:10.1002/cepa.3018
J. Aguiar, F. Freire, A. F. Santos, F. Ljubinković, J. Conde, L. S. da Silva
{"title":"COMPARATIVE STUDY BETWEEN SHELL AND SOLID FINITE ELEMENT MODELS FOR STEEL JOINTS CHARACTERIZATION","authors":"J. Aguiar,&nbsp;F. Freire,&nbsp;A. F. Santos,&nbsp;F. Ljubinković,&nbsp;J. Conde,&nbsp;L. S. da Silva","doi":"10.1002/cepa.3018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Solid and shell finite element models (FEM) are two commonly used possibilities to analyse the structural behaviour of steel joints. The choice between solid and shell models often comes down to a balance between computational resources and the level of detail required for the study. In this paper, a set of welded beam-column joints with hot-rolled open sections is studied using both modelling techniques. The joints' behaviour is assessed in terms of resistance and initial stiffness. An improved shell FEM is proposed. The results indicate that for the studied dataset, both techniques return comparable results. Hence, the use of shell FEM seems to be a possible alternative to solid FEM and can be efficiently used for the joint characterization.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":100223,"journal":{"name":"ce/papers","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cepa.3018","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ce/papers","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cepa.3018","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Solid and shell finite element models (FEM) are two commonly used possibilities to analyse the structural behaviour of steel joints. The choice between solid and shell models often comes down to a balance between computational resources and the level of detail required for the study. In this paper, a set of welded beam-column joints with hot-rolled open sections is studied using both modelling techniques. The joints' behaviour is assessed in terms of resistance and initial stiffness. An improved shell FEM is proposed. The results indicate that for the studied dataset, both techniques return comparable results. Hence, the use of shell FEM seems to be a possible alternative to solid FEM and can be efficiently used for the joint characterization.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
钢接头表征的壳体和实体有限元模型比较研究
实体和壳体有限元模型(FEM)是分析钢接头结构行为的两种常用方法。在实体模型和壳体模型之间做出选择,往往需要在计算资源和研究要求的详细程度之间取得平衡。本文使用这两种建模技术对一组热轧开口型钢焊接梁柱接头进行了研究。从阻力和初始刚度的角度对接头的行为进行了评估。提出了一种改进的壳有限元模型。结果表明,对于所研究的数据集,两种技术得出的结果具有可比性。因此,使用壳有限元似乎可以替代实体有限元,并能有效地用于接头特性分析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Reliability-based Allowances of Corrosion Losses for Weathering Steel Bridges Failure mode and load prediction of steel bridge girders through 3D laser scanning and machine learning methods ‘Robinson’ Pedestrian Bridge in Budapest, Hungary Cable-stayed footbridge in Lover Vítkovice Area-DOV
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1