Combined impact of local anaesthetic infiltration through wound catheter and epidural analgesia following surgical hepatectomy: a meta-analysis

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q2 SURGERY Videosurgery and Other Miniinvasive Techniques Pub Date : 2024-02-27 DOI:10.5114/wiitm.2024.135810
Gang Shao, Shuwei Chen
{"title":"Combined impact of local anaesthetic infiltration through wound catheter and epidural analgesia following surgical hepatectomy: a meta-analysis","authors":"Gang Shao, Shuwei Chen","doi":"10.5114/wiitm.2024.135810","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<b>Introduction</b><br/>A meta-analysis was performed to examine the effects of wound catheter (WC) local anaesthetic infiltration (LAI) and epidural analgesia (EA) in open hepatectomy (OH).<br/><br/><b>Material and methods</b><br/>A systematic literature review was performed, which found 350 subjects with OH at the baseline of the studies; 159 of them were treated with WC local anaesthetic infiltration, and 191 used EA.<br/><br/><b>Results</b><br/>WC LAI substantially reduced the functional recovery time (MD = –0.64; 95% CI, –1.02 to –0.26, p &lt; 0.001) and increased the pain score on the second postoperative day (MD = 0.25; 95% CI: 0.10–0.40, p &lt; 0.001) compared to EA in OH patients. WC LAI did not vary from EA in OH patients in second postoperative opiate use (MD = –14.86; 95% CI: –32.88 to 3.16, p = 0.11) or overall complication rate (OR = 0.66; 95% CI: 0.41–1.04, p = 0.07).<br/><br/><b>Conclusions</b><br/>WC LAI showed a non-significant difference in opiate consumption on the second postoperative day and in the overall complication rate, compared with EA, but it showed a lower functional recovery time and higher pain score.<br/><br/>","PeriodicalId":49361,"journal":{"name":"Videosurgery and Other Miniinvasive Techniques","volume":"233 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Videosurgery and Other Miniinvasive Techniques","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5114/wiitm.2024.135810","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction
A meta-analysis was performed to examine the effects of wound catheter (WC) local anaesthetic infiltration (LAI) and epidural analgesia (EA) in open hepatectomy (OH).

Material and methods
A systematic literature review was performed, which found 350 subjects with OH at the baseline of the studies; 159 of them were treated with WC local anaesthetic infiltration, and 191 used EA.

Results
WC LAI substantially reduced the functional recovery time (MD = –0.64; 95% CI, –1.02 to –0.26, p < 0.001) and increased the pain score on the second postoperative day (MD = 0.25; 95% CI: 0.10–0.40, p < 0.001) compared to EA in OH patients. WC LAI did not vary from EA in OH patients in second postoperative opiate use (MD = –14.86; 95% CI: –32.88 to 3.16, p = 0.11) or overall complication rate (OR = 0.66; 95% CI: 0.41–1.04, p = 0.07).

Conclusions
WC LAI showed a non-significant difference in opiate consumption on the second postoperative day and in the overall complication rate, compared with EA, but it showed a lower functional recovery time and higher pain score.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
肝切除术后通过伤口导管浸润局麻药和硬膜外镇痛的综合影响:一项荟萃分析
材料和方法进行了系统性文献回顾,发现研究基线有350例OH患者,其中159例采用伤口导管局麻浸润治疗,191例采用硬膜外镇痛。结果 与 EA 相比,WC LAI 大幅缩短了 OH 患者的功能恢复时间(MD = -0.64;95% CI,-1.02 至 -0.26,p < 0.001),并增加了术后第二天的疼痛评分(MD = 0.25;95% CI:0.10-0.40,p < 0.001)。WC LAI 与 EA 相比,OH 患者术后第二天阿片类药物的使用量(MD = -14.86;95% CI:-32.88 至 3.16,p = 0.11)或总体并发症发生率(OR = 0.66;95% CI:0.41-1.04,p = 0.07)均无差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
23.50%
发文量
48
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: Videosurgery and other miniinvasive techniques serves as a forum for exchange of multidisciplinary experiences in fields such as: surgery, gynaecology, urology, gastroenterology, neurosurgery, ENT surgery, cardiac surgery, anaesthesiology and radiology, as well as other branches of medicine dealing with miniinvasive techniques.
期刊最新文献
Early-stage voiding function following uni- versus bilateral inferior vesical vessel resection during therapeutic lateral lymph node dissection with autonomic nerve sparing for advanced low rectal cancer (with video) Effect and prognosis of endoscopic intracranial hematoma removal and hematoma puncture and drainage in patients with hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage Outcomes of minimally invasive surgery for pulmonary metastasis: who benefits the most? Meta-analysis of clinical efficacy and safety of transanal endoscopic microsurgery and endoscopic submucosal dissection in the treatment of rectal tumors Clinical comparative study of laparoscopic partial splenectomy and open partial splenectomy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1