{"title":"Epidural analgesia during surgery and its relation to postoperative myocardial infarction: meta-analysis","authors":"Qiong Hu, Xuqi Yu, Ting Zhou","doi":"10.5114/wiitm.2024.135977","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<b>Introduction</b><br/>Epidural analgesia has been studied for its potential advantages after surgery in a number of randomized clinical trials, with most finding improvements in pain and secondary endpoints like the incidence of postoperative complications.<br/><br/><b>Aim</b><br/>To assess the relationship between use of epidural analgesia and adverse cardiac outcomes expressed by myocardial infarction (MI).<br/><br/><b>Material and methods</b><br/>Fifty-three studies were recruited to quantify the influence of different surgical-related analgesic methods on clinical parameters (mortality and adverse events). The results of these trials were analysed using a random effects model, which was then used to calculate the mean difference (MD) with 95 per cent confidence intervals (CIs).<br/><br/><b>Results</b><br/>Epidural analgesia resulted in preferred cardiac outcomes compared with traditional analgesia. These findings were supported by significantly lower MI events for the epidural analgesia group as follows: p = 0.005, p = 0,007, and p = 0.03 for the total number of included studies, studies with high risk of bias, and studies with low risk of bias, respectively. Studies with intermediate risk showed a non-significant difference between both groups (p = 0.7).<br/><br/><b>Conclusions</b><br/>Epidural analgesia has a significant protective cardiac effect through the reduction of postoperative MI events among surgery subjects.<br/><br/>","PeriodicalId":49361,"journal":{"name":"Videosurgery and Other Miniinvasive Techniques","volume":"27 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Videosurgery and Other Miniinvasive Techniques","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5114/wiitm.2024.135977","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction Epidural analgesia has been studied for its potential advantages after surgery in a number of randomized clinical trials, with most finding improvements in pain and secondary endpoints like the incidence of postoperative complications.
Aim To assess the relationship between use of epidural analgesia and adverse cardiac outcomes expressed by myocardial infarction (MI).
Material and methods Fifty-three studies were recruited to quantify the influence of different surgical-related analgesic methods on clinical parameters (mortality and adverse events). The results of these trials were analysed using a random effects model, which was then used to calculate the mean difference (MD) with 95 per cent confidence intervals (CIs).
Results Epidural analgesia resulted in preferred cardiac outcomes compared with traditional analgesia. These findings were supported by significantly lower MI events for the epidural analgesia group as follows: p = 0.005, p = 0,007, and p = 0.03 for the total number of included studies, studies with high risk of bias, and studies with low risk of bias, respectively. Studies with intermediate risk showed a non-significant difference between both groups (p = 0.7).
Conclusions Epidural analgesia has a significant protective cardiac effect through the reduction of postoperative MI events among surgery subjects.
期刊介绍:
Videosurgery and other miniinvasive techniques serves as a forum for exchange of multidisciplinary experiences in fields such as: surgery, gynaecology, urology, gastroenterology, neurosurgery, ENT surgery, cardiac surgery, anaesthesiology and radiology, as well as other branches of medicine dealing with miniinvasive techniques.