The morphosyntax of Gothic preverb compounds: incorporation and applicativisation

Tamisha L. Tan
{"title":"The morphosyntax of Gothic preverb compounds: incorporation and applicativisation","authors":"Tamisha L. Tan","doi":"10.1007/s10828-024-09151-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Gothic preverb compounds illustrate several interesting characteristics, including multiple preverb stacking, idiomatisation, tmesis (i.e., separation by clitics), and P-copying (i.e., multiple pronunciation of the preverb). This paper is a close examination of the morphosyntax of these compounds, highlighting novel empirical generalisations about the Gothic language with key theoretical implications for our understanding of Germanic complex verbs and the alternations they participate in. In particular, this paper proposes a structural distinction between preverb compounds which are obligatorily semantically transparent and those which are optionally idiomatic. In arguing that transparent compounds involve the mechanism of preposition incorporation and <i>m-merger</i>, paralleling recent accounts of clitic doubling, while idiomatic compounds involve a thematic high applicative projection, this paper captures nuanced differences in these compounds’ case assignment and argument licensing behaviour. These structural differences will be shown to derive these two compound types’ constrained interaction with the aforementioned phenomena of stacking, tmesis, and copying. In addition, this paper compares Gothic complex verbs to their cross-linguistic correlates within and beyond Germanic, whilst also providing a diachronic pathway for the development of (multiple) preverb compounds.</p>","PeriodicalId":75059,"journal":{"name":"The journal of comparative Germanic linguistics","volume":"27 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The journal of comparative Germanic linguistics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10828-024-09151-z","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Gothic preverb compounds illustrate several interesting characteristics, including multiple preverb stacking, idiomatisation, tmesis (i.e., separation by clitics), and P-copying (i.e., multiple pronunciation of the preverb). This paper is a close examination of the morphosyntax of these compounds, highlighting novel empirical generalisations about the Gothic language with key theoretical implications for our understanding of Germanic complex verbs and the alternations they participate in. In particular, this paper proposes a structural distinction between preverb compounds which are obligatorily semantically transparent and those which are optionally idiomatic. In arguing that transparent compounds involve the mechanism of preposition incorporation and m-merger, paralleling recent accounts of clitic doubling, while idiomatic compounds involve a thematic high applicative projection, this paper captures nuanced differences in these compounds’ case assignment and argument licensing behaviour. These structural differences will be shown to derive these two compound types’ constrained interaction with the aforementioned phenomena of stacking, tmesis, and copying. In addition, this paper compares Gothic complex verbs to their cross-linguistic correlates within and beyond Germanic, whilst also providing a diachronic pathway for the development of (multiple) preverb compounds.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
哥特式前谓语复合词的形态语法:合并和应用化
哥特式前置词复合体有几个有趣的特点,包括多个前置词堆叠、惯用语化、tmesis(即由单韵母分隔)和 P-copying(即前置词的多重发音)。本文对这些复合词的形态语法进行了仔细研究,突出了关于哥特语言的新的经验性概括,对我们理解日耳曼复合动词及其参与的交替现象具有重要的理论意义。本文特别提出了必须语义透明的前谓语复合词和可选择成语的前谓语复合词之间的结构区别。本文认为,透明复合词涉及介词并入和m-合并的机制,这与最近关于介词加倍的说法相似,而惯用复合词则涉及主题性的高应用投射,因此本文捕捉到了这些复合词在大小写分配和论据许可行为上的细微差别。这些结构上的差异将被证明是这两种化合物类型与上述堆叠、时序和复制现象相互作用的制约因素。此外,本文还将哥特复合动词与日耳曼语内外的跨语言相关词进行了比较,同时为(多重)前谓复合词的发展提供了一条非同步途径。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Nominal VP anaphora in Scandinavian and English Unmarkedness of the coronal nasal in Alemannic Root participles: directive, commissive, expressive and representative participles in Germanic root configurations The morphosyntax of Gothic preverb compounds: incorporation and applicativisation Root suppletion in Swedish as contextual allomorphy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1