Examining the effects of exercise with different cognitive loads on executive function: A systematic review.

4区 医学 Q3 Neuroscience Progress in brain research Pub Date : 2024-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-02-02 DOI:10.1016/bs.pbr.2024.01.003
Chiung-Ling Chu, Ting-Yu Chueh, Tsung-Min Hung
{"title":"Examining the effects of exercise with different cognitive loads on executive function: A systematic review.","authors":"Chiung-Ling Chu, Ting-Yu Chueh, Tsung-Min Hung","doi":"10.1016/bs.pbr.2024.01.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Executive functions (EFs) play a pivotal role in daily functioning, academic and vocational achievement, well-being, and the regulation of cognitive processes that impact the quality of life. Physical exercise has been shown to have positive effects on EFs. However, there remains some controversy regarding whether exercise with greater cognitive loads may be more effective for improving EFs. Through this systematic review, we aimed to synthesize available cross-sectional and longitudinal intervention studies concerning the effects of exercise with varying cognitive loads on EFs. The literature search was conducted across three electronic databases, retrieving cross-sectional and longitudinal intervention (randomized controlled trials) studies, using a standardized EF measurement from inception until June 2023. Our search yielded a total of 1570 potentially relevant articles, of which 53 were considered for full-text reading, and 28 were included in the review after full-text reading. The present study utilized Gentile's (2000) taxonomy classification to determine the cognitive load levels in exercises. Overall, findings from the 28 included studies suggested that exercise training interventions are a promising way to promote overall EF. Noteworthy, there is preliminary empirical evidence to suggest that exercises with higher cognitive loads resulted in greater benefits for EF than those with lower cognitive loads.</p>","PeriodicalId":20598,"journal":{"name":"Progress in brain research","volume":"283 ","pages":"167-192"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Progress in brain research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.pbr.2024.01.003","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/2/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Neuroscience","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Executive functions (EFs) play a pivotal role in daily functioning, academic and vocational achievement, well-being, and the regulation of cognitive processes that impact the quality of life. Physical exercise has been shown to have positive effects on EFs. However, there remains some controversy regarding whether exercise with greater cognitive loads may be more effective for improving EFs. Through this systematic review, we aimed to synthesize available cross-sectional and longitudinal intervention studies concerning the effects of exercise with varying cognitive loads on EFs. The literature search was conducted across three electronic databases, retrieving cross-sectional and longitudinal intervention (randomized controlled trials) studies, using a standardized EF measurement from inception until June 2023. Our search yielded a total of 1570 potentially relevant articles, of which 53 were considered for full-text reading, and 28 were included in the review after full-text reading. The present study utilized Gentile's (2000) taxonomy classification to determine the cognitive load levels in exercises. Overall, findings from the 28 included studies suggested that exercise training interventions are a promising way to promote overall EF. Noteworthy, there is preliminary empirical evidence to suggest that exercises with higher cognitive loads resulted in greater benefits for EF than those with lower cognitive loads.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
研究不同认知负荷下的运动对执行功能的影响:系统综述。
执行功能(EFs)在日常功能、学业和职业成就、幸福感以及影响生活质量的认知过程调节方面发挥着举足轻重的作用。体育锻炼已被证明对执行功能有积极影响。然而,关于认知负荷更大的运动是否能更有效地改善EFs,仍然存在一些争议。通过本系统性综述,我们旨在综合现有的关于不同认知负荷的运动对 EFs 影响的横断面和纵向干预研究。我们在三个电子数据库中进行了文献检索,检索了横断面和纵向干预(随机对照试验)研究,并使用了从开始到 2023 年 6 月的标准化 EF 测量方法。我们共搜索到 1570 篇可能相关的文章,其中 53 篇被考虑进行全文阅读,28 篇在全文阅读后被纳入综述。本研究采用了 Gentile(2000 年)的分类法来确定练习中的认知负荷水平。总体而言,28 项纳入研究的结果表明,运动训练干预是促进整体 EF 的一种有前途的方法。值得注意的是,有初步的经验证据表明,认知负荷较高的运动比认知负荷较低的运动对 EF 有更大的益处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Progress in brain research
Progress in brain research 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
174
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Progress in Brain Research is the most acclaimed and accomplished series in neuroscience. The serial is well-established as an extensive documentation of contemporary advances in the field. The volumes contain authoritative reviews and original articles by invited specialists. The rigorous editing of the volumes assures that they will appeal to all laboratory and clinical brain research workers in the various disciplines: neuroanatomy, neurophysiology, neuropharmacology, neuroendocrinology, neuropathology, basic neurology, biological psychiatry and the behavioral sciences.
期刊最新文献
Effects of volume-matched acute exercise on metacognition in late middle-aged adults: The roles of exercise intensity and duration. Electrophysiological investigation of active-assisted vs recumbent cycling: A pilot study in healthy older adults. Examining the effects of exercise with different cognitive loads on executive function: A systematic review. Exploring the influence of a 4-week aerobic exercise intervention on cognitive control processes in young adults: An SFT and DDM study. Investigating mechanisms of sport-related cognitive improvement using measures of motor learning.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1