Matthew M Miller, Shanna Mayorov, Ramapriya Ganti, Jonathan V Nguyen, Carrie M Rochman, Matthew Caley, Jessie Jahjah, Kathy Repich, James T Patrie, Roger T Anderson, Jennifer A Harvey, Timothy B Rooney
{"title":"Patient Experience of Women With Dense Breasts Undergoing Screening Contrast-Enhanced Mammography.","authors":"Matthew M Miller, Shanna Mayorov, Ramapriya Ganti, Jonathan V Nguyen, Carrie M Rochman, Matthew Caley, Jessie Jahjah, Kathy Repich, James T Patrie, Roger T Anderson, Jennifer A Harvey, Timothy B Rooney","doi":"10.1093/jbi/wbae012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>We investigated patient experience with screening contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM) to determine whether a general population of women with dense breasts would accept CEM in a screening setting.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this institutional review board-approved prospective study, patients with heterogeneous and extremely dense breasts on their mammogram were invited to undergo screening CEM and complete pre-CEM and post-CEM surveys. On the pre-CEM survey, patients were asked about their attitudes regarding supplemental screening in general. On the post-CEM survey, patients were asked about their experience undergoing screening CEM, including causes and severity of any discomfort and whether they would consider undergoing screening CEM again in the future or recommend it to a friend.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One hundred sixty-three women were surveyed before and after screening CEM. Most patients, 97.5% (159/163), reported minimal or no unpleasantness associated with undergoing screening CEM. In addition, 91.4% (149/163) said they would probably or very likely undergo screening CEM in the future if it cost the same as a traditional screening mammogram, and 95.1% (155/163) said they would probably or very likely recommend screening CEM to a friend. Patients in this study, who were all willing to undergo CEM, more frequently reported a family history of breast cancer than a comparison cohort of women with dense breasts (58.2% vs 47.1%, P = .027).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Patients from a general population of women with dense breasts reported a positive experience undergoing screening CEM, suggesting screening CEM might be well received by this patient population, particularly if the cost was comparable with traditional screening mammography.</p>","PeriodicalId":43134,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Breast Imaging","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Breast Imaging","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jbi/wbae012","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: We investigated patient experience with screening contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM) to determine whether a general population of women with dense breasts would accept CEM in a screening setting.
Methods: In this institutional review board-approved prospective study, patients with heterogeneous and extremely dense breasts on their mammogram were invited to undergo screening CEM and complete pre-CEM and post-CEM surveys. On the pre-CEM survey, patients were asked about their attitudes regarding supplemental screening in general. On the post-CEM survey, patients were asked about their experience undergoing screening CEM, including causes and severity of any discomfort and whether they would consider undergoing screening CEM again in the future or recommend it to a friend.
Results: One hundred sixty-three women were surveyed before and after screening CEM. Most patients, 97.5% (159/163), reported minimal or no unpleasantness associated with undergoing screening CEM. In addition, 91.4% (149/163) said they would probably or very likely undergo screening CEM in the future if it cost the same as a traditional screening mammogram, and 95.1% (155/163) said they would probably or very likely recommend screening CEM to a friend. Patients in this study, who were all willing to undergo CEM, more frequently reported a family history of breast cancer than a comparison cohort of women with dense breasts (58.2% vs 47.1%, P = .027).
Conclusion: Patients from a general population of women with dense breasts reported a positive experience undergoing screening CEM, suggesting screening CEM might be well received by this patient population, particularly if the cost was comparable with traditional screening mammography.
目的我们调查了患者对造影剂增强乳腺 X 线照相术(CEM)筛查的体验,以确定乳房致密的普通女性是否会接受 CEM 筛查:在这项经机构审查委员会批准的前瞻性研究中,乳房X光检查中乳房密度不均匀和极度致密的患者被邀请接受CEM筛查,并完成CEM前和CEM后调查。在 CEM 前的调查中,患者被问及他们对补充筛查的总体态度。在 CEM 后调查中,患者被问及她们接受 CEM 筛查的经历,包括任何不适的原因和严重程度,以及她们将来是否会考虑再次接受 CEM 筛查或向朋友推荐:163 名妇女在接受 CEM 筛查前后接受了调查。大多数患者(97.5%,159/163)表示,接受 CEM 筛查带来的不适感很小或没有。此外,91.4%(149/163)的患者表示,如果CEM筛查的费用与传统乳腺X光检查相同,她们将来可能或很可能会接受CEM筛查;95.1%(155/163)的患者表示,她们可能或很可能会向朋友推荐CEM筛查。本研究中的患者都愿意接受 CEM 筛查,她们报告有乳腺癌家族史的比例高于乳房致密的女性对比队列(58.2% vs 47.1%,P = .027):结论:乳房致密的普通女性患者在接受CEM筛查时表现积极,这表明CEM筛查可能会受到这类患者的欢迎,尤其是在费用与传统乳房X光筛查相当的情况下。