Can social connections become stressful? Exploring the link between social media use and perceived stress in cross-sectional and longitudinal analyses of 25,053 adults.

IF 3.2 4区 医学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY Journal of Mental Health Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-03-28 DOI:10.1080/09638237.2024.2332802
Mette Nygaard, Thea Otte Andersen, Naja Hulvej Rod
{"title":"Can social connections become stressful? Exploring the link between social media use and perceived stress in cross-sectional and longitudinal analyses of 25,053 adults.","authors":"Mette Nygaard, Thea Otte Andersen, Naja Hulvej Rod","doi":"10.1080/09638237.2024.2332802","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Social media has become a dominant part of daily lives for many, but excessive use may lead to an experience of stress. Only relatively few studies have investigated social media's influence on mental health.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>We aimed to investigate whether social media use is associated with perceived stress and changes in perceived stress over 18 months.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study population consisted of 25,053 adults (mean age 42.8; 62% women) from the SmartSleep Study. Self-reported frequency of social media use, of 10 specific social media platforms, and of perceived stress (the Perceived Stress Scale 4 item) was obtained at baseline and 18-months follow-up (<i>N</i> = 1745). The associations were evaluated at baseline and follow-up using multiple linear regression models adjusted for potential confounders.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Compared to non-use, high social media use (at least every second hour) was associated with a slightly higher perceived stress level at baseline. No association was found between the frequency of social media use and changes in perceived stress during follow-up. Only small differences in these associations were noted across social media platforms.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Further studies are needed to comprehensively explore the relationship between excessive social media use and mental health, recognizing different characteristics across social media platforms.</p>","PeriodicalId":48135,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Mental Health","volume":" ","pages":"596-604"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Mental Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09638237.2024.2332802","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/3/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Social media has become a dominant part of daily lives for many, but excessive use may lead to an experience of stress. Only relatively few studies have investigated social media's influence on mental health.

Aims: We aimed to investigate whether social media use is associated with perceived stress and changes in perceived stress over 18 months.

Methods: The study population consisted of 25,053 adults (mean age 42.8; 62% women) from the SmartSleep Study. Self-reported frequency of social media use, of 10 specific social media platforms, and of perceived stress (the Perceived Stress Scale 4 item) was obtained at baseline and 18-months follow-up (N = 1745). The associations were evaluated at baseline and follow-up using multiple linear regression models adjusted for potential confounders.

Results: Compared to non-use, high social media use (at least every second hour) was associated with a slightly higher perceived stress level at baseline. No association was found between the frequency of social media use and changes in perceived stress during follow-up. Only small differences in these associations were noted across social media platforms.

Conclusions: Further studies are needed to comprehensively explore the relationship between excessive social media use and mental health, recognizing different characteristics across social media platforms.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
社交关系会让人感到压力吗?通过对 25,053 名成年人进行横截面和纵向分析,探索社交媒体使用与感知压力之间的联系。
背景介绍社交媒体已成为许多人日常生活的主要部分,但过度使用社交媒体可能会导致压力体验。只有相对较少的研究调查了社交媒体对心理健康的影响。目的:我们旨在调查社交媒体的使用是否与感知到的压力有关,以及感知到的压力在 18 个月内的变化情况:研究对象包括智能睡眠研究中的 25053 名成年人(平均年龄 42.8 岁;62% 为女性)。在基线和18个月的随访中,对社交媒体的使用频率、10个特定社交媒体平台和感知压力(感知压力量表4项)进行了自我报告(N = 1745)。使用多元线性回归模型评估了基线和随访时的相关性,并对潜在的混杂因素进行了调整:与不使用社交媒体相比,社交媒体使用频率高(至少每隔一小时使用一次)与基线压力水平略高有关。使用社交媒体的频率与随访期间感知压力的变化之间没有关联。在不同的社交媒体平台上,这些关联仅存在微小差异:需要进一步开展研究,以全面探讨过度使用社交媒体与心理健康之间的关系,同时认识到不同社交媒体平台的不同特点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Mental Health
Journal of Mental Health PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
3.00%
发文量
117
期刊介绍: The Journal of Mental Health is an international forum for the latest research in the mental health field. Reaching over 65 countries, the journal reports on the best in evidence-based practice around the world and provides a channel of communication between the many disciplines involved in mental health research and practice. The journal encourages multi-disciplinary research and welcomes contributions that have involved the users of mental health services. The international editorial team are committed to seeking out excellent work from a range of sources and theoretical perspectives. The journal not only reflects current good practice but also aims to influence policy by reporting on innovations that challenge traditional ways of working.
期刊最新文献
"I don't think people realise how important they are": a mixed methods evaluation of Samaritans' services. Using recovery-focused PROMs in mental health care: what helps and what gets in the way? A scoping review. AI-generated commentaries and letters to the editor of peer-reviewed publications: editors and authors beware! Exercise and life satisfaction: the case of Parkrun. Addressing eco-distress in psychotherapy: a guideline developed from the thematic analysis of practitioners' experiences in simulation-based training scenarios.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1