Accelerometer and Survey Assessed Physical Activity in Children With Epilepsy: A Case-Controlled Study.

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 PEDIATRICS Pediatric Exercise Science Pub Date : 2024-03-27 DOI:10.1123/pes.2023-0065
Joan Idowu, Natalie Pearson, Collette Meades, J Helen Cross, Amy Muggeridge, Monica Lakhanpaul, Kerry Robinson, Lauren B Sherar, Colin Reilly
{"title":"Accelerometer and Survey Assessed Physical Activity in Children With Epilepsy: A Case-Controlled Study.","authors":"Joan Idowu, Natalie Pearson, Collette Meades, J Helen Cross, Amy Muggeridge, Monica Lakhanpaul, Kerry Robinson, Lauren B Sherar, Colin Reilly","doi":"10.1123/pes.2023-0065","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Anecdotal evidence suggests that children with epilepsy (CWE) are limited in the frequency of their daily physical activity (PA). However, there is limited research utilizing device-based measures of PA. We compared levels of PA and sedentary behavior in CWE (11-15 y) and age- and gender-matched healthy controls.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Participants (n = 60 CWE [25 males, 35 females] and n = 49 controls [25 males, 24 females]) wore a Actigraph accelerometer (GT3X or GT3X+) for 7 consecutive days during waking hours and self-reported their PA and sedentary behaviors. CWE were compared with control children on time spent in different intensities of PA and on self-reported PA and sedentary behavior. Factors associated with PA were analyzed using linear regression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>CWE spent less time in accelerometer assessed light (189.15 vs 215.01 min/d, P < .05) and vigorous PA (35.14 vs 44.28 min/d, P < .05) on weekdays compared with controls. There were no significant differences between CWE and control participants in accelerometer assessed time spent sedentary or time spent in PA on weekends. Among CWE, older children engaged in more reported sedentary behavior and younger children spent more time in most domains of PA (P < .05). Furthermore, CWE reported less PA than controls (P = .006). Sixteen percent of controls met World Health Organization PA guidelines compared with 10% of CWE. There was a positive relationship between accelerometer assessed PA and quality of life for CWE.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>CWE spent less time in light and moderate to vigorous PA on weekdays. Further research is needed to understand reasons for these differences.</p>","PeriodicalId":49712,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric Exercise Science","volume":" ","pages":"1-9"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatric Exercise Science","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1123/pes.2023-0065","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Anecdotal evidence suggests that children with epilepsy (CWE) are limited in the frequency of their daily physical activity (PA). However, there is limited research utilizing device-based measures of PA. We compared levels of PA and sedentary behavior in CWE (11-15 y) and age- and gender-matched healthy controls.

Method: Participants (n = 60 CWE [25 males, 35 females] and n = 49 controls [25 males, 24 females]) wore a Actigraph accelerometer (GT3X or GT3X+) for 7 consecutive days during waking hours and self-reported their PA and sedentary behaviors. CWE were compared with control children on time spent in different intensities of PA and on self-reported PA and sedentary behavior. Factors associated with PA were analyzed using linear regression.

Results: CWE spent less time in accelerometer assessed light (189.15 vs 215.01 min/d, P < .05) and vigorous PA (35.14 vs 44.28 min/d, P < .05) on weekdays compared with controls. There were no significant differences between CWE and control participants in accelerometer assessed time spent sedentary or time spent in PA on weekends. Among CWE, older children engaged in more reported sedentary behavior and younger children spent more time in most domains of PA (P < .05). Furthermore, CWE reported less PA than controls (P = .006). Sixteen percent of controls met World Health Organization PA guidelines compared with 10% of CWE. There was a positive relationship between accelerometer assessed PA and quality of life for CWE.

Conclusion: CWE spent less time in light and moderate to vigorous PA on weekdays. Further research is needed to understand reasons for these differences.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
癫痫患儿的加速计和调查评估体力活动:病例对照研究
目的:轶事证据表明,癫痫儿童(CWE)的日常体育活动(PA)频率有限。然而,利用基于设备的 PA 测量方法进行的研究却很有限。我们比较了 CWE(11-15 岁)与年龄和性别匹配的健康对照组的 PA 水平和久坐行为:参与者(n = 60 名 CWE [25 名男性,35 名女性] 和 n = 49 名对照组 [25 名男性,24 名女性])连续 7 天在清醒时佩戴 Actigraph 加速计(GT3X 或 GT3X+),并自我报告其 PA 和久坐行为。CWE与对照组儿童在不同强度的PA所花费的时间以及自我报告的PA和久坐行为方面进行了比较。使用线性回归分析了与 PA 相关的因素:结果:与对照组儿童相比,慢性病儿童平日在加速度计评估的轻度 PA(189.15 分钟/天 vs 215.01 分钟/天,P < .05)和剧烈 PA(35.14 分钟/天 vs 44.28 分钟/天,P < .05)上花费的时间较少。在加速度计评估的久坐不动时间或周末参加体育锻炼的时间方面,CWE 和对照组参与者之间没有明显差异。在 CWE 中,年龄较大的儿童报告的久坐行为较多,而年龄较小的儿童在大多数 PA 领域花费的时间较多(P < .05)。此外,CWE 报告的 PA 比对照组少(P = .006)。16%的对照组儿童达到了世界卫生组织的 PA 指导标准,而 CWE 仅为 10%。加速计评估的 CWE PA 与生活质量之间存在正相关关系:结论:CWE 平日用于轻度和中度至剧烈运动的时间较少。需要进一步研究以了解这些差异的原因。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Pediatric Exercise Science
Pediatric Exercise Science 医学-生理学
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
33
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Pediatric Exercise Science is a journal committed to enriching the scientific knowledge of exercise during childhood and adolescence. To this end it publishes information that contributes to an understanding of (a) the unique aspects of the physiologic, physical, biochemical, and psychologic responses of children to exercise, (b) the role of exercise in the treatment of pediatric chronic diseases, (c) the importance of physical activity in the prevention of illness and preservation of wellness, and (d) the means by which participation in sports may be made safer and more enjoyable for children and youth. Consideration will be given for publication of work by various methodologies consistent with the scientific approach. Besides original research, the journal includes review articles, abstracts from other journals, book reviews, and editorial comments. Pediatric Exercise Science encourages the expression of conflicting opinions regarding children and exercise by providing a forum for alternative viewpoints. At the same time it serves as a means of accumulating a base of research information that will allow application of experimental data to clinical practice. The scientific disciplines contributing to this body of knowledge are diverse. Therefore it is the purpose of this journal to provide a common focus for disseminating advances in the science of exercise during childhood. In doing so, the journal allows the opportunity for cross-fertilization of ideas between disciplines that will potentiate the growth of knowledge in this field. Pediatric Exercise Science seeks to stimulate new ideas regarding exercise in children and to increase the awareness of scientists, health care providers, and physical educators of the importance of exercise during childhood.
期刊最新文献
A Fundamental Movement Skill Test for Preschool Children With and Without Overweight: The SALTO Test Battery. A Note on "Response to: Methodological Rigor in Reference Chart Development: A Comment on 'Normative Reference Centiles for Sprint Performance in High-Level Youth Soccer Players: The Need To Consider Biological Maturity'". Does Physical Exercise Improve Resting Autonomic Cardiac Modulation in Overweight and Obese Children and Adolescents? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Effects of Short- Versus Long-Distance Repeated-Sprint Ability Training on Physical Performance in Youth Male Soccer Players. Surveillance of Youth Sports Participation in the United States: Strengths, Limitations, and Future Directions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1