Creating careers in the kingdom of content. The platform-dependence and platform-ambivalence of digital cultural labour in Norway

IF 2 2区 社会学 0 LITERATURE Poetics Pub Date : 2024-03-27 DOI:10.1016/j.poetic.2024.101885
Ole Marius Hylland, Heidi Stavrum, Mari T. Heian, Bård Kleppe, Kristine P. Miland
{"title":"Creating careers in the kingdom of content. The platform-dependence and platform-ambivalence of digital cultural labour in Norway","authors":"Ole Marius Hylland,&nbsp;Heidi Stavrum,&nbsp;Mari T. Heian,&nbsp;Bård Kleppe,&nbsp;Kristine P. Miland","doi":"10.1016/j.poetic.2024.101885","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Cultural production is to an increasing degree characterized by digitalization, mediatization, platformization and the use of social media. In this article, we investigate how digital cultural labour is experienced by platform-dependent cultural producers. Based on qualitative in-depth interviews with more than twenty Norwegian content creators, we more specifically analyse how they describe and valuate their products and production, the online communication of their labour, and the careers and strategies of digital cultural labour. The production of content is experienced as a demanding and continuous endeavour, being relentlessly quantified through clicks and metrics. Furthermore, the content creators show the psychological toll of being the product or a more or less integrated part of the product. Partly because of the challenges of continuous content production and communication with a community, as well as because of the unpredictable power of algorithms, we see creators branching out, spreading risk, or combining platform-dependency with -independency. This tendency only partly explains why digital cultural labour in the Norwegian context does not tend to represent a career end in itself, but a means to reach other and/or more long-term career goals. In the Norwegian context, this tendency is also explained by other factors: the welfare-oriented and inclusive Nordic model of cultural policy, which includes a public broadcaster integrating social media actively in its portfolio, as well as a general risk- and precarity-reducing welfare society.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":47900,"journal":{"name":"Poetics","volume":"103 ","pages":"Article 101885"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304422X2400024X/pdfft?md5=71820c42d1d7269ea1e106f35d880505&pid=1-s2.0-S0304422X2400024X-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Poetics","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304422X2400024X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERATURE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Cultural production is to an increasing degree characterized by digitalization, mediatization, platformization and the use of social media. In this article, we investigate how digital cultural labour is experienced by platform-dependent cultural producers. Based on qualitative in-depth interviews with more than twenty Norwegian content creators, we more specifically analyse how they describe and valuate their products and production, the online communication of their labour, and the careers and strategies of digital cultural labour. The production of content is experienced as a demanding and continuous endeavour, being relentlessly quantified through clicks and metrics. Furthermore, the content creators show the psychological toll of being the product or a more or less integrated part of the product. Partly because of the challenges of continuous content production and communication with a community, as well as because of the unpredictable power of algorithms, we see creators branching out, spreading risk, or combining platform-dependency with -independency. This tendency only partly explains why digital cultural labour in the Norwegian context does not tend to represent a career end in itself, but a means to reach other and/or more long-term career goals. In the Norwegian context, this tendency is also explained by other factors: the welfare-oriented and inclusive Nordic model of cultural policy, which includes a public broadcaster integrating social media actively in its portfolio, as well as a general risk- and precarity-reducing welfare society.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在内容王国创造职业生涯。挪威数字文化劳动的平台依赖性和平台矛盾性
文化生产在越来越大的程度上呈现出数字化、媒体化、平台化和使用社交媒体的特点。在本文中,我们将探讨依赖平台的文化生产者是如何体验数字文化劳动的。在对二十多位挪威内容创作者进行深入定性访谈的基础上,我们更具体地分析了他们如何描述和评价自己的产品和生产、他们劳动的在线传播以及数字文化劳动的职业和战略。内容制作被视为一项艰巨而持续的工作,通过点击量和指标被无情地量化。此外,内容创作者还表现出了作为产品或产品的一个或多或少的组成部分所付出的心理代价。部分由于持续的内容生产和与社区的沟通所带来的挑战,以及算法不可预测的力量,我们看到创作者们开始分化、分散风险,或将平台依赖与平台独立结合起来。这种趋势只是部分地解释了为什么在挪威,数字文化劳动本身并不代表职业目的,而是实现其他和/或更长期职业目标的一种手段。就挪威而言,其他因素也可以解释这种倾向:以福利为导向、具有包容性的北欧文化政策模式,其中包括将社交媒体积极纳入其业务组合的公共广播机构,以及普遍降低风险和减少不稳定因素的福利社会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Poetics
Poetics Multiple-
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
16.00%
发文量
77
期刊介绍: Poetics is an interdisciplinary journal of theoretical and empirical research on culture, the media and the arts. Particularly welcome are papers that make an original contribution to the major disciplines - sociology, psychology, media and communication studies, and economics - within which promising lines of research on culture, media and the arts have been developed.
期刊最新文献
Reconfiguring “Heritage hip-hop” From the scenes: Rightful youth rebellion and localised authenticity in the Huxiang Flow The role of hope and fear in the impact of climate fiction on climate action intentions: Evidence from India and USA Divergences and convergences across European musical preferences: How taste varies within and between countries Designed for success or failure: Differences in funding and rejection in the space of applications to the Danish Art Foundation among craftsmen and designers Mapping knowledge: Topic analysis of science locates researchers in disciplinary landscape
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1